have been wanting to address for some time now is the tendency amongst many market observers to “anthropomorphize” one’s relationship with market and economic data. For
example, I recently read this sentence: “If you want to look at the following chart and be
depressed, then be my guest.”
This is problematic. In the
Apprenticed Investor series, I have repeatedly cautioned against having
an emotional relationship with any company, stock, or even an econometric
A data point
shouldn’t make you depressed or elated – all it should do is make you
intellectually curious as to how this fits into the larger picture. It should
Investors should get
no more excited about Non-farm Payrolls or CPI or New Homes Sales than they should
the summer solstice. It is a periodic phenomena, and your job as the steward of
your own finances is to put it into the proper context.
I try to interpret
events accurately, especially within the context of how most of Wall Street and
the financial media covers economic and market events. I hope I am not tilting at windmills. Too many investors rely on
misleading headlines, they fall prey to faulty interpretations, or they overlook major issues.
leads me to stake out positions some have called contrarian; others have termed it
pessimistic or excessively negative. I find it to be neither.
It is not negative
to say it will dark out at night, nor is it pessimistic to point out that up
north, it is often cold and snowy in the winter. That’s how I read the data, as
cyclical phenomena that gets better and worse on a periodic basis; It ain’t
called the Business “Cycle” for nuthin’.
These have led me in the past to:
-Rail on (and on) about inflation, while for the longest time, most of Wall Street ignored it;
Describe this jobs recovery as sub-par, while the Street raved about it;
Identify option expenses as significant threat to Prices (based on
- Positively discussed the impact of accelerated
depreciation of capital spending;
Describe Real Estate as an over-extended asset class – but not a
Place double digit earnings growth, dividend increases, share buybacks and
M&A activity into proper context.
An investor should
be neither a cheerleader nor a jeerleader. However, given the overwhelming
bullish bias of Wall Street, and the tendency of people to take headlines at
their face value, I often find myself pushing back against the mainstream, if
only to put these things into context.
This is not
pessimistic – it is pragmatic.
Its opposite – dogma – is a great enemy of investors.
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.