As if the "well-contained subprime mortage" issue wasn’t adding enough volatility, today is the Russell Indices rebalancing.
Newly re-constructed Russell indices (Global, 1000, 2000, 3000 and Microcap) will take effect after the the NYSE close at 4pm. Based on preliminary Russell information, 154 NYSE-stocks will be added or deleted to the indices.
This tends to play a little havoc with prices, above and beyond today’s volatility.
We most recently looked at the S&P500 trivia on the occasion of their 50th anniversary. Here is some Russell trivia:
• The Russell 3000 (combined market cap) reflects about 98% of the investable U.S. equity universe, increased more than $3 trillion (from $15.3 to $18.5 trillion).
• The Russell Global Index includes more than 10,700 stocks from 63 countries.
• Countries with the largest number of additional companies joining the index include Australia (109), the United Kingdom (93), Hong Kong (92), Canada (90) and India (66).
• There are 277 "additions" for the Russell 3000 — more than last year’s 237 additions, but far less than the 10-year average of 405.
• A third of this year’s additions are in two sectors: financial services (57) and health care (48).
• Sector changes (weighting):
-Energy services sector will increase (3.9% to 4.6%)
-Health care sector will decline (12.1% to 11.9%).
-Financial services (22.4%) and Consumer discretionary (13.4%) are the largest sectors.
• Turnover is between 2% and 2.5%,
• A total of 128 IPOs will join the Russell 3000 this year; In 2006 new IPO adds = 122; In 2003, it was = 28.
• Of the 310 companies going into the Russell Microcap Index, 67 are dropping into the index from the Russell 3000.
• 184 companies will completely leave the Russell’s index universe entirely.
The final membership lists for the Russell 3000, Russell 2000 and Russell 1000® will be posted June 25.
UPDATE: June 24, 2007 7:11am
Russell Set to Restock U.S. and Global Indexes
Tacoma, WA — June 11, 2007
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.