If risk-free returns on CDs have been returning performance equivalent to risk-laden returns on S&P500, the question some investors are asking themselves is "Why take the risk?"
That’s the issue Justin Lahart explores (inadvertantly) when exploring the issue of how low rates actually are:
"Even though the Federal Reserve has been raising rates since June 2004,
they’re low historically. Over the past 50 years, the fed-funds rate
(the main overnight rate the Fed controls) has averaged 5.75%. Today’s
[4.5%] hardly seems onerous . . .
Ed Hyman, chief economist at research firm ISI Group, points out that those low, long-term yields are also a signal that returns on other investments are expected to be low.
Consider stocks. Last year, the S&P 500 index had a total return (including dividends) of 4.9%. Meantime, the average rate on a six-month certificate of deposit was 4.6% in December. They’re so close, you can imagine investors socking a bit more money in (safer) CDs and a bit less in (riskier) stocks.
These low expected returns have ramifications on economic prospects. It gives companies less reason to spend money on the equipment or new hires to expand. It gives venture capitalists less reason to fund budding businesses. In short, it discourages investment, and makes economic growth harder to come by as a result.
Today’s low short-term rates may be plenty high."
Interesting stuff . . .
AHEAD OF THE TAPE
By JUSTIN LAHART
January 11, 2006; Page C1
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.