<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ECRI Leading Indicators Fall to Lowest Level Ever</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/ecri-lei-lowest-ever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/ecri-lei-lowest-ever/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:00:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mikaeel</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/ecri-lei-lowest-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-129271</link>
		<dc:creator>mikaeel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 03:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10798#comment-129271</guid>
		<description>It used to be cheaper to buy than to rent. That went for cars as well as homes. In NYC, even as prices drop you still can&#039;t make a profit buying a one family home and renting it out. No one will pay a rent that&#039;ll cover the mortgage.  That is unless you turn your garage or basement into an illegal apartment and rent it out as a second apartment.
When being the landlord of a one family house is profitable again maybe the economy will right itself.

The American dream used to be, own a house and live comfortably. People rushed to own homes but forgot about the comfortable living part. The establishment oversold the idea of home ownership. People were willing to put common sense aside and jump all in, the truth be damned. Up until about six months or so I had relatives and co-workers who thought it was impossible for home price to drop. People were buying homes not as places to live, but as short term investment vehicles. The market was over bought. I have a couple of co-workers in the 60&#039;s who can&#039;t retire because they can&#039;t sell homes that are now under water because of home equity loans.

There&#039;s a story of stock broker who was on an elevator just before the crash of &#039;29. He over heard the elevator operator talking about a stock he had purchased. This broker realized it was time to get out of the market. When elevator operators are buying in, he felt, the market was over bought.

I don&#039;t know about indicators, but when a bunch of people want to sell and nobody&#039;s buying, prices go down.
For the year - wheat prices, down; oil prices, down; housing prices, down; stock market, down. I think this is going to last a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It used to be cheaper to buy than to rent. That went for cars as well as homes. In NYC, even as prices drop you still can&#8217;t make a profit buying a one family home and renting it out. No one will pay a rent that&#8217;ll cover the mortgage.  That is unless you turn your garage or basement into an illegal apartment and rent it out as a second apartment.<br />
When being the landlord of a one family house is profitable again maybe the economy will right itself.</p>
<p>The American dream used to be, own a house and live comfortably. People rushed to own homes but forgot about the comfortable living part. The establishment oversold the idea of home ownership. People were willing to put common sense aside and jump all in, the truth be damned. Up until about six months or so I had relatives and co-workers who thought it was impossible for home price to drop. People were buying homes not as places to live, but as short term investment vehicles. The market was over bought. I have a couple of co-workers in the 60&#8217;s who can&#8217;t retire because they can&#8217;t sell homes that are now under water because of home equity loans.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a story of stock broker who was on an elevator just before the crash of &#8216;29. He over heard the elevator operator talking about a stock he had purchased. This broker realized it was time to get out of the market. When elevator operators are buying in, he felt, the market was over bought.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about indicators, but when a bunch of people want to sell and nobody&#8217;s buying, prices go down.<br />
For the year &#8211; wheat prices, down; oil prices, down; housing prices, down; stock market, down. I think this is going to last a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrickStar</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/ecri-lei-lowest-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-129235</link>
		<dc:creator>TrickStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10798#comment-129235</guid>
		<description>Jurgen - Thanks.  That was very helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jurgen &#8211; Thanks.  That was very helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taninvest</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/ecri-lei-lowest-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-129227</link>
		<dc:creator>taninvest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10798#comment-129227</guid>
		<description>leading indicator &quot;predicted&quot; recession in 2007 &amp; also in 1987?
there was a shallow drop in 1982, but a fairly long &amp; deep recession--especially in the West (resource dependant)
as pointed out earlier, how much of index fall due to stock market decline?
is stock market over-discounting deep recession?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>leading indicator &#8220;predicted&#8221; recession in 2007 &amp; also in 1987?<br />
there was a shallow drop in 1982, but a fairly long &amp; deep recession&#8211;especially in the West (resource dependant)<br />
as pointed out earlier, how much of index fall due to stock market decline?<br />
is stock market over-discounting deep recession?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aerodynamichaircut</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/ecri-lei-lowest-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-129201</link>
		<dc:creator>aerodynamichaircut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10798#comment-129201</guid>
		<description>Good luck finding someone to help you get back on your wheelchair.  LOL!

The stock markets behavior constantly evolves.  Something tells me that this time around, those searching the history books who make postdictive data decisions on how to time the bottom will get worked, even if they get in close to the near term bottom.  It will likely be some unforeseen event that sends the indexes on a new leg down, leaving many with no opportunity to get out near the last prior bottom.   Moral hazard has stacked up over the years to the point where 40% down in the indexes is not nearly commensurate with what the piper demands.  Some inevitability seems to be hiding around the corner.  Even the American public senses this, as they are generally opposed to these bailouts.  &quot;Having to do something&quot; about the crisis does not necessitate throwing insane amounts of money at each problem.  The solution to this problem is not that obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck finding someone to help you get back on your wheelchair.  LOL!</p>
<p>The stock markets behavior constantly evolves.  Something tells me that this time around, those searching the history books who make postdictive data decisions on how to time the bottom will get worked, even if they get in close to the near term bottom.  It will likely be some unforeseen event that sends the indexes on a new leg down, leaving many with no opportunity to get out near the last prior bottom.   Moral hazard has stacked up over the years to the point where 40% down in the indexes is not nearly commensurate with what the piper demands.  Some inevitability seems to be hiding around the corner.  Even the American public senses this, as they are generally opposed to these bailouts.  &#8220;Having to do something&#8221; about the crisis does not necessitate throwing insane amounts of money at each problem.  The solution to this problem is not that obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wildbluyonder</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/ecri-lei-lowest-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-129185</link>
		<dc:creator>wildbluyonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 06:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10798#comment-129185</guid>
		<description>STOP STOP PLEASEEE, YOU GUYS!!! I&#039;m laughing so hard I almost fell out of my wheelchair, really thank you all for your wit.  It is a well deserved tonic for me (1947).  As I find myself facing a bright screen during &quot;this one more occasion of my observing this particular day in this life-cycle-season&quot;.   It is generally noted for being an opportunity to remember our many blessings.  Laughter has always been a blessing to me, so I thank whomever is responsible -- and that includes all of you. Goodnight</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STOP STOP PLEASEEE, YOU GUYS!!! I&#8217;m laughing so hard I almost fell out of my wheelchair, really thank you all for your wit.  It is a well deserved tonic for me (1947).  As I find myself facing a bright screen during &#8220;this one more occasion of my observing this particular day in this life-cycle-season&#8221;.   It is generally noted for being an opportunity to remember our many blessings.  Laughter has always been a blessing to me, so I thank whomever is responsible &#8212; and that includes all of you. Goodnight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tidervan</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/ecri-lei-lowest-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-129159</link>
		<dc:creator>tidervan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 02:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10798#comment-129159</guid>
		<description>Barry,

