From this week’s Barron’s, comes the latest bit of fiscal dishonesty from the White House:
"THIS SPACE DOESN’T USUALLY INDULGE in advice to the ailing. But we feel compelled by a revelation that came to light last week to do so, even though we lack even the most rudimentary medical training. (If it helps our credibility any here, we might note we’re a faithful reader of the New England Journal of Medicine; the pictures aren’t much, but some of the text — at least that part of it we can understand; we can’t speak for the rest — is unfailingly informative.)
Enough of disclaimers. Let’s get to the heart of the matter. Our advice is simple: Don’t get sick in the last nine of the days of Uncle Sam’s fiscal year; and if you’re already sick, for gosh sakes, don’t get sicker. Especially if you happen to be a geezer, or have the bad luck to be disabled.
This exhortation is not based on any new medical research or even quack notion, and it has absolutely nothing to do with any seasonal blips in the incidence of disease. Instead — and here’s the beauty of it — it springs from cold, hard logic, derived from last week’s disclosure of some smarmy accounting sleight of hand that the Bush administration plans to indulge in so as to make Medicare’s deficit look better this waning fiscal year. Just the kind of manipulation, incidentally, that under Sarbanes-Oxley can land a slippery CEO or chief financial officer in the pokey.
The bureaucratic brainstorm was straightforward — simple-minded is, perhaps, a more appropriate description — don’t pay doctors, hospitals and their army of auxiliaries tending to indisposed old folks and the afflicted disabled for their labors in the last nine days of the current fiscal year. Instead, send them a check for what you owe them, sometime after the first of October, the start of the government’s fiscal ’07. In essence, those doctors, hospitals et al. are making an involuntary loan of nine days’ pay without interest.
That way, point out the gleeful budgeteers and Medicare pooh-bahs, all of whom presumably are glowing with health, Uncle Sam’s Medicare tab this fading fiscal year will be $5.2 billion less than it otherwise would have been. Or at least would seem to be $5.2 billion less — in Washington, as we all know, appearance and reality are not invariably the same phenomena.
Of course, this oh-so-clever stratagem would mean that next fiscal year’s Medicare bill will be $5.2 billion more than it would have been. But, not to worry, those indefatigable financial watchdogs in the Office of Management and Budget and their henchmen in the uppermost reaches of Medicare are on the case. And we have every confidence that next year they’ll make up for any untoward increases in costs by ceasing to send checks to doctors, hospitals et al. in August or even July, if necessary.
It’s never too early for the prudent sickie to begin to prepare for the worst and do everything in his or her power not to allow his or her condition to grow worse toward the end of the fiscal year. Get used to waiting until the start of the new fiscal year before letting it all hang out.
For it ineluctably follows that the doctors and their cohorts might feel some inhibiting hesitation about putting in an often onerous day’s work for the promise of payment later. In the circumstances, who can blame them if they decide en masse to shut down their offices for the summer? And wasn’t it the president, himself, after all, on an earlier occasion, who pointed out that government IOUs are just pieces of paper?
We have a modest counterproposal: Why not hold up the paychecks of the people in the upper echelons of the Medicare bureaucracy and at the Office of Management and Budget until the $5.2 billion target is reached? It might take more than a year or two. But, hey, they’re dedicated public servants, so we’re sure they wouldn’t mind lending the government money for such a good cause. And, no matter how long it took, they’d be paid in full — but fair’s fair, without interest."
This sort of nonsense is beyond disappointing — it is astounding . . .
The Medicare Scam
UP AND DOWN WALL STREET
Barron’s MONDAY, AUGUST 28, 2006
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.