My earliest mentor in Technical Analysis was Guy Ortmann. He’s is a pure technician, and now works for Capital Growth Financial as their Technical Analyst. Early in my career, when I was the Research Assistant to the Chief Technology Strategist at Prime Charter (now Oppenheimer), Guy rescued me.
Guy opines today that "recent events have established a SIGNIFICANT FLOOR in the equity markets on a technical basis that is also supported by a major fundamental indicator. The major support levels for the various indexes as described on the above charts are 10,400 for the Dow Industrials, 1210 for the SPX and 2100 on the Nasdaq."
Similar to the chart I showed Tuesday, Guy looks at the recent up-trends and support levels:
"What we believe is of primary importance is HOW THE MARKETS HAVE RESPONDED to the recent events surrounding Katrina. The week prior to Labor Day weekend was laden with some of the most horrific news stories in terms of human tragedy, and potential economic impact since 9/11/01. With the fear of a loss of a major oil off-loading port, loss of a significant percentage of oil drilling and refining capacities, and the potential costs of rebuilding an entire city THE MARKETS FAILED TO BREAK DOWN IN THE FACE OF ONE OF OUR COUNTRY’S WORST NATURAL DISASTERS OF ALL TIME. As far as the markets are concerned, what is frequently more important is how the markets RESPOND to news events as opposed to the news events themselves. The fact that the averages were able to withstand the pressure of the news with such strength and resiliency is, we feel, an indication of the underlying health of the markets. Fear was extremely high as expressed by a large increase in put buying on the averages prior to the Labor Day weekend. Yet, upon our return to work the following Tuesday, the markets enjoyed on of their best performance days of the year. The crowd was again on the wrong side of the fence."
That’s a persuasive argument; the only disagreement I have with Guy is the "Why?"
Guy believes its a question of valuation; He favors the IBES valuation model (also known as the Fed Model) which compares the forward earnings yield of the S&P 500 to the yield on the 10 year Treasury note.
I, on the other hand, believe the market was in good technical condition prior to Katrina — the Valuation side of this is all but irrelevant to recent action. Further, I don’t see how the IBES methodology can explain why the Market got shellacked from January to May, when rates were lower and prices were higher. Just because something is cheap, don’t mean it won’t get cheaper.
Regardless, if you buy the Technicals argument — his or mine — then you would expect the markets to find support at the trend lines shown above . . .
Category: Technical Analysis
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.