<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10% Intraday Swing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/10-intraday-swing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/10-intraday-swing/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:00:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Winston Munn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/10-intraday-swing/comment-page-2/#comment-126299</link>
		<dc:creator>Winston Munn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9365#comment-126299</guid>
		<description>@ whosonfirst
Get Real in the fourth at Belmont?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ whosonfirst<br />
Get Real in the fourth at Belmont?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce in Tn</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/10-intraday-swing/comment-page-2/#comment-126271</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce in Tn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9365#comment-126271</guid>
		<description>Got to go mine some salt, but I agree with whosonfirst, and will give you my thoughts this afternoon.  I have seen news this morning, that when considering what is going to happen, makes me very quiet....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got to go mine some salt, but I agree with whosonfirst, and will give you my thoughts this afternoon.  I have seen news this morning, that when considering what is going to happen, makes me very quiet&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whosonfirst</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/10-intraday-swing/comment-page-2/#comment-126269</link>
		<dc:creator>whosonfirst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9365#comment-126269</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m on the sidelines.  My hobby is playing the horses.  You folks remind me so very much of racetrack touts.  You&#039;re so involved with your charts and theories.  My God, take a step back and look at the macroeconomic picture.  It&#039;s brutal and literally getting worse every day.

Is the bottom in?  Get real.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on the sidelines.  My hobby is playing the horses.  You folks remind me so very much of racetrack touts.  You&#8217;re so involved with your charts and theories.  My God, take a step back and look at the macroeconomic picture.  It&#8217;s brutal and literally getting worse every day.</p>
<p>Is the bottom in?  Get real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mudpuppy</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/10-intraday-swing/comment-page-2/#comment-126262</link>
		<dc:creator>mudpuppy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9365#comment-126262</guid>
		<description>After 30 years of using fundamental analysis I&#039;ve finally given it up.  For me being 100% cash and waiting for the trends and counter trends to develop is the only way to go.  Today was classic.  I notice a lot of posters here believe the market is going lower.  Perhaps they are right.  But I don&#039;t know where the market is going. I think that when you start to believe in a price direction you become &quot;anchored&quot; in that belief.  It begins to color your thinking.  You start holding onto positions you should sell because you are anchored to your thinking.  We are our own worst enemy.
I heard Barry a few week ago on Financial Sense.  I found him to be a breath of fresh air.  He was being interviewed by a super bull on gold and silver.  The interviewer&#039;s fundamental analysis of gold and silver was flawless.  Unfortunately he&#039;s losing money every day because the markets don&#039;t give a hoot about fundamental analysis.  Barry told him he could be right in his analysis, but all he knew was the price was going down.  When I heard this I thought to myself now here&#039;s someone who makes sense.
There are some good posters here and I thank you for your insights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 30 years of using fundamental analysis I&#8217;ve finally given it up.  For me being 100% cash and waiting for the trends and counter trends to develop is the only way to go.  Today was classic.  I notice a lot of posters here believe the market is going lower.  Perhaps they are right.  But I don&#8217;t know where the market is going. I think that when you start to believe in a price direction you become &#8220;anchored&#8221; in that belief.  It begins to color your thinking.  You start holding onto positions you should sell because you are anchored to your thinking.  We are our own worst enemy.<br />
I heard Barry a few week ago on Financial Sense.  I found him to be a breath of fresh air.  He was being interviewed by a super bull on gold and silver.  The interviewer&#8217;s fundamental analysis of gold and silver was flawless.  Unfortunately he&#8217;s losing money every day because the markets don&#8217;t give a hoot about fundamental analysis.  Barry told him he could be right in his analysis, but all he knew was the price was going down.  When I heard this I thought to myself now here&#8217;s someone who makes sense.<br />
There are some good posters here and I thank you for your insights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Tabbo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/10-intraday-swing/comment-page-2/#comment-126257</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Tabbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9365#comment-126257</guid>
		<description>DL:

All true...especially the part about Japan.  The counter argument to longer rates rallying is the fact that U.S. will be in slow growth/recessionary mode for many years to come.  See Japan.

To be honest, I&#039;m not a scholar on Japanese financial history, so I don&#039;t know how much debt raising they were doing to inflate themselves.  I know their rates have been very low forever, but did they swap massive amount of govt bonds in exchange for crap.  And was China sitting on Trillions of debt looking to cash in to support theirs own economy?  Was Japan simply doomed from the start because of the makeup of their population?

