<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Santelli vs Cramer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/01/santelli-vs-cramer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/01/santelli-vs-cramer/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:38:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: np</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/01/santelli-vs-cramer/comment-page-2/#comment-75422</link>
		<dc:creator>np</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/01/25/santelli-vs-cramer/#comment-75422</guid>
		<description>PLEASE SPREAD THIS AROUND EVERYWHERE AND ANYWHERE -- CRAMER SIMPLY MUST BE STOPPED!
This is what Jim Cramer said at February 29, 2000:

You want my top 10 stocks for who is going to make it in the New World? You know what? I am going to give them to you. Right here. Right now. OK. Here goes. Write them down — no handouts here!: 724 Solutions, Ariba, Digital Island, Exodus, InfoSpace.com, Inktomi, Mercury Interactive, Sonera, VeriSign, and Veritas Software

You can’t make a worse portfolio even if you try. Looks like your loss should be in the 99% area.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PLEASE SPREAD THIS AROUND EVERYWHERE AND ANYWHERE &#8212; CRAMER SIMPLY MUST BE STOPPED!<br />
This is what Jim Cramer said at February 29, 2000:</p>
<p>You want my top 10 stocks for who is going to make it in the New World? You know what? I am going to give them to you. Right here. Right now. OK. Here goes. Write them down — no handouts here!: 724 Solutions, Ariba, Digital Island, Exodus, InfoSpace.com, Inktomi, Mercury Interactive, Sonera, VeriSign, and Veritas Software</p>
<p>You can’t make a worse portfolio even if you try. Looks like your loss should be in the 99% area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston Munn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/01/santelli-vs-cramer/comment-page-1/#comment-75421</link>
		<dc:creator>Winston Munn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 04:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/01/25/santelli-vs-cramer/#comment-75421</guid>
		<description>Cramer has NO CLUE!  He doesn&#039;t know how bad it is out there!  He doesn&#039;t pay the phone bill.  My people are losing their homes!  He has NO CLUE!  Open up the discount window and yell out, you&#039;re clueless, Schmuck!

HE HAS NO C-L-U-E!!!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cramer has NO CLUE!  He doesn&#8217;t know how bad it is out there!  He doesn&#8217;t pay the phone bill.  My people are losing their homes!  He has NO CLUE!  Open up the discount window and yell out, you&#8217;re clueless, Schmuck!</p>
<p>HE HAS NO C-L-U-E!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Sebille</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/01/santelli-vs-cramer/comment-page-1/#comment-75420</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Sebille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/01/25/santelli-vs-cramer/#comment-75420</guid>
		<description>Cramer is absolutely killing the little guy.  That bald SOB scammed his way to big money in the 90&#039;s as evident by the book &quot;Trading with the enemy&quot; in which a hire of his exposes all the bs he did.  Now Jimbo thinks he can repent all of his sins by giving sharing his &quot;market knowledge&quot;, and he is causing much more damage to the individual investor who sees jim as a &quot;guru&quot;.  I wish I had a link to his stocks for the 2000&#039;s he wrote shortly before the tech bubble burst in which 8 of the 10 companies went under.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cramer is absolutely killing the little guy.  That bald SOB scammed his way to big money in the 90&#8242;s as evident by the book &#8220;Trading with the enemy&#8221; in which a hire of his exposes all the bs he did.  Now Jimbo thinks he can repent all of his sins by giving sharing his &#8220;market knowledge&#8221;, and he is causing much more damage to the individual investor who sees jim as a &#8220;guru&#8221;.  I wish I had a link to his stocks for the 2000&#8242;s he wrote shortly before the tech bubble burst in which 8 of the 10 companies went under.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/01/santelli-vs-cramer/comment-page-1/#comment-75419</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/01/25/santelli-vs-cramer/#comment-75419</guid>
		<description>CNBC is largely white noise to me during the trading day, except when Rick Santelli comes on.  I have gotten so much useful information from Rick that has molded my markete views.  It&#039;s a shame he doesn&#039;t have more airtime to amplify his views; maybe Fast Money could give him some regular appearances on that show.

A few people mentioned Ron Insana, and I think that guy is pure genius.  They bring him on for a few minutes after the close and the guy is so honest in his views. Insana is one of those guys who knows markets inside out, best of the best.

Cramer...just ridiculous.  And, I&#039;m sorry but Erin Burnett seems to have never ending praise for Cramer.  She has no credibility with me because of it.

