<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jan Hatzius: Unemployment at 8% by End of 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/jan-hatzius-unemployment-at-8-by-end-of-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/jan-hatzius-unemployment-at-8-by-end-of-2009/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:43:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/jan-hatzius-unemployment-at-8-by-end-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-125039</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 00:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8464#comment-125039</guid>
		<description>KJ, 

the &#039;transition&#039; has, for all intents and purposes, already occured.  BHO, and many other (D)s,  is/are, already, as of today, at the latest, on the record for more &#039;stimulus&#039;..

nobody, in 2010, will be taken seriously if they produce a &#039;Stimulus Bill&#039; timestamped pre-01/20/009 and say that it was GWB&#039;s doing..

past that, though, you have a funny definition of &#039;altruistic&#039;..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KJ, </p>
<p>the &#8216;transition&#8217; has, for all intents and purposes, already occured.  BHO, and many other (D)s,  is/are, already, as of today, at the latest, on the record for more &#8217;stimulus&#8217;..</p>
<p>nobody, in 2010, will be taken seriously if they produce a &#8216;Stimulus Bill&#8217; timestamped pre-01/20/009 and say that it was GWB&#8217;s doing..</p>
<p>past that, though, you have a funny definition of &#8216;altruistic&#8217;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leftback</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/jan-hatzius-unemployment-at-8-by-end-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-125003</link>
		<dc:creator>leftback</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 20:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8464#comment-125003</guid>
		<description>KJ, unless you want to see that 8% unemployment turn into 10 or 12%, there is no time to lose. The positive feedback process, vicious cycle that relates jobs housing and banks is in full flow and needs to be slowed down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KJ, unless you want to see that 8% unemployment turn into 10 or 12%, there is no time to lose. The positive feedback process, vicious cycle that relates jobs housing and banks is in full flow and needs to be slowed down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ Foehr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/jan-hatzius-unemployment-at-8-by-end-of-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-124984</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ Foehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8464#comment-124984</guid>
		<description>Fiscal stimulus is a given at this point.  But I wonder why would the Dems do it in the lame duck session and thus give W credit for doing it on his watch?  

From the Democratic perspective wouldn’t it make a lot more sense to wait until after inauguration so they and Obama can clearly take full credit for it?  I think if I were Obama, that is what I would push for.  But that would hurt the economy by delaying the beneficial effects; so will he / they be as scheming as me, or will they be altruistic in this crisis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fiscal stimulus is a given at this point.  But I wonder why would the Dems do it in the lame duck session and thus give W credit for doing it on his watch?  </p>
<p>From the Democratic perspective wouldn’t it make a lot more sense to wait until after inauguration so they and Obama can clearly take full credit for it?  I think if I were Obama, that is what I would push for.  But that would hurt the economy by delaying the beneficial effects; so will he / they be as scheming as me, or will they be altruistic in this crisis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
