<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Repeat After Me: Spending Surveys Are Meaningless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/10/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/10/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:46:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rebound</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/10/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/comment-page-1/#comment-47616</link>
		<dc:creator>rebound</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2007/10/16/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/#comment-47616</guid>
		<description>JustAGuy is SPOT ON.  Reporting &quot;the number&quot; is just shoveling useless data ... in effect parroting it.  Putting &quot;the number&quot;  in context helps provide actual information ... which I thought was supposed to be the primary &quot;product&quot; cranked out by so called journalists. Right now is seems like there are simply mouth pieces (or glam pieces of ass) in front of teleprompters ... which act as if they have umbilical chords tied to RSS feeds from wire services.

Is this a market failure ... or is there simply not enough demand for quality information ... and therefore businesses are actually efficiently delivering the crap which customers demand?









</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JustAGuy is SPOT ON.  Reporting &#8220;the number&#8221; is just shoveling useless data &#8230; in effect parroting it.  Putting &#8220;the number&#8221;  in context helps provide actual information &#8230; which I thought was supposed to be the primary &#8220;product&#8221; cranked out by so called journalists. Right now is seems like there are simply mouth pieces (or glam pieces of ass) in front of teleprompters &#8230; which act as if they have umbilical chords tied to RSS feeds from wire services.</p>
<p>Is this a market failure &#8230; or is there simply not enough demand for quality information &#8230; and therefore businesses are actually efficiently delivering the crap which customers demand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/10/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/comment-page-1/#comment-47615</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:59:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2007/10/16/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/#comment-47615</guid>
		<description>Completely agree with your statement on this. There is nothing more worthless than these spending surveys. They really think the American shopper knows how much they will spend going into the holiday shopping season?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely agree with your statement on this. There is nothing more worthless than these spending surveys. They really think the American shopper knows how much they will spend going into the holiday shopping season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Czervik</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/10/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/comment-page-1/#comment-47614</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Czervik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2007/10/16/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/#comment-47614</guid>
		<description>Or maybe it means that, on average, they are still about $839 below the credit limit on their last credit card.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe it means that, on average, they are still about $839 below the credit limit on their last credit card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norman</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/10/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/comment-page-1/#comment-47613</link>
		<dc:creator>Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2007/10/16/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/#comment-47613</guid>
		<description>Maybe the year-to-year change in their expected X-mas spending plans would give a clue as to consumers&#039; state of mind.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the year-to-year change in their expected X-mas spending plans would give a clue as to consumers&#8217; state of mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jopo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/10/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/comment-page-1/#comment-47612</link>
		<dc:creator>jopo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2007/10/16/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/#comment-47612</guid>
		<description>the 17.6% clearly reflecting how much more it will cost getting to and from the mall....

$839 is the new $500
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the 17.6% clearly reflecting how much more it will cost getting to and from the mall&#8230;.</p>
<p>$839 is the new $500</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Czervik</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/10/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/comment-page-1/#comment-47611</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Czervik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2007/10/16/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/#comment-47611</guid>
		<description>I planned to buy a lotta things - when I still had a job.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I planned to buy a lotta things &#8211; when I still had a job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cm</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/10/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/comment-page-1/#comment-47610</link>
		<dc:creator>cm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2007/10/16/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/#comment-47610</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s a PR gimmick and the point is to provide a &quot;reference&quot; for what &lt;em&gt;you&lt;/em&gt; should spend?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s a PR gimmick and the point is to provide a &#8220;reference&#8221; for what <em>you</em> should spend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groty</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/10/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/comment-page-1/#comment-47609</link>
		<dc:creator>Groty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2007/10/16/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/#comment-47609</guid>
		<description>Apparently, NRF&#039;s 1.6 million retail establishment member&#039;s don&#039;t rely on the survey.  If they did, they would have been overstocked to the rafter in prior years, resulting in huge markdowns, promotions, margin compression, etc. in subsequent quarters to move the excess inventory.

So if NRF members aren&#039;t using the survey results to help them make inventory investment decisions, the purpose of the survey is to use it as just another marketing tool intended to influence consumer buying behavior?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, NRF&#8217;s 1.6 million retail establishment member&#8217;s don&#8217;t rely on the survey.  If they did, they would have been overstocked to the rafter in prior years, resulting in huge markdowns, promotions, margin compression, etc. in subsequent quarters to move the excess inventory.</p>
<p>So if NRF members aren&#8217;t using the survey results to help them make inventory investment decisions, the purpose of the survey is to use it as just another marketing tool intended to influence consumer buying behavior?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustAGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/10/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/comment-page-1/#comment-47608</link>
		<dc:creator>JustAGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 14:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2007/10/16/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/#comment-47608</guid>
		<description>Wouldn&#039;t it be pleasant if the nightly newscasts told us this too?  You know, like this:

&quot;Americans plan to spend an average $839 during the holiday season, up 17.6% from last year, the survey says.  It should be noted that this same survey forecast 22 % in 2005 but the actual results were 1%, and a forecast of 18.9 % in 2006 but the actual results were less than 5%.  So stay tuned.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it be pleasant if the nightly newscasts told us this too?  You know, like this:</p>
<p>&#8220;Americans plan to spend an average $839 during the holiday season, up 17.6% from last year, the survey says.  It should be noted that this same survey forecast 22 % in 2005 but the actual results were 1%, and a forecast of 18.9 % in 2006 but the actual results were less than 5%.  So stay tuned.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2007/10/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/comment-page-1/#comment-47607</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2007/10/16/repeat-after-me-spending-surveys-are-meaningless/#comment-47607</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m starting to believe that&#039;s why I love this game - the difference between psychology and reality.  Now if I can only get my timing down! lol
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting to believe that&#8217;s why I love this game &#8211; the difference between psychology and reality.  Now if I can only get my timing down! lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
