<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lehman posts Jumbo $3B Loss; To Raise $6B</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:53:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darin</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/comment-page-1/#comment-90079</link>
		<dc:creator>Darin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/#comment-90079</guid>
		<description>The problem is that banks have been reporting negative core assets since Feb of this year and the FED has finally decided that the crisis has abated.  We need Lehman to go under and at least one more to merge before we will know we have hit bottom.  I give it another 18 months.  $1 Trillion is a very modest estimate of losses.  Just look at derivatives...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that banks have been reporting negative core assets since Feb of this year and the FED has finally decided that the crisis has abated.  We need Lehman to go under and at least one more to merge before we will know we have hit bottom.  I give it another 18 months.  $1 Trillion is a very modest estimate of losses.  Just look at derivatives&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fredex</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/comment-page-1/#comment-90078</link>
		<dc:creator>Fredex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/#comment-90078</guid>
		<description>Shorter Lehman: &quot;I&#039;m not dead yet!&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shorter Lehman: &#8220;I&#8217;m not dead yet!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael schumacher</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/comment-page-1/#comment-90077</link>
		<dc:creator>michael schumacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/#comment-90077</guid>
		<description>sorry should have said scorpio....not that Steve&#039;s should be ignored though..

Ciao
MS
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry should have said scorpio&#8230;.not that Steve&#8217;s should be ignored though..</p>
<p>Ciao<br />
MS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael schumacher</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/comment-page-1/#comment-90076</link>
		<dc:creator>michael schumacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/#comment-90076</guid>
		<description>If the &quot;buyer&quot; is still unnamed then I have to  subscribe to Steve&#039;s posit above.

Anyone buying this sack &#039;o&#039; crap without as much as a single public disclosure has to be the biggest schmuck going.....

Since they&#039;ve washed out the June puts, that everyone and there brother has, this race to the bottom will continue after next week&#039;s option expiry....Love how the stock goes down 9% and even long dated puts tumble as much as 8%.....that&#039;s ok I have more time than LEH&#039;s balance sheet does...

Ciao
MS
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the &#8220;buyer&#8221; is still unnamed then I have to  subscribe to Steve&#8217;s posit above.</p>
<p>Anyone buying this sack &#8216;o&#8217; crap without as much as a single public disclosure has to be the biggest schmuck going&#8230;..</p>
<p>Since they&#8217;ve washed out the June puts, that everyone and there brother has, this race to the bottom will continue after next week&#8217;s option expiry&#8230;.Love how the stock goes down 9% and even long dated puts tumble as much as 8%&#8230;..that&#8217;s ok I have more time than LEH&#8217;s balance sheet does&#8230;</p>
<p>Ciao<br />
MS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scorpio</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/comment-page-1/#comment-90075</link>
		<dc:creator>scorpio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 14:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/#comment-90075</guid>
		<description>i know the thread has moved on but i cant let this go. how can anyone w even a modest regard for their capital invest $6 B in a company that wont take questions on a conf call? people. when you find out that your manager has bot these shares, pls sell your fund. unbelievable. i hope the names are publicized tomorrow
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i know the thread has moved on but i cant let this go. how can anyone w even a modest regard for their capital invest $6 B in a company that wont take questions on a conf call? people. when you find out that your manager has bot these shares, pls sell your fund. unbelievable. i hope the names are publicized tomorrow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/comment-page-1/#comment-90074</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/#comment-90074</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see,,,  Einhorn mentioned the 30b in raw land that LEH has,,,  &amp; the WSJ just reported LandSource is in chap 11, because land has fallen by 30%.... so that 30b is more like 21b...  LEH took 700m,,, that leaves another 8.3b writedown...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see,,,  Einhorn mentioned the 30b in raw land that LEH has,,,  &#038; the WSJ just reported LandSource is in chap 11, because land has fallen by 30%&#8230;. so that 30b is more like 21b&#8230;  LEH took 700m,,, that leaves another 8.3b writedown&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larster</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/comment-page-1/#comment-90073</link>
		<dc:creator>larster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/#comment-90073</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about time for Paulson to jump in and state that the crisis has been contained, further shredding his reputation.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time for Paulson to jump in and state that the crisis has been contained, further shredding his reputation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyS</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/comment-page-1/#comment-90072</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/#comment-90072</guid>
		<description>Man...it&#039;s going to be blood on the streets again today. The financial sector is a total basket case! Here comes the second Fed bailout by printing more money....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man&#8230;it&#8217;s going to be blood on the streets again today. The financial sector is a total basket case! Here comes the second Fed bailout by printing more money&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scorpio</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/comment-page-1/#comment-90071</link>
		<dc:creator>scorpio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/#comment-90071</guid>
		<description>sorry, just occurred to me who the oversubscribed buyer is in LEH&#039;s case. who else would inject fantastic sums into historically over-levered financial schemes without asking any basic information or even waiting for a conf call? the Fed, of course. good job Ben! you mullett
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, just occurred to me who the oversubscribed buyer is in LEH&#8217;s case. who else would inject fantastic sums into historically over-levered financial schemes without asking any basic information or even waiting for a conf call? the Fed, of course. good job Ben! you mullett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cinefoz</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/comment-page-1/#comment-90070</link>
		<dc:creator>cinefoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/06/lehman-posts-jumbo-3b-loss-to-raise-6b/#comment-90070</guid>
		<description>Based on what I read on Business Week&#039;s site today about how investment banks have been gaming the oil business because of regulatory changes in 2000 that permitted at least some of manipulation, I suspect that GS and others will have similar stories written about them in six months or so because of oil instead of real estate. It looks like Congress is going to make them eat their own shit. Even the Bush CFTC might take action ... it looks like they are at least proffering the appearance of action. BW explains the environment and touches on the techniques.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on what I read on Business Week&#8217;s site today about how investment banks have been gaming the oil business because of regulatory changes in 2000 that permitted at least some of manipulation, I suspect that GS and others will have similar stories written about them in six months or so because of oil instead of real estate. It looks like Congress is going to make them eat their own shit. Even the Bush CFTC might take action &#8230; it looks like they are at least proffering the appearance of action. BW explains the environment and touches on the techniques.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
