<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Buy In</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:05:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 401ktrader</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/comment-page-2/#comment-120312</link>
		<dc:creator>401ktrader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/#comment-120312</guid>
		<description>speakin of CNBC, is it me or has Bloomberg TV upped the ante on CNBC BIGTIME with some of the Finest Honeys on the financial news circle...Erin &amp; Maria who ???,...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speakin of CNBC, is it me or has Bloomberg TV upped the ante on CNBC BIGTIME with some of the Finest Honeys on the financial news circle&#8230;Erin &#038; Maria who ???,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toddZ</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/comment-page-2/#comment-120311</link>
		<dc:creator>toddZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 04:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/#comment-120311</guid>
		<description>maybe a bounce... maybe not. a lower closing low is ominous though. I say why trade against what&#039;s working??

I&#039;ve been short housing for 2 years now, and I never had the thought &quot;hey I should jump in here for a long trade!&quot; On any big rally I just added more to my short position. I&#039;m looking to close it out pretty soon, but it&#039;s been a long, long ride that made a ton of money.



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe a bounce&#8230; maybe not. a lower closing low is ominous though. I say why trade against what&#8217;s working??</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been short housing for 2 years now, and I never had the thought &#8220;hey I should jump in here for a long trade!&#8221; On any big rally I just added more to my short position. I&#8217;m looking to close it out pretty soon, but it&#8217;s been a long, long ride that made a ton of money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/comment-page-2/#comment-120310</link>
		<dc:creator>jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/#comment-120310</guid>
		<description>lot of gamblers out there taking longs when there is no clear and definitive buy signal. i would cut loose should the Oct. 10 SPX/INDU lows breakdown though. The NDX has already done so which is usually a leading index. Good luck catching falling knives is all I can say ;)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lot of gamblers out there taking longs when there is no clear and definitive buy signal. i would cut loose should the Oct. 10 SPX/INDU lows breakdown though. The NDX has already done so which is usually a leading index. Good luck catching falling knives is all I can say ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveinHackensack</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/comment-page-2/#comment-120309</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveinHackensack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/#comment-120309</guid>
		<description>Barry,

What have you been buying?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry,</p>
<p>What have you been buying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/comment-page-2/#comment-120308</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 02:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/#comment-120308</guid>
		<description>Good luck with your thesis... seriously. I just happen to think that a rally requires money and currently we are sold out. :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck with your thesis&#8230; seriously. I just happen to think that a rally requires money and currently we are sold out. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in NOLa</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/comment-page-2/#comment-120307</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in NOLa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 01:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/#comment-120307</guid>
		<description>I go with Barry on a trading opportunity basis. Ultimate bottom much further down.

I was going to put a little more in with some orders for ultralong ETF&#039;s I had set last night, but with the futures so bad, was afraid I&#039;d pay too much, so cancelled them to see if it would drop more at open, but instead prices came off the opening lows quickly. So, I stayed put. I suppose there will be more opportunity.

Am beginning to think the intermediate bottom may come with a whimper and not a bang.

Like tyaresun, I had bought some calls too high, but all almost all don&#039;t expire til Jan. so I ain&#039;t capitulating even though the current losses look discouraging. They can bounce back quickly in a rally. My only discomfort with them is if my wife asks how my trading is doing :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I go with Barry on a trading opportunity basis. Ultimate bottom much further down.</p>
<p>I was going to put a little more in with some orders for ultralong ETF&#8217;s I had set last night, but with the futures so bad, was afraid I&#8217;d pay too much, so cancelled them to see if it would drop more at open, but instead prices came off the opening lows quickly. So, I stayed put. I suppose there will be more opportunity.</p>
<p>Am beginning to think the intermediate bottom may come with a whimper and not a bang.</p>
<p>Like tyaresun, I had bought some calls too high, but all almost all don&#8217;t expire til Jan. so I ain&#8217;t capitulating even though the current losses look discouraging. They can bounce back quickly in a rally. My only discomfort with them is if my wife asks how my trading is doing :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/comment-page-1/#comment-120306</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 23:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/#comment-120306</guid>
		<description>Scott F. -

Its the economy, silly. Earnings flat-out SUCK. The Alt-A and option ARMs haven&#039;t begun re-setting in earnest. We have Birth/Death model catastrophically tilting the unemployment numbers. We have massive demographic (Boomers) that has been socking away the lion share of their income into the market and they are about to begin withdraws, in earnest.

We have banks hoarding capital. We have a FED that has lost control of the one thing they actually control. We have credit card debt that is higher than many countries GDP. We are at a point where each dollar of new debt has a Net negative effect to the GDP.

We have hedge funds blowing up. The alphabet soup the FED has created is not working. Auto makers are a hair away from total implosion. The consumer is close to saying no mas, if they haven&#039;t already (see closing and consolidation in retail land).

