WSJ reporter and long time Fed watcher Greg Ip makes the observation that the Fed was somewhat less bullish this meeting than the last FOMC meeting. Their “slightly less upbeat tone” is what drove long-term bonds up, sending yields down sharply.
The attached document highlights the language change, which recognizes the continuing tepid pace of job creation. It is less of a starry eyed “jobs are right round the corner” than the prior month’s statement:
The problem the Fed faces is a Hobsons choice: “Raise rates too soon, and the recovery may be aborted. Raise them too late, and inflation may bubble back. Do it clumsily, and both markets and the Fed’s credibility could be injured.”
Fed Looks at Several Approaches It Can Take When Raising Rates
By GREG IP
Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
March 17, 2004; Page A1
Comparisons between Fed Statements
WSJ, March 17, 2004
FOMC Meeting Statement
Release Date: March 16, 2004
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.