We have previously dismissed suggestions that market performance rises and falls in response to either candidates polling numbers. My conclusion was that the same underlying factors were impacting both the election race and the market. This was due to the all too common analyst practice of confusing “Cause & Effect”
Now we see a diffferent take which may actually have some resonance: The variation of this theme is comparing the Incumbent’s polled approval ratings with the price consumers’ pay for Gasoline. (via Professor Pollkatz)
click for larger chart
Graphic courtesy Prof PollKatz
There seems to be a fairly high correlation between the two, with perhaps a short lag. In these issues, the question is always: “What is the correlation, and is there a causative factor?”
In the rpesent case, the expectation of an incumbent getting blamed for high energy prices passes the sniff test.
Incidentally, the good Prof has a rather elegant solution to the issue of bad or biased polling: He maintains a “Pool of polls,” with every poll result simultaneously represented. It very cleverly solves a host of problems.
Lastly, for a host of polling details, I put together a full list of Presidential Polling Data Resources.
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.