<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Barron&#8217;s Housing Cover Is So Terribly Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 23:17:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Angell</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-99652</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Angell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/#comment-99652</guid>
		<description>It would be great if we had an economic wizard who could declare that the housing market bottom was here, but I&#039;ve been through four decades of rises and falls.

The housing market is fickle and it has needed a correction for a long time. The cost of labor is over-priced. There are general contractors out there that are living on seven figure incomes and many of them have no college education at all.

The storm hasn&#039;t run its course quite yet.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be great if we had an economic wizard who could declare that the housing market bottom was here, but I&#8217;ve been through four decades of rises and falls.</p>
<p>The housing market is fickle and it has needed a correction for a long time. The cost of labor is over-priced. There are general contractors out there that are living on seven figure incomes and many of them have no college education at all.</p>
<p>The storm hasn&#8217;t run its course quite yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sing Expat</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-96681</link>
		<dc:creator>Sing Expat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 03:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/#comment-96681</guid>
		<description>Thanks again for pointing out the only valid arguments about house prices.  Yun, Bernanke, Bush, Barron&#039;s, et al have one argument only: house prices will go up because they have dropped really far and gosh it would be better if they went up.

Price-Income ratios, Price-rental Ratios, Inventory, Savings Rates, Mortgage Cost and Availability.  These are what matter.  Anything else is just bubble talk.

I was led to believe that median house prices are related to median individual income at a ratio of 2.5 to 3.  Median income is about $49k so median house price should be about $122k tops (optimistic level based on recession, inventory, lending).  Basically another 30-35% drop before we can even think about bottoming.

I would appreciate feedback on my income and house price numbers?  Am I using the correct income?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again for pointing out the only valid arguments about house prices.  Yun, Bernanke, Bush, Barron&#8217;s, et al have one argument only: house prices will go up because they have dropped really far and gosh it would be better if they went up.</p>
<p>Price-Income ratios, Price-rental Ratios, Inventory, Savings Rates, Mortgage Cost and Availability.  These are what matter.  Anything else is just bubble talk.</p>
<p>I was led to believe that median house prices are related to median individual income at a ratio of 2.5 to 3.  Median income is about $49k so median house price should be about $122k tops (optimistic level based on recession, inventory, lending).  Basically another 30-35% drop before we can even think about bottoming.</p>
<p>I would appreciate feedback on my income and house price numbers?  Am I using the correct income?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-96680</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 23:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/#comment-96680</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you&#039;re so smart, I presume you&#039;re also rich???&quot;

That attitude is ruining our country.

Judge a person&#039;s intelligence by the cogency of their arguments, not their net worth.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you&#8217;re so smart, I presume you&#8217;re also rich???&#8221;</p>
<p>That attitude is ruining our country.</p>
<p>Judge a person&#8217;s intelligence by the cogency of their arguments, not their net worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-96679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/#comment-96679</guid>
		<description>Well, it seems that all this optimism and calling the bottom has the intention of setting up one more big &quot;Bull Trap&quot; by the end of 2008.  Over the next few months, the news reports may even appear giddy and excited about finally reaching the bottom.  Then when the last sucker has dropped his money, we&#039;ll begin to see prices drop more than they already have as the economy begins to show us what the credit crisis caused, a tremendous contraction in wealth and commerce that will destroy many, many jobs.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it seems that all this optimism and calling the bottom has the intention of setting up one more big &#8220;Bull Trap&#8221; by the end of 2008.  Over the next few months, the news reports may even appear giddy and excited about finally reaching the bottom.  Then when the last sucker has dropped his money, we&#8217;ll begin to see prices drop more than they already have as the economy begins to show us what the credit crisis caused, a tremendous contraction in wealth and commerce that will destroy many, many jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna's Bush</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-96240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna's Bush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 15:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/#comment-96240</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Lawrence Yun is optimistic&lt;/i&gt;

When is that stupid bitch not &quot;optimistic&quot;?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Lawrence Yun is optimistic</i></p>
<p>When is that stupid bitch not &#8220;optimistic&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LEWIS</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-96239</link>
		<dc:creator>LEWIS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/#comment-96239</guid>
		<description>First, Bruce in Tennessee - I moved in February to Vonore from a major metropolitan area.....hmmmm, how close to me are you?

Yeah, housing is going to bottom, I guarantee it, just don&#039;t think its gonna happen real soon.  And while we wait for that disaster to head into the past, future problems are pounding on our front door faster and faster.  And, with the next election providing us with the leadership we deserve....

Makes you understand why the superhero movie summer is in full swing, our last refuge for hope for the future....fiction (just for clarity, that&#039;s a reference to the movies, not the political campaigns)...

Lewis in East Tennessee
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, Bruce in Tennessee &#8211; I moved in February to Vonore from a major metropolitan area&#8230;..hmmmm, how close to me are you?</p>
<p>Yeah, housing is going to bottom, I guarantee it, just don&#8217;t think its gonna happen real soon.  And while we wait for that disaster to head into the past, future problems are pounding on our front door faster and faster.  And, with the next election providing us with the leadership we deserve&#8230;.</p>
<p>Makes you understand why the superhero movie summer is in full swing, our last refuge for hope for the future&#8230;.fiction (just for clarity, that&#8217;s a reference to the movies, not the political campaigns)&#8230;</p>
<p>Lewis in East Tennessee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-96238</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/#comment-96238</guid>
		<description>Why the blame on Bush and Republicans? Oh, that&#039;s right.

You think the government should take care of you from cradle to grave - free food stamps - free health care - free tuition - free mortgage bailout - free oil - no wait - that ain&#039;t happening.

