I get a phone call from The Daily Show (yes, that Daily Show) — about an appearance for a show next week on Alan Greenspan’s retirement!
Who is this really? One of my buds pulling my chain? (That f&*%ing Cody!)
No, its Sarah from the Daily Show — email me at
XXXX@XXXXXXX.com if you don’t believe me.
Holy Snikeys! This is awesome! I saw Jon Stewart doing stand up years ago! Is there a funnier religious joke than his Yom Kippur versus Lent riff? I even met him at some Manhattan fund raiser a dozen years ago. And I love the The Daily Show!
Hell, yes! I’d love to do the show!
Sara tells me they are doing a segment on Greenspan’s retirement, and wanted some Wall Streeters to comment on the Maestro. You know, nice retirement type things.
Sigh . . . Alas, I tell the producer the truth: While I think the Federal Reserve Chief is an impossible position, Greenspan has done a lousy job with it. The Stock Market bubble, the Housing Debt explosion, etc. He is like a doctor whose solution to any malady is to give the patient some candy. You feel good for the moment, but its rotting your teeth out of your head. While I cannot blame all of our economic woes on the Fed Chair, his 2 decades of easy money has made a bad situation worse. In short, he has created a mess.
Thanks anyway, she says, but we want someone a little more pro-Greenie. If you know of anyone, please let us know.
Oh, well — I’m sure I can think of someone !
UPDATE: January 26, 2006 3:45pm
I immediately think of 3 names who can say nice things about Greenspan for the show: Larry Kudlow, James Cramer and Steve Liesman. I tag Larry and Jim’s assistants, and shoot an email to The Daily Show. They’d rather have a non-economist — so there goes Kudlow or Liesman.
They go with Mad Jim. He says the shoot is alot of fun (damn!)
The segment airs Tuesday at 11pm on Comedy Central.
So close . . .
Category: Financial Press
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.