<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Case Shiller Index Falls 15.3%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:59:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: We Buy Apartment Complexes</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/comment-page-1/#comment-94026</link>
		<dc:creator>We Buy Apartment Complexes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/#comment-94026</guid>
		<description>We are currently looking for operating complexes of 400 - 800 units.

http://www.WBCRE.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are currently looking for operating complexes of 400 &#8211; 800 units.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.WBCRE.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.WBCRE.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jz</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/comment-page-1/#comment-91786</link>
		<dc:creator>jz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 04:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/#comment-91786</guid>
		<description>Barry, I think this is a case where your headline is not matching reality. If you look at the second table and just look at the you have five up markets, five down markets, and Atlanta is a push. However, I checked out median prices in Atlanta on trulia.com, and the median home price is up.

And when you look at Phoenix and Vegas, two other bubble markets, the median price is down to $225,000 and $190,000 respectively. That is a price that two adults working full time can afford. The median price last year in Vegas was $300,000. Sure, there are parts of the country in California and Florida that have a lot further to fall IMO.

However, I think your headline does not reflect the fact that probably half of the country has hit a bottom in real estate, and much of the other half doesn&#039;t have much further to fall.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry, I think this is a case where your headline is not matching reality. If you look at the second table and just look at the you have five up markets, five down markets, and Atlanta is a push. However, I checked out median prices in Atlanta on trulia.com, and the median home price is up.</p>
<p>And when you look at Phoenix and Vegas, two other bubble markets, the median price is down to $225,000 and $190,000 respectively. That is a price that two adults working full time can afford. The median price last year in Vegas was $300,000. Sure, there are parts of the country in California and Florida that have a lot further to fall IMO.</p>
<p>However, I think your headline does not reflect the fact that probably half of the country has hit a bottom in real estate, and much of the other half doesn&#8217;t have much further to fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sean</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/comment-page-1/#comment-91785</link>
		<dc:creator>sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/#comment-91785</guid>
		<description>Is there an ETF or other shortable investment vehicle based on this?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there an ETF or other shortable investment vehicle based on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michange</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/comment-page-1/#comment-91784</link>
		<dc:creator>michange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/#comment-91784</guid>
		<description>Portfolio.com&#039;s latest contrary indicator :

&quot;Jun 24 2008   6:00PM EDT
After the Bust At ground zero of the housing slump, no turnaround is in sight.&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Portfolio.com&#8217;s latest contrary indicator :</p>
<p>&#8220;Jun 24 2008   6:00PM EDT<br />
After the Bust At ground zero of the housing slump, no turnaround is in sight.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HCF</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/comment-page-1/#comment-91783</link>
		<dc:creator>HCF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 21:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/#comment-91783</guid>
		<description>Anyone been watching CNBC today?

It&#039;s pathetic how much cheerleading is going on today.  Every other segment is &quot;Could this be the bottom?&quot;  I guess it is, well, until the next bottom gets made.

So much for &quot;fast, actionable, UNBIASED.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone been watching CNBC today?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pathetic how much cheerleading is going on today.  Every other segment is &#8220;Could this be the bottom?&#8221;  I guess it is, well, until the next bottom gets made.</p>
<p>So much for &#8220;fast, actionable, UNBIASED.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Schmitt</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/comment-page-1/#comment-91782</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Schmitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 18:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/#comment-91782</guid>
		<description>I think there are some errors in the column headings of the graphic.

Would be interesting to see how MLS listing prices track Case/Schiller. My limited research indicates list prices are in Fantasyland (also a place in CA and FL)

Example: I started looking at property in CA just to get an idea of where things stood. The listing prices haven&#039;t changed much in the last 2 years. Records indicate transactions (volume) are way down.

If you talk to a Realtor it is pretty clear the list price is complete BS. Which leads me to believe we still have a ways to go for the market to clear.

Just can&#039;t wait to see the carnage this causes in the CA cities property tax revenue. Muahahahahaha!

Waiting for that cheap buy in Santa Barbara County....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are some errors in the column headings of the graphic.</p>
<p>Would be interesting to see how MLS listing prices track Case/Schiller. My limited research indicates list prices are in Fantasyland (also a place in CA and FL)</p>
<p>Example: I started looking at property in CA just to get an idea of where things stood. The listing prices haven&#8217;t changed much in the last 2 years. Records indicate transactions (volume) are way down.</p>
<p>If you talk to a Realtor it is pretty clear the list price is complete BS. Which leads me to believe we still have a ways to go for the market to clear.</p>
<p>Just can&#8217;t wait to see the carnage this causes in the CA cities property tax revenue. Muahahahahaha!</p>
<p>Waiting for that cheap buy in Santa Barbara County&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/comment-page-1/#comment-91781</link>
		<dc:creator>BG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/#comment-91781</guid>
		<description>Don,

It could be that the data has not yet caught up with reality here.

