WSJ.bmp

We’ve mentioned previously that much of the bulge bracket firms’ research is still overweighted to issue “Buy” recs (pun intended).

According to the WSJ, the NASD is finally looking into the matter. The Journal sums up the issue perfectly: “This isn’t a trick question: Is an “underperform” stock in an “outperform” industry more attractive than an “outperform” stock in an “underperform” industry?”

The upshot for investors in the meantime is this: While at some firms a “buy” actually means a stock is expected to rise in value, at others it means the stock could fall — but less than its rivals. Common are words like “underperform,” “in-line” and “peer perform.”

The Journal uses some ratings on Intel (INTC) as a somewhat humorous example:

Un-INTEL-ligible

Wall Street firms think Intel stock will do well in the next year or so, but that’s not always easy to tell from their jargon. Their definitions don’t help much. Maybe we can.

Firm Rating What they say What they mean
Bear Stearns Stock:
Outperform;

Sector: Market
Weight
"Projected to outperform analyst’s industry
coverage… . Expect the industry to perform approximately in line
with the primary market index."
It’ll probably do better than other semiconductor stocks,
and that industry will be an average performer.
Morgan Stanley Overweight "Return is expected to exceed the average … of the
analyst’s industry coverage … on a risk-adjusted basis."
It could go up or down, but it should do better than
rivals.
Smith Barney Buy/Medium Risk "Expected total return of 15% or more." What they said.
UBS Buy 2 "FSR is >10% above the MRA, lower degree of
predictability."
It’ll probably go up by 15%-plus (yup) over prevailing
interest rates but they’re not as sure about it as other stocks.

Source: WSJ

Simply stated, research is still too BUY oriented. Now, you have the added value of being confusing also.

UPDATE: April 27, 2004 9:10 am
Tom Brown explains why they went indie here.

Source:
A Year After Firms’ Settlement, NASD Is Launching Inquiry Into How Ratings Are Applied
Susanne Craig and Ann Davis
Wall Street Journal, April26,2004;PageC1

http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB108293059991992884,00.html

Category: Finance

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

One Response to “NASD Investigating Rating Systems”

  1. Suzanne Lawford says:

    For years I have been following your “world”, what I learned is not just what goes on in our strange planet, but much more than that; the nasty emails that you are receiving & your courage – sense of humour to handle them.It is not easy to be on the top; jealousy, stupidity,nastines…is the price. Lucky for you to have people who stand by you- who appricate you, support you, I am one of them.
    Suzanne Lawford Art Dealer