<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Aggregator: Real Clear Markets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/03/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/03/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/03/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-80046</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/03/25/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/#comment-80046</guid>
		<description>I like the site, but wish they had an RSS feed... what&#039;s up with that?

Maybe I should email the webmaster.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the site, but wish they had an RSS feed&#8230; what&#8217;s up with that?</p>
<p>Maybe I should email the webmaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darkness</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/03/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-80045</link>
		<dc:creator>darkness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/03/25/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/#comment-80045</guid>
		<description>&gt;So on any site they are running you are going to see a heavy weighting to the right, much more Kudlow than Krugman.

Funny, I was a regular at rcp before the 2006 election and I did not even realize they were on the right until after it was over, when there was a side comment somewhere of: &quot;oh, dang, we thought things would go the other way this season.&quot; Which impressed me by their even-handedness that I hadn&#039;t spotted a tilt, and as well, made me realize they were on Rove&#039;s fax list because he was about the only one selling that political swampland before nov.

I found rcp as a source for poll data to be clean, quick and unequaled.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>So on any site they are running you are going to see a heavy weighting to the right, much more Kudlow than Krugman.</p>
<p>Funny, I was a regular at rcp before the 2006 election and I did not even realize they were on the right until after it was over, when there was a side comment somewhere of: &#8220;oh, dang, we thought things would go the other way this season.&#8221; Which impressed me by their even-handedness that I hadn&#8217;t spotted a tilt, and as well, made me realize they were on Rove&#8217;s fax list because he was about the only one selling that political swampland before nov.</p>
<p>I found rcp as a source for poll data to be clean, quick and unequaled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kahunabear</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/03/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-80044</link>
		<dc:creator>kahunabear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/03/25/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/#comment-80044</guid>
		<description>For news with a skeptical slant, try this one instead:

http://www.favester.com


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For news with a skeptical slant, try this one instead:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.favester.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.favester.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Horowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/03/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-80043</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Horowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/03/25/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/#comment-80043</guid>
		<description>Barry:

Where is the GOD video section you referred to? I look and look and nowhere to be found.

Oh well, looked like it was going to be a god one too.

:-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry:</p>
<p>Where is the GOD video section you referred to? I look and look and nowhere to be found.</p>
<p>Oh well, looked like it was going to be a god one too.</p>
<p>:-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feedbite</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/03/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-80042</link>
		<dc:creator>feedbite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/03/25/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/#comment-80042</guid>
		<description>You may want to take a look at http://www.feedbite.com/html/?2181/20 aggregator, this is how I follow my economic news and how I find your articles.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to take a look at <a href="http://www.feedbite.com/html/?2181/20" rel="nofollow">http://www.feedbite.com/html/?2181/20</a> aggregator, this is how I follow my economic news and how I find your articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/03/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-80041</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/03/25/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/#comment-80041</guid>
		<description>Actually, RealClearMarkets originally was the predecessory to RealClearPolitics.  One or both of RCP&#039;s founders originally were money guys.  RCP was a side project that hit it huge in the 2004 election cycle.

The Markets site went defunct for a while when the Politics site was huge, and now it&#039;s back.  A welcome return.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, RealClearMarkets originally was the predecessory to RealClearPolitics.  One or both of RCP&#8217;s founders originally were money guys.  RCP was a side project that hit it huge in the 2004 election cycle.</p>
<p>The Markets site went defunct for a while when the Politics site was huge, and now it&#8217;s back.  A welcome return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronin</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/03/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-80040</link>
		<dc:creator>ronin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/03/25/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/#comment-80040</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;If they can manage to avoid the non-money running political hacks, the site will become even more useful as a source. (Suggested Goal: Avoid linking to people who make their readers &quot;poor and stupid&quot;)&lt;/i&gt;

Well said, Barry.

At least the WSJ keeps them isolated on the editorial page.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>If they can manage to avoid the non-money running political hacks, the site will become even more useful as a source. (Suggested Goal: Avoid linking to people who make their readers &#8220;poor and stupid&#8221;)</i></p>
<p>Well said, Barry.</p>
<p>At least the WSJ keeps them isolated on the editorial page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonghiteric</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/03/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-80039</link>
		<dc:creator>bonghiteric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/03/25/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/#comment-80039</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to see youtube videos with the CNBC commentators from Monday AM last week contrasted with their contradicting jibber-jabber from yesterday and today. JDimon&#039;s a hero, he&#039;s a failure, he&#039;s a hero, he&#039;s failure... slap.

