We have had robust reflation/inflation ever since the Fed took rates down to half century lows, and then left them there for quite a while. Each time I mention this, some dang fool insists its just energy, depsite the evidence that food, commodities, precious metals, heath care insurance, industrial metals, medical care, housing costs, education, etc. are all higher in price than they were.
Today, we add yet another category of goods that hve been going up in price: construction materials.
Ken Simonson, chief economist for The Associated General Contractors of America, issued an analysis this week that compared construction costs over a four-year period from 2001 to 2005 . . .
By September of 2004, steel and copper construction products had soared as much as 62 percent higher than a year earlier.
Overall, construction material cost climbed about 11 percent in the 12 months ended this past September.
What’s on the construction list price increases?
Gypsum products were up 21 percent;
asphalt had climbed 12 percent;
insulation materials rose 11 percent;
lumber up 12 percent;
steel and copper construction products up 62 percent;
PVC plastic up "almost" 100%;
gypsum — double-digit increase;
concrete prices: plus seven percent from 9/03 – 9/04; more than 12% 9/04 – 9/05;
Diesel fuel up more than 50 percent;
Cement: rising prices and spot shortages;
The diesel expenses "hit contractors hard. Not only did they have to pay more to run their own trucks, bulldozers, backhoes, and generators, they also had to pay more for fuel-thirsty materials such as concrete, which burns considerable energy while being mixed and transported in heavy loads to sites."
The only bright spots: Lumber, which thanks to hurricane-downed trees is abundant (and relatively cheap) — and labor, whose costs have risen less than 3%
Construction costs building steam
Contractors’ group says prices for concrete and other materials have soared the past two years.
October 27, 2005: 2:03 PM EDT, CNN/Money staff writer
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.