A long/short hedge fund manager of my acquaintance went to short some Morgan Stanley (MS) via a B/D that clears through Wachovia:
The Trader comes back: "Wait a second — that’s on the list — I cant short that."
The Fund Manager says: No, I don’t want to Naked Short it, we have already located a borrow — this is a clean, legitimate short sale.
Trader: Nope, we clear through Wachovia — and its on the list – NO SHORTING THESE 19 PRIMARY DEALER NAMES — PLUS FANNIE AND FREDDIE — AT ALL.
Fund Manager: That’s ridiculous — how can you not execute a legitimate borrowed short?
Trader: Wachovia. Dems da rulez. You have to go elsewhere.
Fund Manager: Consider it done.
Postscript: FM added to his Morgan short elsewhere, and initiated a new Merrill Lynch (MER) short. I don’t know what it says about Wachovia that they won’t even allow shorts in those names (deep doodoo??).
I am paraphrasing Jim Grant, but "Shorting is the financial world’s equivalent of free speech."
Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor implied. If you could repeat previously discredited memes or steer the conversation into irrelevant, off topic discussions, it would be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.