Do those bedwetting mouthbreathers even care if they contradict themselves?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see youtube videos with the CNBC commentators from Monday AM last week contrasted with their contradicting jibber-jabber from yesterday and today. JDimon&#8217;s a hero, he&#8217;s a failure, he&#8217;s a hero, he&#8217;s failure&#8230; slap.</p>
<p>Do those bedwetting mouthbreathers even care if they contradict themselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nihilism</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/03/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-80038</link>
		<dc:creator>Nihilism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/03/25/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/#comment-80038</guid>
		<description>I agree - red headline/links? too congested look.

It would be nice if someone can come up with an idea/layout of tracking CEOs/flip-floppers/Spin-masters/pump-masters - see what they said a month ago and see how they are changing tunes now. That way they will start learning from their mistakes or at least stop spinning more.

On a diffrent note: Wells Fargo says: We love socialist fed!
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/wells-fargo-says-its-open/story.aspx?guid=%7BC56A2C85%2D301A%2D4903%2DA03C%2DD838DD80B548%7D&amp;dist=TQP_Mod_mktwN

The chief executive of Wells Fargo &amp; Co. said Tuesday that the current environment presents opportunities and that the venerable San Francisco bank would consider doing a deal in conjunction with the Federal Reserve.
&quot;I would not be averse to a Fed-assisted transaction,&quot; Chief Executive John Stumpf said in an interview with the San Francisco Business Times newspaper
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; red headline/links? too congested look.</p>
<p>It would be nice if someone can come up with an idea/layout of tracking CEOs/flip-floppers/Spin-masters/pump-masters &#8211; see what they said a month ago and see how they are changing tunes now. That way they will start learning from their mistakes or at least stop spinning more.</p>
<p>On a diffrent note: Wells Fargo says: We love socialist fed!<br />
<a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/wells-fargo-says-its-open/story.aspx?guid=%7BC56A2C85%2D301A%2D4903%2DA03C%2DD838DD80B548%7D&#038;dist=TQP_Mod_mktwN" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/wells-fargo-says-its-open/story.aspx?guid=%7BC56A2C85%2D301A%2D4903%2DA03C%2DD838DD80B548%7D&#038;dist=TQP_Mod_mktwN</a></p>
<p>The chief executive of Wells Fargo &#038; Co. said Tuesday that the current environment presents opportunities and that the venerable San Francisco bank would consider doing a deal in conjunction with the Federal Reserve.<br />
&#8220;I would not be averse to a Fed-assisted transaction,&#8221; Chief Executive John Stumpf said in an interview with the San Francisco Business Times newspaper</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael schumacher</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/03/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/comment-page-1/#comment-80037</link>
		<dc:creator>michael schumacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 20:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/03/25/new-aggregator-real-clear-markets/#comment-80037</guid>
		<description>at some point the volumes will matter....it&#039;s been as Dee has described it for over a year..

Volume sucks on &quot;rally&#039;s&quot;
Volume picks up on and is greatest on &quot;non-happy bomb&quot; days

Eventually that will win out however I NEVER thought it could be above 12k with the above description of where we are &quot;at&quot; fundamentally.

My biggest fear is that we have a repeat of last summer where the volumes are historically low and we got to watch the market get a boner over every hedge fund&#039;s overpayment for assets.  How many times I woke up on monday morning this summer only to see a headline like &quot;Douchebag Capital pays a gazillion for ___________&quot;  and then promptly push the moonshot button for over 200 points.....nevermind that over half of those &quot;deals&quot; made in the summer are not even getting done let alone at those atmospheric prices.

I see that GS only see&#039;s a total of $460b of write offs.........low balling it again so they can call the bottom in about three weeks time.  On BTW did they not say they were through with write offs???

Yet another unpunished lie....

Ciao
MS
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at some point the volumes will matter&#8230;.it&#8217;s been as Dee has described it for over a year..</p>
<p>Volume sucks on &#8220;rally&#8217;s&#8221;<br />
Volume picks up on and is greatest on &#8220;non-happy bomb&#8221; days</p>
<p>Eventually that will win out however I NEVER thought it could be above 12k with the above description of where we are &#8220;at&#8221; fundamentally.</p>
<p>My biggest fear is that we have a repeat of last summer where the volumes are historically low and we got to watch the market get a boner over every hedge fund&#8217;s overpayment for assets.  How many times I woke up on monday morning this summer only to see a headline like &#8220;Douchebag Capital pays a gazillion for ___________&#8221;  and then promptly push the moonshot button for over 200 points&#8230;..nevermind that over half of those &#8220;deals&#8221; made in the summer are not even getting done let alone at those atmospheric prices.</p>
<p>I see that GS only see&#8217;s a total of $460b of write offs&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;low balling it again so they can call the bottom in about three weeks time.  On BTW did they not say they were through with write offs???</p>
<p>Yet another unpunished lie&#8230;.</p>
<p>Ciao<br />
MS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

