Small World: On Saturday, I mentioned problems with Citibank’s Panic/Euphoria sentiment measure.
Then, I discussed the work of James Montier of Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein (DrKW) yesterday, (Seven Sins of Fund Management). This was the first time I ever mentioned him.
By coincidence, I read about a Fear/Greed indicator last night from the very same James Montier in Thoughts from the Frontline (which coincidentally references my earlier discussion of Northern Trust’s Paul Kasriel). How’s that for convoluted circles?
Anyway, here we are less than 2.4% from recent highs, and Montier’s sentiment readings does not shows panic (like Citi’s Lefkovich’s does) — but rather, reveals irrational exuberance: The index has only reached
this level of greed in September of 1987 and May of 1996.
DrKW Fear and Greed Index
click for larger graph
Source: Thoughts from the Frontline
Montier notes this is a measure of Risk appetite:
“It is really a measure of relative risk
adjusted momentum between global equities and bonds. When the risk adjusted
performance of equities is high relative to the risk adjusted performance of
bonds, then investors start to forget about the concept of risk altogether; they
become totally focused on return. Irrational exuberance reigns (shown as a
reading of above 1 in the chart below).”
“In contrast, when bonds have performed well in risk adjusted terms relative to
equities, investors tend to forget that things will generally get better at some
point, so this creates the ‘end of the world is nigh’ kind of feeling (a reading
of -2 in the chart below). Effectively, the measure captures the tendency
towards extrapolation of the recent past/current situation into the indefinite
future. Thus it serves as a contrary indicator.”
John Mauldin adds that in 1996, the DrKW Fear/Greed indicator went off the charts — but the markets were still going up:
“So why even bring it up? Because we have other flashing lights going off in our list of indicators. As we discussed for the last two weeks, real hourly earnings and real consumer spending are slowing down, which is a very good indicator of a future slowing of the US economy. And the yield curve is starting to invert (more later). We are getting signals that should make investors more cautious, yet they are becoming even less so!
Neither consumer spending nor the yield curve were showing “issues” in 1996. On balance, greed was a good thing back then.”
John does mention that the Fear & Greed Index “seems to nail the bottoms, but we are nowhere near a bottom.”
All ths raises one question: if there were no confirming signals in the 1996 DrKW’s indicator highs, what other confirms were there in 1987? I asked John, and will update this post as soon as I hear back from him.
Greed by Four Lengths
Thoughts from the Frontline, February 10, 2006
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.