<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recommended Investment Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/recommended-investment-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/recommended-investment-books/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lunatic fringe</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/recommended-investment-books/comment-page-1/#comment-132824</link>
		<dc:creator>lunatic fringe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/?p=6668#comment-132824</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read a good many of those books and agree with your inclusion of many of them on the &quot;recommended list. But as someone who threw out the &quot;buy and hold&quot; strategy as being a method for people who truly don&#039;t understand markets or risk, Siegel&#039;s book is currently acting as a doorstop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve read a good many of those books and agree with your inclusion of many of them on the &#8220;recommended list. But as someone who threw out the &#8220;buy and hold&#8221; strategy as being a method for people who truly don&#8217;t understand markets or risk, Siegel&#8217;s book is currently acting as a doorstop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bondjel</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/recommended-investment-books/comment-page-1/#comment-132631</link>
		<dc:creator>bondjel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/?p=6668#comment-132631</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a book i DON&#039;T SEE MENTIONED BY YOU THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE MUST by an MIT long-time expert on the great depression and business panics: &quot;Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises&quot;(Wiley Investment Classics) (Paperback) by Charles P. Kindleberger. Just the chapter on Fueling the Flames: The Expansion of Credit is worth the book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a book i DON&#8217;T SEE MENTIONED BY YOU THAT IS AN ABSOLUTE MUST by an MIT long-time expert on the great depression and business panics: &#8220;Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises&#8221;(Wiley Investment Classics) (Paperback) by Charles P. Kindleberger. Just the chapter on Fueling the Flames: The Expansion of Credit is worth the book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alex_sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/recommended-investment-books/comment-page-1/#comment-127767</link>
		<dc:creator>alex_sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 02:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ritholtz.vs3.wilder.ca/blog/?p=6668#comment-127767</guid>
		<description>First off, of the books I have read on this list, Freakonomics does not compare.  I was so infuriated by the book that I actually sat down and wrote a lengthy  letter to the author outlining the various errors in his reasoning, some of which rendered entire chapters of his book irrelevant.  I am not getting back into it, but that book should be reread and its inclusion on the list reevaluated IMO.

Also, since everyone cares, I think to exclude Nassim Taleb&#039;s second book: The Black Swan from this list is also an important oversight.  The discussion of the global financial system is disturbingly accurate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, of the books I have read on this list, Freakonomics does not compare.  I was so infuriated by the book that I actually sat down and wrote a lengthy  letter to the author outlining the various errors in his reasoning, some of which rendered entire chapters of his book irrelevant.  I am not getting back into it, but that book should be reread and its inclusion on the list reevaluated IMO.</p>
<p>Also, since everyone cares, I think to exclude Nassim Taleb&#8217;s second book: The Black Swan from this list is also an important oversight.  The discussion of the global financial system is disturbingly accurate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

