<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roundtable: Fed Chairmen and Presidents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/roundtable-fed-chairmen-and-presidents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/roundtable-fed-chairmen-and-presidents/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:06:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/roundtable-fed-chairmen-and-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-124124</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 07:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=7225#comment-124124</guid>
		<description>much like karen, I think this is an outstanding piece.  though, one thing caused me to pause, this:

The IRA: But don’t you want bankers who “get it” on the Board? Not sure that coming straight out of the CSUITE of a bank is a bad thing so long as the candidate understands that the priorities have changed and that he or she now serves the interests of the United States.

&quot; coming straight out of the CSUITE of a bank--to the FedRes-- is a bad thing so long as the candidate understands that the priorities have changed and that he or she now serves the interests of the United States.&quot;

much in the same vein as later discussion, above, is there a rigorous defense for this supposition: &quot;that he or she now serves the interests of the United States.( while they are at the FedRes )&quot;?

it&#039;s coming from IRA, should the Q be posed, directly, to them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>much like karen, I think this is an outstanding piece.  though, one thing caused me to pause, this:</p>
<p>The IRA: But don’t you want bankers who “get it” on the Board? Not sure that coming straight out of the CSUITE of a bank is a bad thing so long as the candidate understands that the priorities have changed and that he or she now serves the interests of the United States.</p>
<p>&#8221; coming straight out of the CSUITE of a bank&#8211;to the FedRes&#8211; is a bad thing so long as the candidate understands that the priorities have changed and that he or she now serves the interests of the United States.&#8221;</p>
<p>much in the same vein as later discussion, above, is there a rigorous defense for this supposition: &#8220;that he or she now serves the interests of the United States.( while they are at the FedRes )&#8221;?</p>
<p>it&#8217;s coming from IRA, should the Q be posed, directly, to them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/10/roundtable-fed-chairmen-and-presidents/comment-page-1/#comment-124060</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=7225#comment-124060</guid>
		<description>invaluable discussion, loaded with information.  thanks for posting, barry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>invaluable discussion, loaded with information.  thanks for posting, barry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