The deal is that everyone knows all this...if &quot;we&quot; know this, then the Trillion dollar U.S. bond market knows all of this....so I&#039;ve been waiting on some technical evidence to conclude it&#039;s OVER for the long bonds....and I&#039;m starting to get some of that evidence.  I could be wrong....and I&#039;ve got stops on the trade....If the 10 yr Dec futures start trading above 117&#039;oo, then I&#039;ll be proven wrong technically shorter term.

- AT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DL:</p>
<p>All true&#8230;especially the part about Japan.  The counter argument to longer rates rallying is the fact that U.S. will be in slow growth/recessionary mode for many years to come.  See Japan.</p>
<p>To be honest, I&#8217;m not a scholar on Japanese financial history, so I don&#8217;t know how much debt raising they were doing to inflate themselves.  I know their rates have been very low forever, but did they swap massive amount of govt bonds in exchange for crap.  And was China sitting on Trillions of debt looking to cash in to support theirs own economy?  Was Japan simply doomed from the start because of the makeup of their population?</p>
<p>The deal is that everyone knows all this&#8230;if &#8220;we&#8221; know this, then the Trillion dollar U.S. bond market knows all of this&#8230;.so I&#8217;ve been waiting on some technical evidence to conclude it&#8217;s OVER for the long bonds&#8230;.and I&#8217;m starting to get some of that evidence.  I could be wrong&#8230;.and I&#8217;ve got stops on the trade&#8230;.If the 10 yr Dec futures start trading above 117&#8242;oo, then I&#8217;ll be proven wrong technically shorter term.</p>
<p>- AT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/10-intraday-swing/comment-page-2/#comment-126256</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9365#comment-126256</guid>
		<description>Andy Tabbo @ 10:53

“Will the U.S. longer term bonds be the last asset domino to fall?  Will the ever- steepening yield curve go completely parabolic?”

I’m inclined to think so, but it’s a question of timing.     We probably won’t see a big rise in T-bond yields over the next 12 months.     But at some point thereafter, I do think that could become an issue.        The bear case for T-bonds rests in part on the mortgage-based assets and other collateral that the government will be holding.  The Fed is holding mortgage-based assets on which they  have (thus far) lent two trillion dollars.     The new plan is for the Treasury to accept assets based on credit card debt and car loans (in addition to what the Fed is holding).         After all is said and done, the government (Treasury plus the Fed) could be sitting on many trillions of dollars worth of “stuff”.         Given that, the Fed may be under pressure to inflate the nominal value of that collateral, or at least to keep that collateral from declining in value.         Hence the Fed is likely to be restrained in any tightening of monetary policy that would otherwise occur in 2010.        So that creates potential inflationary pressure, which could push up T-bond rates.     
  Then of course, the higher the debt-to-GDP ratio, the greater the pressure to monetize the debt.        And of course the deficit will be rising, although the government will no doubt play all sorts of games with the numbers.    
  (The only thing that gives me pause in this analysis is the low rates on government bonds in Japan).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy Tabbo @ 10:53</p>
<p>“Will the U.S. longer term bonds be the last asset domino to fall?  Will the ever- steepening yield curve go completely parabolic?”</p>
<p>I’m inclined to think so, but it’s a question of timing.     We probably won’t see a big rise in T-bond yields over the next 12 months.     But at some point thereafter, I do think that could become an issue.        The bear case for T-bonds rests in part on the mortgage-based assets and other collateral that the government will be holding.  The Fed is holding mortgage-based assets on which they  have (thus far) lent two trillion dollars.     The new plan is for the Treasury to accept assets based on credit card debt and car loans (in addition to what the Fed is holding).         After all is said and done, the government (Treasury plus the Fed) could be sitting on many trillions of dollars worth of “stuff”.         Given that, the Fed may be under pressure to inflate the nominal value of that collateral, or at least to keep that collateral from declining in value.         Hence the Fed is likely to be restrained in any tightening of monetary policy that would otherwise occur in 2010.        So that creates potential inflationary pressure, which could push up T-bond rates.<br />
  Then of course, the higher the debt-to-GDP ratio, the greater the pressure to monetize the debt.        And of course the deficit will be rising, although the government will no doubt play all sorts of games with the numbers.<br />
  (The only thing that gives me pause in this analysis is the low rates on government bonds in Japan).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: busterman343</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/10-intraday-swing/comment-page-2/#comment-126255</link>
		<dc:creator>busterman343</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9365#comment-126255</guid>
		<description>RE: Michael

The stock rally started as we bounced from technical levels around 1PM.  The sell off in bonds did not occur until well into the stock rally close to 2PM.  