Would be interesting to see the S&amp;P overlayed on the above chart...thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry,</p>
<p>Would be interesting to see the S&amp;P overlayed on the above chart&#8230;thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jurgen</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/ecri-lei-lowest-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-129147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurgen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10798#comment-129147</guid>
		<description>BR: &quot;The current story they tell is clearly one of a quickly worsening recession with no end in sight&quot;

Barry,

Lakshman’s interpretation of the index -- “Weekly Leading Index has fallen to another historical low, indicating that there is no economic recovery in sight” -- is wrong, possibly biased and misleading (he is heavily positioned on the short side and lacks objectivity.  In addition, he has been in a house of pain since last Friday).

Here is how Geoffrey Moore, the inventor of this index, would interpret it...

The index has fallen to another historical low.  It was pushed down by another historical commodity and stock prices drop (commodity and stock prices are part of the index) that resulted from another wave of hedge fund margin calls, retail panic and redemptions, and forced hedge fund liquidations (note, the reasons for the drop were more technical than economic [terrible economic data has already been discounted and discounted and over discounted by the market]). In addition, the index was calculated using last week’s data (last week’s “leading” indicators); therefore, it does not reflect the most recent 15-20% jump up in commodity and stock prices. Next week, the index will be higher, and it is possible that it is a turning point that usually occurs at these levels – it could be the turning point and “the end is in sight”.

P.S.  The index is important but as Geoffrey Moore said, “interpreting it requires informed judgment”. It is obvious that Lakshman lacks such judgment. Take what he says with a large grain of salt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BR: &#8220;The current story they tell is clearly one of a quickly worsening recession with no end in sight&#8221;</p>
<p>Barry,</p>
<p>Lakshman’s interpretation of the index &#8212; “Weekly Leading Index has fallen to another historical low, indicating that there is no economic recovery in sight” &#8212; is wrong, possibly biased and misleading (he is heavily positioned on the short side and lacks objectivity.  In addition, he has been in a house of pain since last Friday).</p>
<p>Here is how Geoffrey Moore, the inventor of this index, would interpret it&#8230;</p>
<p>The index has fallen to another historical low.  It was pushed down by another historical commodity and stock prices drop (commodity and stock prices are part of the index) that resulted from another wave of hedge fund margin calls, retail panic and redemptions, and forced hedge fund liquidations (note, the reasons for the drop were more technical than economic [terrible economic data has already been discounted and discounted and over discounted by the market]). In addition, the index was calculated using last week’s data (last week’s “leading” indicators); therefore, it does not reflect the most recent 15-20% jump up in commodity and stock prices. Next week, the index will be higher, and it is possible that it is a turning point that usually occurs at these levels – it could be the turning point and “the end is in sight”.</p>
<p>P.S.  The index is important but as Geoffrey Moore said, “interpreting it requires informed judgment”. It is obvious that Lakshman lacks such judgment. Take what he says with a large grain of salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Ponzi</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/ecri-lei-lowest-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-129113</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Ponzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10798#comment-129113</guid>
		<description>Wow,

I agree with Trickstar.  Very few above have bothered to read what this might mean.

Unfortunately for most, running with the herd means they don&#039;t see what&#039;s going on outside.  That includes herds running north or south.  Or East or West for that matter.

Chuck Ponzi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow,</p>
<p>I agree with Trickstar.  Very few above have bothered to read what this might mean.</p>
<p>Unfortunately for most, running with the herd means they don&#8217;t see what&#8217;s going on outside.  That includes herds running north or south.  Or East or West for that matter.</p>
<p>Chuck Ponzi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrickStar</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/ecri-lei-lowest-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-129075</link>
		<dc:creator>TrickStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 19:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10798#comment-129075</guid>
		<description>DL - LOL.  They&#039;re black.  Why?  They do have parentheses around them (for some reason).  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DL &#8211; LOL.  They&#8217;re black.  Why?  They do have parentheses around them (for some reason).  <img src='http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/ecri-lei-lowest-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-129065</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10798#comment-129065</guid>
		<description>TrickStar   @ 12:47

“I’ll bet my entire 2008 stock market returns that …”

    I’m assuming that they’re in the green.


(I, on the other hand, will happily bet my entire 2008 returns that pigs will fly tomorrow).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TrickStar   @ 12:47</p>
<p>“I’ll bet my entire 2008 stock market returns that …”</p>
<p>    I’m assuming that they’re in the green.</p>
<p>(I, on the other hand, will happily bet my entire 2008 returns that pigs will fly tomorrow).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
