- The Big Picture - http://www.ritholtz.com/blog -
Posted By Barry Ritholtz On April 19, 2004 @ 6:04 am In Books,Finance | Comments Disabled
A hedge fund manager friend pointed me to this post from Mark Cuban’s blog . Its his forward to the book “The Number ,” by Alex Berenson, a top financial investigative reporter for The New York Times:
“If the value of a stock is what people will pay for it, then Broadcast.com was fairly valued. We were able to work with Morgan Stanley to create volume around the stock. Volume creates demand. Stocks don’t go up because companies do well or do poorly. Stocks go up and down depending on supply and demand. If a stock is marketed well enough to create more demand from buyers than there are sellers, the stock will go up. What about fundamentals? Fundamentals is a word invented by sellers to find buyers.
Price-earnings ratios, price-sales, the present value of future cash flows, pick one. Fundamentals are merely metrics created to help stockbrokers sell stocks, and to give buyers reassurance when buying stocks. Even how profits are calculated is manipulated to give confidence to buyers.
I get asked every day to invest in private companies. I always ask the same couple questions. How soon till I get my money back, and how much cash can I make from the investment? I never ask what the PE ratio will be, what the Price to Sales ratio will be. Most private investors are the same way. Heck, in Junior Achievement we were taught to return money to our investors. For some reason, as Alex points out in The Number, buyers of stocks have lost sight of the value of companies paying them cash for their investment. In today’s markets, cash isn’t earned by holding a company and collecting dividends. It’s earned by convincing someone to buy your stock from you.
If you really think of it, when a stock doesn’t pay dividends, there really isn’t a whole lot of difference between a share of stock and a baseball card. If you put your Mickey Mantle rookie card on your desk, and a share of your favorite non-dividend paying stock next to it, and let it sit there for 20 years. After 20 years you would still just have two pieces of paper sitting on your desk.
The difference in value would come from how well they were marketed. If there were millions of stockbrokers selling baseball cards, if there were financial television channels dedicated to covering the value of baseball cards with a ticker of baseball card prices streaming at the bottom, if the fund industry spent billions to tell you to buy and hold baseball cards, I am willing to bet we would talk about the fundamentals of baseball cards instead of stocks.
What matters most in buying stocks is recognizing that equities are actually commodities subject to the immediate law of supply and demand. Greater demand for stocks sends them higher; Less demand — or a greater supply (i.e., secondaries and new issues) sends them lower.
Glad we settled that issue . . .
Article printed from The Big Picture: http://www.ritholtz.com/blog
URL to article: http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2004/04/the-number/
URLs in this post:
 Mark Cuban’s blog: http://www.blogmaverick.com/entry/2252572946170125/
 The Number: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0375508805/ref=ase_thebigpictu09-20/103-2972001-5798213
Copyright © 2008 The Big Picture. All rights reserved.