Today, I played the role of skeptic — and Man, did I hit for the cycle with today’s CPI comments –  they were picked up by Dow Jones, Briefing.com, 2 separate WSJ articles, and the Atlanta Journal Constitution.

Here’s most of today’s news cycle:

Briefing.com:

Maxim Group’s
Barry Ritholtz weighed in with his always entertaining take on the
data
… "So let me make sure I understand this: U.S. consumer prices
rose at the fastest pace in 25 years, and that is somehow a positive for the
economy and/or the markets?" He notes that the core price up 0.1% "To me, this
means that there’s little ability to pass along producer price increases to the
consumer. This will inexorably lead to margin squeezes, and sure as day follows
night, that will impact earnings negatively."

 

On
the housing component, with "Housing Prices at all time highs and the
affordability index at 14 year lows, we see that ‘Owner Equivalent Rent’ is up a
mere +.1%. Need I detail how silly this is? Home prices are up dramatically, and
recently we see that [mortgage] rates have ticked up significantly…" 

 

The bright
spot: worker earnings relative to inflation?
"They fell, as the Labor
Department reported ‘real average weekly earnings of U.S. workers, adjusted for
inflation, fell 1.2% in September.’ That marks the third consecutive monthly
decline of real wages…So the only place where there is no inflation is
in the pocketbooks of the consumer
, whom I must remind you accounts for
70% of the economy."

Dow Jones Market Talk:

Well, If You Exclude Oil, You See…

"The CPI report’s implications create its usual ardent debate, as the core and overall camps hash it out. "So let me make sure I understand this," strategist Barry Ritholtz of Maxim Group writes on the Web site Big Picture.

U.S. consumer prices rose at the fastest pace in 25 years, and that is somehow a positive for the economy and/or markets

But Merrill Lynch economist David Rosenberg calls the core figure benign and says the softer read is bullish for bonds, and should soothe concerns about inflation at the Fed."
>

The WSJ Online (The Afternoon Report): 

If what was being experienced in the late 1970s was "malaise,"
then the initial reaction to the consumer inflation data struck some as
giddiness. "So let me make sure I understand this," groaned Barry Ritholtz,
chief market strategist at the Maxim Group, in a comment this morning. "U.S.
consumer prices rose at the fastest pace in 25 years, and that is somehow a
positive for the economy and/or the markets? Puh-leeze."

The WSJ (TODAY’S MARKETS):

"But
some analysts scoffed at the notion that inflation is benign. "Back out
inflation and there’s no inflation," said Barry Ritholtz, chief market
strategist at Maxim Group. Crude-oil prices "have been going up in
price for three years, housing prices are at a high, food prices are up
and medical care has gone up significantly."

Most investors
still have faith in the core data, however. Gordon Fowler, chief
investment officer at Glenmede Trust, said the core CPI number is "the
best measure of when inflation gets embedded in the economy."

MarketWatch

The CPI report also showed that the cost of owning a home rose 0.1% in September. "Need I detail how silly this is?" said Barry Ritholtz, chief market strategist for Maxim Group. "Home prices are up dramatically, and recently we see that mortgage rates have ticked up significantly.

>

Sources:
Eye on the Core
DAVID A. GAFFEN, The Afternoon Report
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ONLINE, October 14, 2005 1:50 p.m.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB112930386666268863.html

Stocks Rise on Oil, CPI Data
GE’s Earnings, Oil’s Slide Help Market Turnaround
SCOTT PATTERSON, TODAY’S MARKETS
WSJ, October 14, 2005 4:23 p.m.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB112928898147468720.html

After Katrina, two economies
Economic data show devastation, but underlying strength
Rex Nutting
MarketWatch, 1:35 PM ET Oct. 14, 2005
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%
7B863AAC47-93F8-4600-B400-B23F2A37CC6A%7D&siteid=google

Category: Financial Press

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

One Response to “Well, If You Exclude Oil, You See…”

  1. calmo says:

    We are in better hands than I thought: some of the media heavies are reading you. And not a few blogs too.