<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Citi about to WAMU ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/is-citi-about-to-wamu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/is-citi-about-to-wamu/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: super_trooper</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/is-citi-about-to-wamu/comment-page-1/#comment-127886</link>
		<dc:creator>super_trooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10272#comment-127886</guid>
		<description>why would the gov  put COMMON EQUIY into banks under TARP II. Just take over the whole company, by force, fight it out in the course later if needed. There should be just 1 single shareholder if the gov puts in money at this point. Screw the previous shareholders. That&#039;s the Swedish model and it worked well. The government was very aggressive, took over Nordbanken put the bad debt in a separate holding company and sold Nordbanken (now Nordea) a few years later. Rapid action is needed, now. Paulsen doesn&#039;t know what he&#039;s facing nor what he&#039;s doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why would the gov  put COMMON EQUIY into banks under TARP II. Just take over the whole company, by force, fight it out in the course later if needed. There should be just 1 single shareholder if the gov puts in money at this point. Screw the previous shareholders. That&#8217;s the Swedish model and it worked well. The government was very aggressive, took over Nordbanken put the bad debt in a separate holding company and sold Nordbanken (now Nordea) a few years later. Rapid action is needed, now. Paulsen doesn&#8217;t know what he&#8217;s facing nor what he&#8217;s doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: super_trooper</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/is-citi-about-to-wamu/comment-page-1/#comment-127879</link>
		<dc:creator>super_trooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10272#comment-127879</guid>
		<description>The $25 billion for auto companies will look like small change. Why even bother estimating the fed budget deficit. Heck of a job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The $25 billion for auto companies will look like small change. Why even bother estimating the fed budget deficit. Heck of a job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: super_trooper</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/is-citi-about-to-wamu/comment-page-1/#comment-127878</link>
		<dc:creator>super_trooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10272#comment-127878</guid>
		<description>down another 20%. Citi won&#039;t last longer than next week. There&#039;ll be frantic activity this weekend. &#039;ll give it until next week. Can anybody afford buying  it or will the gov have to step in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>down another 20%. Citi won&#8217;t last longer than next week. There&#8217;ll be frantic activity this weekend. &#8216;ll give it until next week. Can anybody afford buying  it or will the gov have to step in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Whalen</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/is-citi-about-to-wamu/comment-page-1/#comment-127876</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Whalen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10272#comment-127876</guid>
		<description>Citi won&#039;t do a WaMu.  After the WaMu resolution, when the parent company debt and equity holders got torched, the central banks called the Treasury and the Fed and basically said WTF are you doing?  Thus we had open bank assistance with the Wachovia sale.  

C could go to zero today or next week.  All that means that Uncle must get off his duff and put COMMON EQUIY into banks under TARP II.  M. El Arian  said it well on CNBC today.  Citi as a bank is fine, but as a PUBLIC EQUITY investment, it is toast, crap, muerto, kaput.  That is the legacy of fair value accounting, where all complex financial institutions are insolvent.  

If price=value, then all large banks in the US are insolvent and all public shareholders of these banks are toast.  Thanks again to the FASB and Chris Cox for implementing FVA last year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citi won&#8217;t do a WaMu.  After the WaMu resolution, when the parent company debt and equity holders got torched, the central banks called the Treasury and the Fed and basically said WTF are you doing?  Thus we had open bank assistance with the Wachovia sale.  </p>
<p>C could go to zero today or next week.  All that means that Uncle must get off his duff and put COMMON EQUIY into banks under TARP II.  M. El Arian  said it well on CNBC today.  Citi as a bank is fine, but as a PUBLIC EQUITY investment, it is toast, crap, muerto, kaput.  That is the legacy of fair value accounting, where all complex financial institutions are insolvent.  </p>
<p>If price=value, then all large banks in the US are insolvent and all public shareholders of these banks are toast.  Thanks again to the FASB and Chris Cox for implementing FVA last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vdhinaka</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/is-citi-about-to-wamu/comment-page-1/#comment-127837</link>
		<dc:creator>vdhinaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10272#comment-127837</guid>
		<description>Who is next to WAMU? Citadel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is next to WAMU? Citadel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim C</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/is-citi-about-to-wamu/comment-page-1/#comment-127832</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10272#comment-127832</guid>
		<description>C0ruscation - that chart is adjusted for the splits...so he is up about 100% in 17 years or so.  Not great.  however, his dividends have probably totalled over $10/share since then, so still looks like he did well on his $2.50ish stock purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C0ruscation &#8211; that chart is adjusted for the splits&#8230;so he is up about 100% in 17 years or so.  Not great.  however, his dividends have probably totalled over $10/share since then, so still looks like he did well on his $2.50ish stock purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wunsacon</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/is-citi-about-to-wamu/comment-page-1/#comment-127825</link>
		<dc:creator>wunsacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10272#comment-127825</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt; folks are right, this site needs a preview function for comments.

I&#039;m looking forward to a preview function for my trades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt; folks are right, this site needs a preview function for comments.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to a preview function for my trades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greenie</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/is-citi-about-to-wamu/comment-page-1/#comment-127816</link>
		<dc:creator>greenie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10272#comment-127816</guid>
		<description>Big surprise that the board is meeting to cut the company up for some sort of fire sale of the assets. I think the FDIC will pull a WAMU on the deposit part of the company...Maybe GS will get their deposit base at a nice discount..better than buying the whole messed up company and their bad paper too..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big surprise that the board is meeting to cut the company up for some sort of fire sale of the assets. I think the FDIC will pull a WAMU on the deposit part of the company&#8230;Maybe GS will get their deposit base at a nice discount..better than buying the whole messed up company and their bad paper too..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alent1234</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/is-citi-about-to-wamu/comment-page-1/#comment-127815</link>
		<dc:creator>alent1234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10272#comment-127815</guid>
		<description>The good prince sold all his Citi stock back in 2005 or 2006. i saw the interview after he sold it, but can&#039;t remember when. i bet he&#039;s buying the same shares now he sold a few years ago at a nice discount</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good prince sold all his Citi stock back in 2005 or 2006. i saw the interview after he sold it, but can&#8217;t remember when. i bet he&#8217;s buying the same shares now he sold a few years ago at a nice discount</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: insaneclownposse</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/is-citi-about-to-wamu/comment-page-1/#comment-127805</link>
		<dc:creator>insaneclownposse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10272#comment-127805</guid>
		<description>folks are right, this site needs a preview function for comments. Previous post should read &quot;People have been fearful for the last six months, but unless you bought yesterday, you&#039;ve had your ass handed to you.&quot;

my apologies</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>folks are right, this site needs a preview function for comments. Previous post should read &#8220;People have been fearful for the last six months, but unless you bought yesterday, you&#8217;ve had your ass handed to you.&#8221;</p>
<p>my apologies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