I have more... shall we go on?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott F. -</p>
<p>Its the economy, silly. Earnings flat-out SUCK. The Alt-A and option ARMs haven&#8217;t begun re-setting in earnest. We have Birth/Death model catastrophically tilting the unemployment numbers. We have massive demographic (Boomers) that has been socking away the lion share of their income into the market and they are about to begin withdraws, in earnest.</p>
<p>We have banks hoarding capital. We have a FED that has lost control of the one thing they actually control. We have credit card debt that is higher than many countries GDP. We are at a point where each dollar of new debt has a Net negative effect to the GDP.</p>
<p>We have hedge funds blowing up. The alphabet soup the FED has created is not working. Auto makers are a hair away from total implosion. The consumer is close to saying no mas, if they haven&#8217;t already (see closing and consolidation in retail land).</p>
<p>I have more&#8230; shall we go on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brion</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/comment-page-1/#comment-120305</link>
		<dc:creator>brion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/#comment-120305</guid>
		<description>yields for BAA-rated paper/bonds are high right now because demand for them is low. In Q1 1930, Baa paper waterfall&#039;ed from a yield of 6% to nearly 13% Q2 1932.
Yields for BAA-rated paper/bonds are high right now because demand for them is low.

Note that Moody has A and AA and AAA rated corporate bonds, which did NOT drop as much as the BAA.....This is a telling sign that the bond markets do NOT believe that the debt of these corporations are collectable per whatever period they sell for.

These are bond yields, on not the best rated, but still investment grade corporate bonds. It is the guys closer to the margin. Its not the worst of the worst, but given the fact many corporations don&#039;t have stellar ratings these days, you find there are quite a lot of them at or near the margin. Notice also the speed of this collapse. It happened within DAYS compared with the 30&#039;s MONTHS. The GDP collapse this implies will be much the same.




we&#039;re getting a different rhyme this time round from 1929. In &#039;29 the crash in oct/nov wasn&#039;t due to the bonds leading the way. But the April 30 bear market taking away 86% of the DOW WAS led by this paper.

One more reason I fear the chances of a &quot;rally&quot; are gonna be interesting
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yields for BAA-rated paper/bonds are high right now because demand for them is low. In Q1 1930, Baa paper waterfall&#8217;ed from a yield of 6% to nearly 13% Q2 1932.<br />
Yields for BAA-rated paper/bonds are high right now because demand for them is low.</p>
<p>Note that Moody has A and AA and AAA rated corporate bonds, which did NOT drop as much as the BAA&#8230;..This is a telling sign that the bond markets do NOT believe that the debt of these corporations are collectable per whatever period they sell for.</p>
<p>These are bond yields, on not the best rated, but still investment grade corporate bonds. It is the guys closer to the margin. Its not the worst of the worst, but given the fact many corporations don&#8217;t have stellar ratings these days, you find there are quite a lot of them at or near the margin. Notice also the speed of this collapse. It happened within DAYS compared with the 30&#8242;s MONTHS. The GDP collapse this implies will be much the same.</p>
<p>we&#8217;re getting a different rhyme this time round from 1929. In &#8217;29 the crash in oct/nov wasn&#8217;t due to the bonds leading the way. But the April 30 bear market taking away 86% of the DOW WAS led by this paper.</p>
<p>One more reason I fear the chances of a &#8220;rally&#8221; are gonna be interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brion</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/comment-page-1/#comment-120304</link>
		<dc:creator>brion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/#comment-120304</guid>
		<description>ok scott F. (or F. Scott as the case may be..) What sayest this?

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/fredgraph?chart_type=line&amp;width=1000&amp;height=600&amp;preserve_ratio=true&amp;s[1][id]=DBAA
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok scott F. (or F. Scott as the case may be..) What sayest this?</p>
<p><a href="http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/fredgraph?chart_type=line&#038;width=1000&#038;height=600&#038;preserve_ratio=true&#038;s1id=DBAA" rel="nofollow">http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/fredgraph?chart_type=line&#038;width=1000&#038;height=600&#038;preserve_ratio=true&#038;s1id=DBAA</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/comment-page-1/#comment-120303</link>
		<dc:creator>DP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/2008/10/another-buy-in/#comment-120303</guid>
		<description>The market will never go back up again I hear, &quot;it is different this time&quot;.

The thing is, every time we had a crash people thought &quot;it is different this time&quot;. If they hadn&#039;t thought it was different that time they would have been confident in the market and there wouldn&#039;t have been a crash in the first place.

The one thing that is exactly the same this time is that people think &quot;it is different this time&quot;.

I don&#039;t know where the bottom is, but I know we&#039;re at least 50% closer to it than we were a month ago. I&#039;m doing the same as Barry, easing in a few percent here and there over every leg down with a few puts to take the edge off.

My first post here btw, love the blog and have learned so much from it. Thanks Barry!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The market will never go back up again I hear, &#8220;it is different this time&#8221;.</p>
<p>The thing is, every time we had a crash people thought &#8220;it is different this time&#8221;. If they hadn&#8217;t thought it was different that time they would have been confident in the market and there wouldn&#8217;t have been a crash in the first place.</p>
<p>The one thing that is exactly the same this time is that people think &#8220;it is different this time&#8221;.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know where the bottom is, but I know we&#8217;re at least 50% closer to it than we were a month ago. I&#8217;m doing the same as Barry, easing in a few percent here and there over every leg down with a few puts to take the edge off.</p>
<p>My first post here btw, love the blog and have learned so much from it. Thanks Barry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