Didn&#039;t Cramer go all bullish on Thursday nite now declaring the bear market dead?  And didn&#039;t he rec Bear Stearns at 88, just two days after it was 68, alluding to the &#039;&#039;cache&#039;&#039; of the Bear Stearns name?...unbelievable....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CNBC is largely white noise to me during the trading day, except when Rick Santelli comes on.  I have gotten so much useful information from Rick that has molded my markete views.  It&#8217;s a shame he doesn&#8217;t have more airtime to amplify his views; maybe Fast Money could give him some regular appearances on that show.</p>
<p>A few people mentioned Ron Insana, and I think that guy is pure genius.  They bring him on for a few minutes after the close and the guy is so honest in his views. Insana is one of those guys who knows markets inside out, best of the best.</p>
<p>Cramer&#8230;just ridiculous.  And, I&#8217;m sorry but Erin Burnett seems to have never ending praise for Cramer.  She has no credibility with me because of it.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t Cramer go all bullish on Thursday nite now declaring the bear market dead?  And didn&#8217;t he rec Bear Stearns at 88, just two days after it was 68, alluding to the &#8221;cache&#8221; of the Bear Stearns name?&#8230;unbelievable&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickrude</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/01/santelli-vs-cramer/comment-page-1/#comment-75418</link>
		<dc:creator>rickrude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/01/25/santelli-vs-cramer/#comment-75418</guid>
		<description>Erim Burnett and other pretty air heads need to stay.
Atleast some pleasure looking at them instead of Kudlow and Cramer... who look like prunes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erim Burnett and other pretty air heads need to stay.<br />
Atleast some pleasure looking at them instead of Kudlow and Cramer&#8230; who look like prunes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bucky katt</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/01/santelli-vs-cramer/comment-page-1/#comment-75417</link>
		<dc:creator>bucky katt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/01/25/santelli-vs-cramer/#comment-75417</guid>
		<description>The bald idiot is an idiot, period.

Rick Santelli is the best thing on CNBC.

I agree with some of the other comments in that Cramer would be a perfect fit on the Fox network.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bald idiot is an idiot, period.</p>
<p>Rick Santelli is the best thing on CNBC.</p>
<p>I agree with some of the other comments in that Cramer would be a perfect fit on the Fox network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: la grande poussée</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/01/santelli-vs-cramer/comment-page-1/#comment-75416</link>
		<dc:creator>la grande poussée</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/01/25/santelli-vs-cramer/#comment-75416</guid>
		<description>It takes a lot of balls to go against CNBC rules about (their people)attacking and being negative. Rick Santelli was off on Friday.
Others have disappeared from CNBC mysteriously
(by CNBC gestapo&#039;s) Rick Santelli, not only speaks at a normal rate - but has an above normal intelligence!  Rick Santelli Rules!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It takes a lot of balls to go against CNBC rules about (their people)attacking and being negative. Rick Santelli was off on Friday.<br />
Others have disappeared from CNBC mysteriously<br />
(by CNBC gestapo&#8217;s) Rick Santelli, not only speaks at a normal rate &#8211; but has an above normal intelligence!  Rick Santelli Rules!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: festerpig</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/01/santelli-vs-cramer/comment-page-1/#comment-75415</link>
		<dc:creator>festerpig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/01/25/santelli-vs-cramer/#comment-75415</guid>
		<description>Yes. Rick Santelli is the only one on the CNBC US crew that is able to make sense of the market he covers and the linkages to other markets.  Erin Benett is sharp and make sense sometimes. The rest - all airheads, paid to look pretty and sprout &#039;apparently&#039; sensible comments.  I don&#039;t even want to get on to some of their guest presenters and/or &#039;experts&#039; - some of this folks come from Planet Mars.

I live in Asia I would even bother to rate CNBC Asia or CNBC Australia!  You are better off watch Circus de Solique if not for the need to watch CNBC for market prices and data.

Anyone who watches Cramer for his views and stock recommendation ought to seriously have their brains examined.  The guy is just paid (handsomely I am sure) to sprout words, often accompanied high drama theatrics to fill his daily allocated airtime slot.  He does not need to be held accountable for what he sprouts and neither does CNBC the network who will promptly display their disclaimer right everytime right after Cramer&#039;s speech.

I have seen a lot of blog readers refernce CNBC - does no one really watch Bloomberg TV?




</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Rick Santelli is the only one on the CNBC US crew that is able to make sense of the market he covers and the linkages to other markets.  Erin Benett is sharp and make sense sometimes. The rest &#8211; all airheads, paid to look pretty and sprout &#8216;apparently&#8217; sensible comments.  I don&#8217;t even want to get on to some of their guest presenters and/or &#8216;experts&#8217; &#8211; some of this folks come from Planet Mars.</p>
<p>I live in Asia I would even bother to rate CNBC Asia or CNBC Australia!  You are better off watch Circus de Solique if not for the need to watch CNBC for market prices and data.</p>
<p>Anyone who watches Cramer for his views and stock recommendation ought to seriously have their brains examined.  The guy is just paid (handsomely I am sure) to sprout words, often accompanied high drama theatrics to fill his daily allocated airtime slot.  He does not need to be held accountable for what he sprouts and neither does CNBC the network who will promptly display their disclaimer right everytime right after Cramer&#8217;s speech.</p>
<p>I have seen a lot of blog readers refernce CNBC &#8211; does no one really watch Bloomberg TV?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat Gorup</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/01/santelli-vs-cramer/comment-page-1/#comment-75414</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Gorup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/01/25/santelli-vs-cramer/#comment-75414</guid>
		<description>&quot;really think Kudlow is even worse than Cramer.&quot;

Yes, he has the ability to influencialy manipulate more important people (say in politics) to his way of thinking.  Way worse!


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;really think Kudlow is even worse than Cramer.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, he has the ability to influencialy manipulate more important people (say in politics) to his way of thinking.  Way worse!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickrude</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/01/santelli-vs-cramer/comment-page-1/#comment-75413</link>
		<dc:creator>rickrude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/01/25/santelli-vs-cramer/#comment-75413</guid>
		<description>really think Kudlow is even worse than Cramer.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really think Kudlow is even worse than Cramer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