I heard on the local news last night that Mecklenburg County is going into select depressed areas of the City and BUYING houses!  I kid you not.  They have spent $485K so far.  Unbelievable!  (I hope I dreamed that; but, I don&#039;t think I did.)

Mecklenburg County already has a shortfall in the School budget for next year; but, still feel they need to buy properties in depressed neighborhoods within the City?  Makes no sense.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don,</p>
<p>It could be that the data has not yet caught up with reality here.</p>
<p>I heard on the local news last night that Mecklenburg County is going into select depressed areas of the City and BUYING houses!  I kid you not.  They have spent $485K so far.  Unbelievable!  (I hope I dreamed that; but, I don&#8217;t think I did.)</p>
<p>Mecklenburg County already has a shortfall in the School budget for next year; but, still feel they need to buy properties in depressed neighborhoods within the City?  Makes no sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redfish Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/comment-page-1/#comment-91780</link>
		<dc:creator>Redfish Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/#comment-91780</guid>
		<description>Don is right on the mark - the year-over-year numbers have the chicken littles running for cover, though understanding the basic facts of real estate market cycles have others looking for great values.  Markets with reasonable fundamentals (there are a few) don&#039;t make headlines.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don is right on the mark &#8211; the year-over-year numbers have the chicken littles running for cover, though understanding the basic facts of real estate market cycles have others looking for great values.  Markets with reasonable fundamentals (there are a few) don&#8217;t make headlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Izzo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/comment-page-1/#comment-91779</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Izzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/#comment-91779</guid>
		<description>From the peak in July 2006 through April 2008, the 20-city Case-Shiller home price index is down almost 18%. If we project to the end of June, the cumulative drop is likely close to 20%. Many analysts have generated a lot of sensational headlines and scared a lot of people by talking about a 30% peak-to-trough fall in home prices. Assuming that they are referring to the Case-Shiller data, we may already be two-thirds of the way there… In contrast to Case-Shiller, the OFHEO index peaked later (April 2007), has been less volatile (both in the run-up and the fall), and has shown a less pronounced month-to-month pattern… Most economists and analysts seem to have embraced the Case-Shiller index as their sole indicator of national home prices… In our view, the best way to measure national home prices is probably to average the two gauges. By that yardstick, home prices are down by over 11% through April on the way, in our view, to something like a 20% fall.
–Stephen Stanley, RBS Greenwich Capital

The Case-Shiller indices are dropping much more than other house price measures. The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (Ofheo) monthly house price purchase index, for example, was down 4.6% (year-to-year) in April, while the National Association of Realtor’s median price was down 8.5%. Unfortunately, all methods devised to measure house prices have shortcomings, and it is impossible to state with any precision how much house prices are actually falling nationally or locally. During 1990-2000, the Case-Shiller 10-City Composite Index was flat, after adjusting for inflation. During 2000-06, its real value rose 78%. The index has dropped about 24% in real terms since peaking. But given the current level of unsold homes on the market, the number of foreclosures already in or about to enter the pipeline, and the run-up in prices over 2000-06, this index is likely to drop much more.
–Patrick Newport, Global Insight

The month-over-month declines in the Case-Shiller index have moderated a bit in the last couple months. Some of the moderation appears to be a real shift — though only over two months — and some of it is strictly seasonal. The month-over-month change in the 20-city composite bottomed at -2.6% in February before edging up to -2.2% in March and -1.4% in April. After running the index through a standard seasonal adjustment program, the index shows changes of -2.5% in February, -2.1% in March, and -1.8% in April… The broader coverage of subprime and Alt-A loans in the Case-Shiller index is probably one reason that the index is falling faster. This is because these types of mortgages are experiencing high rates of foreclosure, and there is some anecdotal and statistical evidence that foreclosed homes are being sold at significant discounts.
–Abiel Reinhart, J.P. Morgan

The weakness has not been contained to the bubble markets [in the S&amp;P/Case-Shiller index]. Home prices are now falling in all 20 cities surveyed, with Charlotte being the last city to fall. On a monthly basis, prices surprisingly rose in 8 cities. However, we attribute most of unexpected increase to seasonal distortions as prices are typically higher during the spring selling season
–Michelle Meyer, Lehman Brothers

