Well, the new Business Week is out. Its the special year in preview forecast edition. I am participating in it again this year.
You may be wondering why someone who believes that "Forecast is Folly" and has exhorted you to "Be Neither a Bull nor a Bear" ended up as the outlier — I was low man on the totem pole in terms of both US Equity expectations and recommended U.S. Equity exposure — in the survey of 75 strategists, economists and analysts.
I plan on addressing this extensively in the New Year. If you are a regular reader of this site, you should be well aware of what my concerns are. I will lay out the full Bear case (in painful details) the first week of the year, along with the corresponding counter arguments. From these you may draw your own conclusions.
Meanwhile, here’s something for my fellow data freaks out there. I massaged all of the market call data (ever so painfully) into an Excel Spreadsheet — BusinessWeek 2006 Forecasts.xls.
I’d love to see what y’all can do generating studies and charts from the data. As an example, have a look at what Tim Iacono of TheMessThatGreenspanMade pulled together from it. I’ll take the most informative and intriguing charts and post them in this space after the holidays.
One emailer asked me "how much confidence do I have" in my market call. Given the philosophical expectations I approach all trading postions with — a specific attitude that I Expect to Be Wrong — my answer may not surprise you: Not very much.
However, I do have more confidence in my own call (with all expectations that I may be wrong) then that of the very Bullish herd.
The BusinessWeek Market Survey: Where to Invest
December 26, 2005
The BusinessWeek Market Survey (PDF)
Businessweek market survey 2006.pdf
2006 INVESTMENT OUTLOOK
The Folly of Forecasting
6/7/2005 1:05 PM EDT
Bull or Bear? Neither
4/26/2005 7:20 AM EDT
Expect to Be Wrong
4/5/2005 7:15 AM EDT
Category: Financial Press
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.