The resiliency of consumer spending in the face of
high-energy prices has surprised many observers. The modest impact high-energy
prices has had on spending has been mustered by some economists as proof of the
resiliency of the economy. If $65 Barrel Oil doesn’t hurt spending, than this must
be a robust economy, they argued.

Unfortunately, that issue has now been resolved – to the
downside. With Target’s announcement last week, and Wal-Mart’s dour guidance
this morning, there can be little doubt that high-energy prices are impacting
consumer spending.

Up until now, the negative economic drag has been hidden by
the bifurcated nature of U.S. consumer. High gas prices may be a mere annoyance
to the high-end shopper (Tiffany, Neiman Marcus, Coach), but to consumers who
frequent the discounters (Costco, BJs, Wal-Mart and Target) the added energy
expense significantly crimps spending. Budget-minded shoppers simply cannot
shrug off $3/gal gasoline.

We’ve argued that energy prices, adjusted for inflation, are relatively cheap. However, the chart nearby has given us reason to rethink that position. By inflation
adjusting Gasoline prices going back to 1920 (rather than Oil just to the
1970s), makes gas prices appears rather dear.

This implies that the 1930s price hikes and the even more
significant 1970s spike were aberrations, caused by factors other than supply.
It makes one wonder whether the 2003-05 run up is similarly aberrational and
unsustainable. The problem in reaching this conclusion is whether we are on the
backside of the Peak Oil slope, or how an eventual mean reversion can bring
prices back towards “normal.”

I expect that Oil prices will revert – at least partially -
towards prior altitudes once demand drops from the current amount. We
previously mentioned  an excess of Fed tightening will likely induce a real estate
slow down, and that could cause a hard landing. The end result of that slow
down will be reduced demand for Oil, and lower fuel prices.

Looking once again at this chart, we note that historically,
it takes a long interval before gas prices see that mean price reversion
towards previous prices. The two major spikes (1930s, and 1970s) each took the
better half of a decade to retrace.

With Oil prices at present still in an
uptrend, this implies that real prices of oil at $30/barrel may be a phenomenon
no sooner than 2010.

Category: Commodities, Economy

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

4 Responses to “Energy Finally Dragging Down Spending”

  1. spencer says:

    The spike in the 1930s probably was caused by general deflation — not rising oil prices.

  2. Greg says:

    Keep in mind that the price spikes of the 1970′s were supply driven (oil embargo) whereas the current spikes are being driven by demand, a much more sustainable and potentially problematic development for the economy.

  3. Tony says:

    I surmise that the price of oil is rising because of supply, demand, and future traders.

  4. Lord says:

    I believe the spike in the 30s was the government providing price floors and adding taxes to deal with the glut of oil discoveries at the time.