More absurdity from the people who ruined an otherwise adequate indicator:
"Six of the 10 indicators that make up the index registered increases last month: consumer expectations, real money supply, average weekly unemployment claims, stock prices, the interest-rate spread and manufacturers’ new orders for consumer goods. Orders for nondefense capital goods, building permits, vendor performance and average weekly manufacturing hours were negative contributors to the index.
The Conference Board index that measures current economic activity — which reflects data on nonagricultural payroll, personal income and industrial production — increased 0.2% after rising 0.4% in November. The lagging-indicators measure rose 0.1% after the previous month’s advance of 0.5%.
Let me hasten to point out the absurdity of this data point: The yield curve inverted in December, and this is somehow economically stimulative? That’s like saying cigarette smoking is cardiovascular ewercise, and deep fried pork rinds are health foods.
No wonder a survey of economists found the LEI to be the least important economic indicator.
UPDATE January 24, 2006 10:45am
On the train in this morning, I was turning over the LEI numbers in my head — they simply didn’t add up.
So I laboriously entered them into an Excel Spread sheet, and The Conference Board reported that six of the ten indicators that make up the leading index increased in December.
I’m having someone double check my work — but at first glance, it looks like LEI’s actually shrank;
Of course, the absurdity of the Interest rate spread is front and center. It flattened from 0.54 down to 0.31 (ignore the inversion, these are monthly figures). That represents a -42.59% decrease in interest rate spread — and somehow, we are supposed to believe this is a positive for the economy? Puh-leeze...
Economic Gauges Indicate Strength In Months Ahead
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, January 24, 2006
Business Cycle Indicators: LEI
Complete press release
Released: Monday, January 23, 2006
Category: Data Analysis
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.