Cleveland, where prices have collapsed and given up almost all their gains this decade, led the way with a out-size 2.94% month-to-month gain [in the S&amp;P/Case-Shiller index]. Increasingly affordable as prices in Cleveland are doubtless becoming, this jump is probably erratic and should be treated with suspicion. But modest price gains in cities such as Dallas, Charlotte/Portland are more readily believable given their favorable demographics and the increasing attraction of buying vs. renting as prices have slipped in these areas. Dallas, where prices also posted a healthy m/m gain in March, are likely benefiting from record oil prices.
–Richard Iley, BNP Paribas

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the peak in July 2006 through April 2008, the 20-city Case-Shiller home price index is down almost 18%. If we project to the end of June, the cumulative drop is likely close to 20%. Many analysts have generated a lot of sensational headlines and scared a lot of people by talking about a 30% peak-to-trough fall in home prices. Assuming that they are referring to the Case-Shiller data, we may already be two-thirds of the way there… In contrast to Case-Shiller, the OFHEO index peaked later (April 2007), has been less volatile (both in the run-up and the fall), and has shown a less pronounced month-to-month pattern… Most economists and analysts seem to have embraced the Case-Shiller index as their sole indicator of national home prices… In our view, the best way to measure national home prices is probably to average the two gauges. By that yardstick, home prices are down by over 11% through April on the way, in our view, to something like a 20% fall.<br />
–Stephen Stanley, RBS Greenwich Capital</p>
<p>The Case-Shiller indices are dropping much more than other house price measures. The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (Ofheo) monthly house price purchase index, for example, was down 4.6% (year-to-year) in April, while the National Association of Realtor’s median price was down 8.5%. Unfortunately, all methods devised to measure house prices have shortcomings, and it is impossible to state with any precision how much house prices are actually falling nationally or locally. During 1990-2000, the Case-Shiller 10-City Composite Index was flat, after adjusting for inflation. During 2000-06, its real value rose 78%. The index has dropped about 24% in real terms since peaking. But given the current level of unsold homes on the market, the number of foreclosures already in or about to enter the pipeline, and the run-up in prices over 2000-06, this index is likely to drop much more.<br />
–Patrick Newport, Global Insight</p>
<p>The month-over-month declines in the Case-Shiller index have moderated a bit in the last couple months. Some of the moderation appears to be a real shift — though only over two months — and some of it is strictly seasonal. The month-over-month change in the 20-city composite bottomed at -2.6% in February before edging up to -2.2% in March and -1.4% in April. After running the index through a standard seasonal adjustment program, the index shows changes of -2.5% in February, -2.1% in March, and -1.8% in April… The broader coverage of subprime and Alt-A loans in the Case-Shiller index is probably one reason that the index is falling faster. This is because these types of mortgages are experiencing high rates of foreclosure, and there is some anecdotal and statistical evidence that foreclosed homes are being sold at significant discounts.<br />
–Abiel Reinhart, J.P. Morgan</p>
<p>The weakness has not been contained to the bubble markets [in the S&#038;P/Case-Shiller index]. Home prices are now falling in all 20 cities surveyed, with Charlotte being the last city to fall. On a monthly basis, prices surprisingly rose in 8 cities. However, we attribute most of unexpected increase to seasonal distortions as prices are typically higher during the spring selling season<br />
–Michelle Meyer, Lehman Brothers</p>
<p>Cleveland, where prices have collapsed and given up almost all their gains this decade, led the way with a out-size 2.94% month-to-month gain [in the S&#038;P/Case-Shiller index]. Increasingly affordable as prices in Cleveland are doubtless becoming, this jump is probably erratic and should be treated with suspicion. But modest price gains in cities such as Dallas, Charlotte/Portland are more readily believable given their favorable demographics and the increasing attraction of buying vs. renting as prices have slipped in these areas. Dallas, where prices also posted a healthy m/m gain in March, are likely benefiting from record oil prices.<br />
–Richard Iley, BNP Paribas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dark1p</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/comment-page-1/#comment-91778</link>
		<dc:creator>dark1p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/case-shiller-index-falls-153/#comment-91778</guid>
		<description>Bystander--

Maybe the Nasdaq, but I don&#039;t know about the Dow....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bystander&#8211;</p>
<p>Maybe the Nasdaq, but I don&#8217;t know about the Dow&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

