Yesterday’s WSJ has an interesting discussion about a new music industry business model, using the The Pussycat Dolls as the prime example. The key takeaway is the potential revenue from ancillary lines of business.

Here’s your ubiq-cerpt:™

"The Pussycat Dolls aren’t due to release their first album until
next month, but they’ve already got the No. 1 song on Billboard magazine’s Pop
100 chart — plus their own makeup line and a Las Vegas nightclub. A clothing
line, a possible reality television show and more nightclubs are in the

The new, all-female pop group’s far-flung endeavors are a
departure from standard music-industry practice. The Pussycat Dolls’ record
company, A&M-Interscope, is an equal financial partner in any money-making
enterprise the group participates in, from touring to TV.

Interscope last year created a company it jointly owns with the
Dolls, which at the time wasn’t a pop group at all, but rather a long-running
Los Angeles dance troupe that performed a burlesque routine at nightclubs and
events. Now the Dolls consist of six members who record and tour and another
eight-member troupe that performs in Las Vegas.

Normally, music companies make money only by selling their acts’
recordings, whether on compact disc or as digital downloads. Music labels
typically don’t see any direct benefit from concerts, movie appearances or ads
in which a performer appears. Past manufactured pop groups, such as the
Backstreet Boys, were usually created not by their record labels but by their
managers, who primarily reaped the profits from promotional activities.

As recorded-music sales have plummeted in recent years –
due to excessive pricing, weak offerings, lack of consumer interest, and competition from other entertainment
there has been a search for alternative sources of

And, its beyond the usual touring and t-shirts. Call it more than Merch:

"One of the most relevant words in the music business today is
‘ancillary,’ " says Jeff Haddad, the Pussycat Dolls’ manager. "It’s no longer
strictly music."


Pussycat Dolls, Music Label Share All Profits in Novel Deal
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, August 26, 2005; Page B1,,SB112501337985823631,00.html

Category: Finance, Intellectual Property, Music

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

4 Responses to “New Music Business Model: Ancillary Revenues”

  1. Jason says:

    So let me get this straight: The new music business model is take the pre-fab boy band model to its extreme, making the “acts” not musicians or artists so much as subsidiary corporations of their record labels, designed not to make music but rather for ease of insertion into any media outlet? Color me bored and depressed….

  2. You got it.

    Sounds like a formula for the renaissance of music, no?

    Is it any wonder sales have dropped off a cliff?

  3. Anon Y. Mouse says:

    In the case of the Pussycat Dolls, one could well
    argue that the music is an ancillary business.

    I agree.

  4. Cece says:

    Yall freaken rock Love ya kiss kiss………………………..