<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here or There: No Place to Hide</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/here-or-there-no-place-to-hide/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/here-or-there-no-place-to-hide/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:43:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/here-or-there-no-place-to-hide/comment-page-1/#comment-125925</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9210#comment-125925</guid>
		<description>I expect maybe one more down day before a bounce. Vix approaching 70. Barry mentioned possibility of a trading range. Thought Hussman had a good attitude towards the situation in his weekly comment:

&quot;Presently, observable evidence suggests that stocks are no longer strenuously overvalued, as they have been for over a decade (with the consequence that stocks have lagged Treasury bills over that period). Observable evidence also suggests that the washout last month was spectacular enough (and the breadth reversal substantial enough) to allow for – not ensure – a sustained advance. This could occur even within the context of an ongoing bear market, if only to allow the natural ebb and flow of data to confirm or refute the fears already impounded into stock prices. On average, similar conditions have provided a basis for strong, if impermanent, recoveries – most likely beyond the extent that we observed through last Tuesday. The selloff we saw late last week looked a lot like a standard “re-test.” A large expansion in trading volume during the next advance, whenever it comes, would add to the sustainability of a rebound.&quot;

I expect that there will be some unexpected good news, e.g. a sudden deal on GM,  that will let loose some of the pent up demand waiting for an entry point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect maybe one more down day before a bounce. Vix approaching 70. Barry mentioned possibility of a trading range. Thought Hussman had a good attitude towards the situation in his weekly comment:</p>
<p>&#8220;Presently, observable evidence suggests that stocks are no longer strenuously overvalued, as they have been for over a decade (with the consequence that stocks have lagged Treasury bills over that period). Observable evidence also suggests that the washout last month was spectacular enough (and the breadth reversal substantial enough) to allow for – not ensure – a sustained advance. This could occur even within the context of an ongoing bear market, if only to allow the natural ebb and flow of data to confirm or refute the fears already impounded into stock prices. On average, similar conditions have provided a basis for strong, if impermanent, recoveries – most likely beyond the extent that we observed through last Tuesday. The selloff we saw late last week looked a lot like a standard “re-test.” A large expansion in trading volume during the next advance, whenever it comes, would add to the sustainability of a rebound.&#8221;</p>
<p>I expect that there will be some unexpected good news, e.g. a sudden deal on GM,  that will let loose some of the pent up demand waiting for an entry point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ Foehr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/here-or-there-no-place-to-hide/comment-page-1/#comment-125892</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ Foehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9210#comment-125892</guid>
		<description>DP,

Agreed.  It would take a lot to overcome the gloom of today&#039;s action and Intel&#039;s lowered guidance.  Look like new lows probably early tomorrow -- after that, who knows?  But there should be another bounce out there somewhere...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DP,</p>
<p>Agreed.  It would take a lot to overcome the gloom of today&#8217;s action and Intel&#8217;s lowered guidance.  Look like new lows probably early tomorrow &#8212; after that, who knows?  But there should be another bounce out there somewhere&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/here-or-there-no-place-to-hide/comment-page-1/#comment-125883</link>
		<dc:creator>DP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9210#comment-125883</guid>
		<description>The chances of a bounce tomorrow just got much lower, thanks Intel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The chances of a bounce tomorrow just got much lower, thanks Intel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ Foehr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/here-or-there-no-place-to-hide/comment-page-1/#comment-125881</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ Foehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9210#comment-125881</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m counting on it with EEV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m counting on it with EEV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