The number one economy-killer - high oil prices. The cure? The Democrat-controlled Congress now run by a bunch of former 60s drug using addled-brain hippies are more concerned about the environment than you, your family, your home, your job and the US economy by preventing increased drilling for domestic oil and the construction of sorely-needed oil refineries.

How about free gasoline vouchers? How about half the population of the US die off to lower the demand for oil all &quot;for the children&quot; and to &quot;save the environment&quot;?

This would be the result as we all wait for a slow painful death before &quot;alternate&quot; forms of energy replace Al Gore&#039;s hated internal-combustion engine. Save the Polar Bear!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the blame on Bush and Republicans? Oh, that&#8217;s right.</p>
<p>You think the government should take care of you from cradle to grave &#8211; free food stamps &#8211; free health care &#8211; free tuition &#8211; free mortgage bailout &#8211; free oil &#8211; no wait &#8211; that ain&#8217;t happening.</p>
<p>The number one economy-killer &#8211; high oil prices. The cure? The Democrat-controlled Congress now run by a bunch of former 60s drug using addled-brain hippies are more concerned about the environment than you, your family, your home, your job and the US economy by preventing increased drilling for domestic oil and the construction of sorely-needed oil refineries.</p>
<p>How about free gasoline vouchers? How about half the population of the US die off to lower the demand for oil all &#8220;for the children&#8221; and to &#8220;save the environment&#8221;?</p>
<p>This would be the result as we all wait for a slow painful death before &#8220;alternate&#8221; forms of energy replace Al Gore&#8217;s hated internal-combustion engine. Save the Polar Bear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-96237</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 10:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/#comment-96237</guid>
		<description>1.  Portland Cement Assocation sees it as bleak: tepid sales recovery late 2008,  no recovery in starts (which drive portions of the economy) until 2010.

I think they are optimistic, although not if by &quot;sales recovery&quot; they mean rate of sales only with no counting of price of comparable. Prices will keep declining. Even Mr. Yun will notice sometime in 2009 (Q2? Q3?) that prices did not recover an iota in 2008.

2. Without doubt, Case-Shiller understates the situation.

- Only includes sales that went through, does not reflect unsold comparable inventory that in a declining market will sell for even less.

- Condos are excluded.  The national vacancy rate for condos is 5x that of single-family homes (3% vs. 15%) and thus the market is more depressed.  My guess is that there was proportionately  more speculation in condos than in single family structures.

- REO&#039;s and outliers are excluded.

- Downweighting of more aged sales pairs implies a slight bias toward newer construction and thus deemphasizes properties where the earlier sale was at the absolute peak

- Exclusion of developer sales misses the huge decline in new home prices. (The average developer is smarter than the average home seller and wants to get out quickly rather than hold on to a declining asset.

- Increasingly, the lack (I am not 100% certain of this one) of inflation adjustment further understates the true decline.

It may be about the best metric we have, but it is undoubtedly skewed so as to understate the actual drop in values that is occurring in most areas.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.  Portland Cement Assocation sees it as bleak: tepid sales recovery late 2008,  no recovery in starts (which drive portions of the economy) until 2010.</p>
<p>I think they are optimistic, although not if by &#8220;sales recovery&#8221; they mean rate of sales only with no counting of price of comparable. Prices will keep declining. Even Mr. Yun will notice sometime in 2009 (Q2? Q3?) that prices did not recover an iota in 2008.</p>
<p>2. Without doubt, Case-Shiller understates the situation.</p>
<p>- Only includes sales that went through, does not reflect unsold comparable inventory that in a declining market will sell for even less.</p>
<p>- Condos are excluded.  The national vacancy rate for condos is 5x that of single-family homes (3% vs. 15%) and thus the market is more depressed.  My guess is that there was proportionately  more speculation in condos than in single family structures.</p>
<p>- REO&#8217;s and outliers are excluded.</p>
<p>- Downweighting of more aged sales pairs implies a slight bias toward newer construction and thus deemphasizes properties where the earlier sale was at the absolute peak</p>
<p>- Exclusion of developer sales misses the huge decline in new home prices. (The average developer is smarter than the average home seller and wants to get out quickly rather than hold on to a declining asset.</p>
<p>- Increasingly, the lack (I am not 100% certain of this one) of inflation adjustment further understates the true decline.</p>
<p>It may be about the best metric we have, but it is undoubtedly skewed so as to understate the actual drop in values that is occurring in most areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innocent Bystander</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-96236</link>
		<dc:creator>Innocent Bystander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/#comment-96236</guid>
		<description>Ditto Barons, I accidentally re-upped about three months ago but that will be the last time.  It has changed along with WSJ. They both have become soft, and the housing article was just the frosting on the cake.  The blogs are have replaced them, although there is a lot more material to go through. I usually throw out the Journal in the same wrapper it came in.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto Barons, I accidentally re-upped about three months ago but that will be the last time.  It has changed along with WSJ. They both have become soft, and the housing article was just the frosting on the cake.  The blogs are have replaced them, although there is a lot more material to go through. I usually throw out the Journal in the same wrapper it came in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kj</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-96235</link>
		<dc:creator>kj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 02:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/07/why-barrons-housing-cover-is-so-terribly-wrong/#comment-96235</guid>
		<description>Where do you people come up with all this stuff?  If you&#039;re so smart, I presume you&#039;re also rich???  The reality, and the facts, are most likely somewhere in the middle between the likes of Barrons/the WSJ and your exalted blogsters.  By the way, at least the MSM can spell.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do you people come up with all this stuff?  If you&#8217;re so smart, I presume you&#8217;re also rich???  The reality, and the facts, are most likely somewhere in the middle between the likes of Barrons/the WSJ and your exalted blogsters.  By the way, at least the MSM can spell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

