- The Big Picture - http://www.ritholtz.com/blog -
Posted By Barry Ritholtz On April 10, 2005 @ 7:15 am In Investing,Psychology | Comments Disabled
Ever notice how you can’t quite get everything you want? Most situations — including investments and trades — are a series of compromises.
Someone actually did a thoughtful analysis on the concept of "fixed scope, fixed timeframe, or fixed budget".
I like finding a broad concept, and then seeing if its applicable to investor psychology. And this one works: Its rare that something is a good value, low risk (comfort level), and has an imminent upside catalyst — you typically only get to pick two.
You can buy a well respected company inexpensively, but often, only when its hated. You can chase a hot momentum stock, buying it with good technical parameters, but ususally its pricey.
2 out of 3.
I liked Apple and Micromuse when they was trading near cash; Had to sit in them for a while. I had my father-in-law hold his nose and buy Phillip Morris in the teens (it was hated). And the major oils (Amoco and Philips) took forever before a catalyst (take over) occurred. Even Housing stocks — still cheap, good charts — have no comfort level.
You get the idea.
You can see the complete discussions here:
Pick two  (Jason Kottke)
Getting Real: Pick two – scope, timeframe, or budget  (Jason Fried)
Be sure to read the extensive and intelligent comments . . .
Article printed from The Big Picture: http://www.ritholtz.com/blog
URL to article: http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2005/04/pick-two/
URLs in this post:
 Pick two: http://www.kottke.org/05/04/pick-two
 Getting Real: Pick two – scope, timeframe, or budget: http://37signals.com/svn/archives2/2005/04/getting_real_pi.php
Copyright © 2008 The Big Picture. All rights reserved.