We mentioned last week that decreasing Oil prices would bode well for the consumer — especially for the lower end consumer.
Not enough to start an entire new cycle, but a little relief that puts some jingle into their pocket.
Yesterday evening, Target tightened their September same store sales forecasts, previously a range of 3-5%; Now, the firm sees 5% same store sales gains:
"Target Corp. (TGT) said late Monday it now expects sales at stores open at least a year to rise around 5% in September, up from a previous forecast for a 3% to 5% rise.
The Minneapolis-based discount retailer’s same-store sales rose 5.6% in September 2005. Target’s same-store sales were up 2.8% in August; they’d risen 6.3% in the same month a year before."
Note, however, that the drop in Oil to the lows $60s translates as $10 or so a week to most familes. It is a welcome respite — as will be lowered natural gas prices this winter– but its not the beginning of the 1990s all over again . . .
UPDATE September 19, 2006 10:05am
This was a surprise, in light of the recent activity in fuel / energy prices:
Retailers’ sales gains during the holiday season will likely be weaker this year as consumers grapple with a stumbling housing market, according to a Washington-based trade group.
The National Retail Federation plans to announce today that it expects retail sales for November and December to increase 5% to $457.4 billion from the 2005 period. Last year, holiday sales increased 6.1%, according to the trade group, in line with its prediction for a 6% gain. Over the past decade, the industry has seen an average annual increase of 4.6%, the group said.
The forecast comes on the heels of weak back-to-school sales for many chains, which have stoked fears that a slowing housing market has begun to take its toll on middle- and upper-income U.S. consumers, who had kept spending despite soaring energy prices over the past year.
Target Lifts Same-Store-Sales Forecast For Sept
DOW JONES NEWSWIRES, September 18, 2006 6:32 p.m.
Retailers Draw a Weak Forecast for Holidays
WSJ, September 19, 2006; Page A19
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.