Several of you asked how I can still be raising questions about the sustainability of the economic recovery at this “stage” — despite all the obvious improvements.
In my opinion, the single biggest obstacle to a sustainable recovery is the lack of significant job creation. Let’s pretend the elephant in the room is not there for a moment, and address a question that was asked about industrial production: If its improving, isn’t that a sign of a recovering economy?
That’s a perfect example of the “Frankenstein Economy.” At this very late stage of the recovery, industrial production is still down year over year. You read that correctly, industrial production is DOWN.
How is that possible? All the news has been so good, and corporate earnings so strong?
It turns out that all the production improvement, according to Ned Davis Research, has come from just three sectors: Technology (+25%), Automotive (+22%) and Energy (+5.5%).
Automotive is easily dismissed: 0% financings and rebates. Hardly the stuff of robust recoveries. Indeed, GM made more money last year from mortgages than from selling cars. So if this recovery is for real, and interest rates tick up, that engine of growth is kaput.
Technology growth is partially an echo of the Y2K upgrade cycle — but that only explains some of the improvements. Some of the numbers rflect the very low comparisons in the few quarters post 9/11. There are also some real cost saving technologies out there, and they are capturing a lot of the new enterprise installations. Software has been doing much better than hardware; In my opinion, that’s because its easier to quantify cost/benefit analysis from software.
Lastly, Energy could be reflecting the increased demand due to stimulus. If the economy was dramatically improving across the boards, I suspect energy demand would be moving even higher still.
Bottom line: Core industrial production is still negative year over year. The remaining sectors — Consumer Goods, Business Equiptment, Business Supplies, and Materials — comprise 71% of industrial production. The Core Industrial Production (ex – auto, energy and tech) contracted at annual rate of -0.4% last quarter.
That’s why I am less sanguine than some of my brethren. We’ve had a terrific stimulus based run; For the recovery to be sustainable, I need to see manufacturing activity must broaden.
Source: Ned Davis Research
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.