“Volatile markets call for stop-loss orders” CBS Marketwatch.com, April 1, 2003

“Beware the Squeeze” October 31, 2002

5 “Must Have” URLs, Bull Market Report, June 17, 2002

The Zen of Trading, TC2000/Worden Brothers’ Comments, May 05, 2002

Taking Responsibility April 18, 2002

Six months later: A real recovery, CBS Marketwatch.com, March 11, 2002

Managing Sudden Wealth, April 8, 2002

The Envelope Please . . ., March 21, 2002

Risk Management of “Fiasco” Stocks, February, 5, 2002

Appliance buzz: The chatter on Apple’s new device, CBS Marketwatch.com, Oct. 21, 2001

iCrate: The Apple “Digital Lifestyle” iAppliance? Mac OS Rumors, Oct. 21, 2001

Seven Steps to Improve Your Portfolio, CBS Marketwatch.com, August 8, 2001

Ten Reasons to Start Getting Bullish, TheStreet.com, March 23, 2001

Life After Napster, TheStreet.com, February 22, 2001

Nasdaq at the Crossroads, TheStreet.com, February 20, 2001

Cisco: It Was All in the Chart, TheStreet.com, February 7, 2001

Contrary Indicators Tip Off Discerning Investors, TheStreet.com, January 5, 2001

Even More Contrary Indicators, TheStreet.com, January 19, 2001

Return of the Son of even More Contrary Indicators January 31, 2001

Can Bush Save Microsoft? (Don’t Bet On It), TheStreet.com, December 22, 2000

The Real Reason the PC Makers’ Growth Is Slowing,
TheStreet.com, December 11, 2000

Popular Loss, Electoral Victory?, CBS Marketwatch.com, November 1, 2000

Winners and Losers in the 2000 Elections
Gainers/Decliners in the Political Market Place, December 12, 2000

270 Not the Magic Number Everyone Thinks it is.
Post Election Confusion has Constitutional Scholars Sharpening Their Pencils, November 11, 2000

A Million Garages, MacOSRumors.com, April 20, 2000

Y2K Bug A Hoax, Journal Declares, SJNN.com, April 1, 2000
(Based on earlier work done
here)

Popular or Best? (mirror site ), ATPM.com January 1998

Duffers Need Not Apply, June, 1998

The Skeptics Guide to Stock Tips

Category: Weblogs

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

Comments are closed.