Back on December 1, I mentioned that "Holiday sales increases can be in the 3 to 4% range." This modestly Bullish call was at the very low end of Wall Street projections.
The prime motivation for that range was the decreasing gasoline prices post Katrina, and the love affair with Plasma Screen TVs (that was the good news). Keeping the Bullishness modest was the negative real income for the middle class; on the other end, the increasing take home pay for the ultra wealthy supported the relative strength of the luxury retailer.
The WSJ reports that "overall, Retail Sales rose 3.2%." And, the big winners were the luxury stores. Its a pleasant surprise anytime projections like this end up that accurate.
I also wish to remind you (again) how the silly NRF projection of 22% was; Their absurdity was a statistical abomination (and they were chastised in this space for it)
Here’s the Journal’s summary:
Holiday shoppers spent big on a few products last month, but held out for last-minute deals, resulting in mixed performances from U.S. retailers. Cash registers rang at luxury retailers and teen specialty shops, but sales at Wal-Mart Stores Inc. disappointed.
Overall, sales at stores open at least a year, a measure known as same-store sales, rose 3.2% in December from a year earlier, according to an index of 66 chains compiled by the International Council of Shopping Centers. The trade group, based in New York, had expected same-stores sales growth between 3% and 3.5%. According to the tally, same-store sales at luxury stores grew 6.4%, while discounters ticked up just 2.6%.
"All combined it was good, not great," said Jeff Klinefelter, senior research analyst at Piper Jaffray. "When we finally got the last-minute rush, it was the higher-end consumer that followed through with spending."
Luxury Stores Were Holidays’ Stars
Overall Retail Sales Rose 3.2%, Slowed by Discounters; Holdout Shoppers Also Hurt
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL,January 6, 2006; Page A2
Mixed Stockings for Retailers
See the WSJ’s retailer chart here:
The WSJ: DECEMBER RETAIL SALES: Mixed Stockings for Retailers
Holiday shoppers spent big on a few products last month, but held out for last-minute deals, resulting in mixed performances from U.S. retailers. Here’s a look at how a selection of major retailers performed. Updated Jan. 6, 2006. Note: Several major retailers don’t report monthly sales numbers.
|Abercrombie||Teen retailer||29.0%||Has largely avoided deep discounting; says preview of spring collection also helped|
|Aeropostale||Teen retailer||11.4%||Assortment, "creative sales promotions" put sales, gross margins above goals|
|AnnTaylor||Clothing retailer||1.5%||Sales were somewhat lower than expected at namesake chain; sweaters did well|
|Barnes & Noble||Book seller||2.3%||Biography, history segments did well; individual standouts included "A Million Little Pieces" by James Frey and "Teacher Man: A Memoir" by Frank McCourt|
|Best Buy||Electronics, computer retailer||5.8%||Triple-digit comparable store sales gain in flat-panel TVs|
|Circuit City||Electronics, computer retailer||10.8%||"Significant strength" in flat-panel TVs, MP3 players, notebook computers|
|Federated Department Stores||Department store||3.4%||Pleased with Macy’s, Bloomingdale’s despite New York transit strike|
|Gap Inc.||Clothing retailer||-9%||Weak traffic at Gap, Banana Republic and Old Navy; but fewer markdowns than last year|
|Guess?||Jeans, clothing seller||17.5%||Total sales for quarter were up 25.6%|
|Hot Topic||Teen retailer||-6.2%||Weak traffic in first three weeks of December; poor men’s, accessories sales.|
|J.C. Penney||Department store||2.2%||Best performance in women’s accessories, children’s apparel and family shoes|
|Jos. A. Bank Clothiers||Men’s clothing||20.7%||"Particular strength" in blazers, sportcoats, sportswear. Strong Internet/catalog sales|
|Kmart*||Discount retailer||1%||Higher apparel sales at Kmart were partially offset by a decline in home goods|
|Kohl’s||Clothing retailer||4.6%||Last two weeks were good, but November-December period was below its hopes|
|Limited Brands||Clothing retailer||3%||Victoria’s Secret was strong; but Limited was hurt by weak sales of pants and sweaters|
|Men’s Wearhouse||Men’s clothing||8.1%||U.S. sales increases outpace Canada|
|Neiman Marcus||Department store||8.6%||Women’s contemporary sportswear and designer apparel, jewelry, performed well|
|Nordstrom||Department store||7.7%||Strong sales of women’s shoes, cosmetics, accessories and menswear|
|Payless Shoesource||Shoe retailer||-1.5%||December results hurt by stronger than expected November sales|
|Pier 1 Imports||Specialty retailer||-4.8%||Early period sales were weak but improved during the last two weeks of December|
|Sears*||General, home-improvement, appliances||-11.9%||Apparel sales were poor, reflecting "weaker-than-anticipated customer response to fashion offerings."|
|Sharper Image||Gadgets seller||-15.0%||Its key air purifiers and massage chairs continued year-over-year declines in sales|
|Talbots||Women’s clothing||1.1%||Internet and gift-card sales have improved|
|Target||Discount retailer||4.7%||"Pleased" with results, "comfortable" with outlook, inventory in good shape|
|TJX||Clothing retailer||6.0%||Parent of T.J. Maxx and Marshalls saw sales surge during the week of Christmas.|
|Urban Outfitters||Clothing retailer||6.0%||Urban Outfitters chain’s sales were "robust, but Anthropologie, up just 2%, was "below plan"|
|Wal-Mart||Discount retailer||2.2%||Weak results mean fourth-quarter profit will come in at low end of its projection|
|Walgreen||Drugstore chain||6.2%||Pharmacy sales drive increase|
|Wet Seal||Teen retailer||38.5%||"Very pleased" with strong sales; says is 12th straight same-store sales rise|
|Wilsons The Leather Experts||Leather goods retailer||-7.7%||Improvement in margins is expected to offset some of sales weakness|
|Zumiez||Action-apparel retailer||20.9%||Raises earnings guidance|
* Sears and Kmart figures are for nine-week period ended Dec. 31. Both are both units of Sears Holdings Corp.
Source: Dow Jones Newswires, the companies
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.