The WSJ:

The Sept. 20 statement announced that the Fed was raising its key short-term interest rate by one-quarter point to 3.75%, its 11th straight increase, despite uncertainty about the economic impact of Hurricane Katrina. The storm hurt near-term economic growth, which normally would call for lower interest rates. But it also has elevated inflationary pressure, which normally would call for higher rates.

>

Infofedparse0509

>

Source:
PARSING THE FED
Weathering the Storm
WSJ, September 20, 2005
http://online.wsj.com/documents/info-fedparse0509.html

Category: Economy, Fixed Income/Interest Rates

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

2 Responses to “Parsing the Fed”

  1. Larry Nusbaum, Scottsdale says:

    “But it also has elevated inflationary pressure, which normally would call for higher rates.”

    No fair! I claim foul! Why does he get to count food and energy and we don’t? NO FAIR! *wa wa*

  2. Chad K says:

    So it begs the question… is helping the economy get through a rough patch more important than slowing inflation?

    I wonder if they have any stats on how much more pain inflation would cause if the rate increase was postponed ’til their next meeting versus How much pain will an economic downturn cost in earnings, gdp, overall national prosperity.

    People with jobs might say inflation is more important to keep in check, while people looking for jobs would say economic growth is… and I personally don’t know what the right answer is…

    any hints?