A conversation with Vikram Pandit, CEO of Citigroup

Email this post Print this post
By Barry Ritholtz - November 26th, 2008, 12:30PM

Comments

Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.

5 Responses to “A conversation with Vikram Pandit, CEO of Citigroup”

  1. sm90401 Says:

    Is it possible to short Vikram Pandit, if so I’m a huge naked shorter. His basic message: not our fault, we could have never known! pathetic.

  2. timpe Says:

    This interview leaves me fuming. Rose asks real, pertinent questions and Pandit answers with one slogan after another. This imbecile just got bailed out with a huge amount of our money? This makes me question everything, and maybe those, like Mark Faber and Jim Rogers are on to something when they suggest these guys will be back for more and it will only end when the US declares bankruptcy.

  3. woolybear1 Says:

    Pandit the Bandit, an incompetent jerk.

  4. wingnut Says:

    Right, no mistakes were made at Citi, he says, and no risk manager could have seen the housing crash coming. I guess that means no lessons have been learned from those non-mistakes, and nothing’s wrong with their risk management.

  5. enfant terrible Says:

    It amazes me that this nincompoop is considered a financial brain who is among the smartest in the room. He had nothing new to offer except that he has been at Citi for 11 months and no more. How easy it is to say we were all in it together! Is is surprising that C will continue to remain in the quagmire till he is around and Robert Rubin to bail him out of his incompetence to protect his “reputation”. God Bless the Dollar now. That is really the only resort, isn’t it?

57 queries. 0.302 seconds.