A dissapointing number this morning: Only 96,000 new jobs were added to company payrolls in September — that’s far fewer than the 145,000 consensus economists forecast.

Some curious data under the headlines in this morning’s Employment Situation report. The Establishment survey gains of 96,000 were below consensus, and well below what the 150,000 per month needed just to keep pace with population growth. Also of note: of these 96,000 jobs, only 59,000 were private sector (37k were govt.) I need to drill further into the Birth/Death adjustment (business creation/destruction) but at first glance it appears that out of those 59,000 private sector positions, ~30,000 were due the birth/death adjustment.

The Household survey shows a drop of 201,000 jobs (Hey! Where are all the Household Survey cheerleaders this month?!?); Note also that 485,000 people left the labor force — a surprsingly high number. Lastly, the BLS made specific mention of an unusal phenomenon in their release — the increase in “multiple job holders.”

Here’s a quick excerpt:

Many economists had expected the hurricanes that pummeled Florida and other areas of the Southeast to be a factor in the report, but Kathleen Utgoff, commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, said the ability to gauge the hurricanes’ effect on the jobs numbers is limited. “Overall, we do not believe that the net result of these factors materially changes the national employment situation for September, but we cannot precisely quantify the weather effect,” she said.

Friday’s report also included revised data for the period from March 2003 through March 2004. Payroll employment for that time was raised by about 236,000 jobs, according to a preliminary estimate. That number was also weaker than many forecasters had expected. President Bush’s Council of Economic Advisers had estimated that the payroll-employment figure for that period could be revised upward by 288,000 jobs, and conceivably by as much as 384,000.

Source:
BLS September Jobs Release (October 8, 2004)
Download PDF

Last Pre-Election Jobs Report Shows Modest Payroll Growth
Firms Added 96,000 Jobs in September;
Revision Finds Stronger Hiring in 2003
A WALL STREET JOURNAL ONLINE NEWS ROUNDUP
October 8, 2004 10:17 a.m.

http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB109723637861040346,00.html

Category: Finance

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

3 Responses to “Weak Jobs Number Dissappoints”

  1. BOPnews says:

    Weak Jobs Number Dissappoints

    As Stirling points out, this morning’s numbers were dissapointing: Only 96,000 new jobs were added to company payrolls in September — that’s far fewer than the 145,000 consensus economists forecast. The highly touted Household Survey shows a drop of 2…

  2. Mike says:

    Consider this too:

    Robert Brusca, chief economist at FAO Economics, says September nonfarm payroll data are “terrible” with an increase in govermment jobs masking underlying weakness in job growth. Although headline nonfarm payroll jobs grew by 96,000 in September, private sector employment only increased by 59,000 in September.

    OK, also consider that 39k of the “jobs” came from the CES Birth/Death model. I’m with Crudele on this one.

    96-59-39 = just about flat.

  3. BOPnews says:

    Employment Situation: Much worse than it looks . . .

    Yesterday, after the Jobs numbers came out, we mentioned that drilling beneath the headline numbers reveals structural problems in the labor market. This is no big surprise — we have continually commented that in a post-bubble environment, Economists …