<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Civilian Unemployment &amp; Recessions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:08:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/comment-page-1/#comment-103123</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 02:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/#comment-103123</guid>
		<description>Britain Faces Worst Economic Crisis in 60 Years...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7589291.stm

By none other than Alistar Darling...

I can still wait awhile before I send Mr. Washington and Mr. Lincoln back to work for me in this market...

Bruce in Tennessee
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britain Faces Worst Economic Crisis in 60 Years&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7589291.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7589291.stm</a></p>
<p>By none other than Alistar Darling&#8230;</p>
<p>I can still wait awhile before I send Mr. Washington and Mr. Lincoln back to work for me in this market&#8230;</p>
<p>Bruce in Tennessee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icm63</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/comment-page-1/#comment-103122</link>
		<dc:creator>icm63</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/#comment-103122</guid>
		<description>WARNING. FDIC survey of Lending standards tightening, and inflation have a high correlation with how bad unemployment can get. At the moment both tight lending standards and inflation are higher than 1991/2001 so unemployment rate peaking at above 7.5% is a very big possibility. Its not un american to be a boy scout and be prepared, (I am not american), so good luck.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WARNING. FDIC survey of Lending standards tightening, and inflation have a high correlation with how bad unemployment can get. At the moment both tight lending standards and inflation are higher than 1991/2001 so unemployment rate peaking at above 7.5% is a very big possibility. Its not un american to be a boy scout and be prepared, (I am not american), so good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimmyY</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/comment-page-1/#comment-103121</link>
		<dc:creator>JimmyY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/#comment-103121</guid>
		<description>Hi Barry.


Have you noticed....


Per U.S. DoL&#039;s 8/21 initial claims release:

&quot;States reported 1,284,252 persons claiming EUC (Emergency Unemployment Compensation) benefits for the week ending Aug. 2, an increase of 570,284 from the prior week.&quot;


I looked at initial claims news releases prior to 8/21 and could NOT find any reference to the &quot;570k prior week&quot; statistic.


The 8/28 initial claims are not better:

&quot;States reported 980,695 persons claiming EUC (Emergency Unemployment Compensation) benefits for the week ending Aug. 9, a decrease of 313,633 from the prior week.&quot;


Unfortunately, the 8/21 EUC numbers were revised +10k within the 8/28 report.


More analysis from Mike Donnelly:

http://pbp.typepad.com/economy/2008/08/15-million-more-at-the-unemployment-office.html


Looks like the employment picture (or lack thereof) seems very ominous.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Barry.</p>
<p>Have you noticed&#8230;.</p>
<p>Per U.S. DoL&#8217;s 8/21 initial claims release:</p>
<p>&#8220;States reported 1,284,252 persons claiming EUC (Emergency Unemployment Compensation) benefits for the week ending Aug. 2, an increase of 570,284 from the prior week.&#8221;</p>
<p>I looked at initial claims news releases prior to 8/21 and could NOT find any reference to the &#8220;570k prior week&#8221; statistic.</p>
<p>The 8/28 initial claims are not better:</p>
<p>&#8220;States reported 980,695 persons claiming EUC (Emergency Unemployment Compensation) benefits for the week ending Aug. 9, a decrease of 313,633 from the prior week.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the 8/21 EUC numbers were revised +10k within the 8/28 report.</p>
<p>More analysis from Mike Donnelly:</p>
<p><a href="http://pbp.typepad.com/economy/2008/08/15-million-more-at-the-unemployment-office.html" rel="nofollow">http://pbp.typepad.com/economy/2008/08/15-million-more-at-the-unemployment-office.html</a></p>
<p>Looks like the employment picture (or lack thereof) seems very ominous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve C</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/comment-page-1/#comment-103120</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/#comment-103120</guid>
		<description>Very nice work Barry.  When does it become profitable to start buying stocks when a recession is looming?  Since the stock market is, theoretically, always six months ahead, should we start buying stocks now in preparation for the recovery?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice work Barry.  When does it become profitable to start buying stocks when a recession is looming?  Since the stock market is, theoretically, always six months ahead, should we start buying stocks now in preparation for the recovery?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philipat</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/comment-page-1/#comment-103119</link>
		<dc:creator>philipat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/#comment-103119</guid>
		<description>Excuse me if I am wrong but doesn&#039;t the third graph suggest that when the rate of change goes over 15 this is coincident with the END of a recession?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excuse me if I am wrong but doesn&#8217;t the third graph suggest that when the rate of change goes over 15 this is coincident with the END of a recession?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mickslam</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/comment-page-1/#comment-103118</link>
		<dc:creator>mickslam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/#comment-103118</guid>
		<description>Alright Barry - We get it!!!!

You think we are in a recession!!  jeeze...

But you do have to say it over and over, as there is a substantial crowd out there that thinks we are growing at like 3.2% or something crazy.

I would like this chart better if they used U-9 but thats a quibble not a criticism.

The more important question now &quot;is when does it end?&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright Barry &#8211; We get it!!!!</p>
<p>You think we are in a recession!!  jeeze&#8230;</p>
<p>But you do have to say it over and over, as there is a substantial crowd out there that thinks we are growing at like 3.2% or something crazy.</p>
<p>I would like this chart better if they used U-9 but thats a quibble not a criticism.</p>
<p>The more important question now &#8220;is when does it end?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/comment-page-1/#comment-103117</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebigpicture.dev.wilder.ca/blog/2008/08/civilian-unemployment-recessions/#comment-103117</guid>
		<description>That income number was a shocker this morning, eh Barry? That was actually worse than the more bearish predictions.

We are probably seeing a confluence of rising unemployment and a decrease in hours worked among those employed, something not as obvious but that you can see going on around us.

Fannie and Freddie common not looking like the bargain of the century today, I see....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That income number was a shocker this morning, eh Barry? That was actually worse than the more bearish predictions.</p>
<p>We are probably seeing a confluence of rising unemployment and a decrease in hours worked among those employed, something not as obvious but that you can see going on around us.</p>
<p>Fannie and Freddie common not looking like the bargain of the century today, I see&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

