I stumbled across an interesting piece Economist Arnold Cling posted in August, titled I Love LUCY. Cling argues (persuasively, I may add) that
The NBER’s business cycle dating committee officially stated that the latest recession began in March of 2001 and ended in November of 2001. This approach leads to three characterizations of the recession:
1. It was brief.
2. It was shallow.
3. It is over.
All of these statements are false. The recession was deep, it was long, and it is still underway. Economists and others who rely on the NBER and on indicators such as GDP growth, interest rates, or stock prices have been misled. The economy is weaker than many people realize.
That’s a powerful argument, one I haven’t seen made in the mainstream press. It dovetails nicely with my Frankenstein Economy thesis (which will be out in a few days).
Take this chart, which I have referred to many times over the past 6 months.
Nonfarm Payrolls (% change from recession end)
Source: Chart of the Day, October 8, 2003
It suggests one of two possibilities: either this recovery cycle is unique in the annals of economic history, or (as Cling suggests), it never ended.
UPDATE 10/17/2003 4:22 PM
I contacted Cling to see if his views have changed at all in the intervening time since August; He graciously wrote me back, and noted that the labor market appears to have stopped declining over the past two months. He sounds, well, if not downright optimistic, then at least less negative than before: “I hope the worst is behind us.”
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.