Barron’s Mike Santoli writes:
"It’s fashionable on Wall Street to strike a maverick’s pose and carp that "nobody" recognizes the real threat of inflation that’s being papered-over by the supposed deceit of government data pushers. Yet the just-released Merrill Lynch fund-manager survey for June shows a net 47% of respondents saying core inflation will be higher in the next year, up from a net 11% in March.
So, looking for more inflation is anything but a contrarian stance. And if there’s a buildup of inflationary danger, it’s in the process of being absorbed by the market."
Mike raises an interesting point here about the crowd’s view of inflation: What once was the subversive contrary stance — Inflation is stronger than reported, and the BLS data is "uninformative" — has gained traction amongst alot of the crowd.
As he notes above, most of Wall St economist’s think inflation is low and going higher.
My view is the precise opposite of that: Inflation HAS been high, and its likely to go lower as the economy decelerates.
I’m not sure why that cadre of economists thinks core inflation is going up — unless they are convinced the 2H acceleration is on schedule (despite the recent CFO survey saying they are cutting back on Cap Ex and hiring).
Perhaps its due to China, the supposed exporter of Deflation, is now exporting Inflation.
The very obvious slowing of GDP should certainly shave off some CPi/PPi inflation pressures — but that doesn’t change the reality that inflation is higher than has been reported. And if the crowd has finally discovered that, well, its about time.
I never attempt to be contrarian for its own sake — but I do like to know how "built in" my views are. And Mike raises a valid issue . . .
Barron’s, June 18, 2007
China’s Inflation Accelerates, Adding Rate Pressure
By Nipa Piboontanasawat,
Bloomberg, March 13 2007
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.