This was almost an entirely psychological rally, compounded by short covering and piggybacking.  The bond sell-off may have helped, but it was NOT the cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Michael</p>
<p>The stock rally started as we bounced from technical levels around 1PM.  The sell off in bonds did not occur until well into the stock rally close to 2PM.  </p>
<p>This was almost an entirely psychological rally, compounded by short covering and piggybacking.  The bond sell-off may have helped, but it was NOT the cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/10-intraday-swing/comment-page-2/#comment-126253</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9365#comment-126253</guid>
		<description>Calling a bottom here? Nuts.

What on earth makes you think technicals apply in this market? There is simply too much meddlingfor any of it to work. What technicals factor in the scary FED charts? How about NONE!

The horribly expensive long bond auction today is what caused this rally. You guys need to look at ALL the data before you make ridiculous proclamations.  Jeeze, I&#039;m not even an active trader and I can clearly see what caused this rally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling a bottom here? Nuts.</p>
<p>What on earth makes you think technicals apply in this market? There is simply too much meddlingfor any of it to work. What technicals factor in the scary FED charts? How about NONE!</p>
<p>The horribly expensive long bond auction today is what caused this rally. You guys need to look at ALL the data before you make ridiculous proclamations.  Jeeze, I&#8217;m not even an active trader and I can clearly see what caused this rally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Tabbo</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/10-intraday-swing/comment-page-2/#comment-126252</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Tabbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9365#comment-126252</guid>
		<description>I guess what I&#039;m wondering  about in re: US bonds and rates is the following....

Remember a long, long time ago (a few months) when everyone was saying: 

&quot;We just need the dollar to rally so that Commodities will come down...then we&#039;ll be &#039;OK&#039; &quot;

That same crowd...and I mean the VERY SAME crowd is now saying:

&quot;We need to get investors out of these US bonds and get them into riskier assets...when Interest Rates start going up, then that will be a good sign and then we&#039;ll be &#039;OK&#039;&quot;

There&#039;s been loads and loads of bond guys that have come on CNBC the last several months talking about the US bond bubble out there....until now I sort of wanted to always fade them because it meant they were really short &quot;the irrational long bonds&quot;....but I&#039;m starting to think that the long bonds are very vulnerable to a sharp decline.

And, while the madding crowds may at first cheer the fall in the long bonds, just like they did with the stronger dollar, a long bond that really falls out of bed will not be a good thing.....

Will the U.S. longer term bonds be the last asset domino to fall?  Will the ever steepening yield curve go completely parabolic?

It&#039;s what I&#039;m now thinking about late this night...

- AT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess what I&#8217;m wondering  about in re: US bonds and rates is the following&#8230;.</p>
<p>Remember a long, long time ago (a few months) when everyone was saying: </p>
<p>&#8220;We just need the dollar to rally so that Commodities will come down&#8230;then we&#8217;ll be &#8216;OK&#8217; &#8221;</p>
<p>That same crowd&#8230;and I mean the VERY SAME crowd is now saying:</p>
<p>&#8220;We need to get investors out of these US bonds and get them into riskier assets&#8230;when Interest Rates start going up, then that will be a good sign and then we&#8217;ll be &#8216;OK&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s been loads and loads of bond guys that have come on CNBC the last several months talking about the US bond bubble out there&#8230;.until now I sort of wanted to always fade them because it meant they were really short &#8220;the irrational long bonds&#8221;&#8230;.but I&#8217;m starting to think that the long bonds are very vulnerable to a sharp decline.</p>
<p>And, while the madding crowds may at first cheer the fall in the long bonds, just like they did with the stronger dollar, a long bond that really falls out of bed will not be a good thing&#8230;..</p>
<p>Will the U.S. longer term bonds be the last asset domino to fall?  Will the ever steepening yield curve go completely parabolic?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s what I&#8217;m now thinking about late this night&#8230;</p>
<p>- AT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiltartan</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/10-intraday-swing/comment-page-2/#comment-126250</link>
		<dc:creator>kiltartan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 03:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9365#comment-126250</guid>
		<description>@DP:   I thought about going all cash and dividing it 1/24, investing 1/24 every two weeks for the next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DP:   I thought about going all cash and dividing it 1/24, investing 1/24 every two weeks for the next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
