<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jeremy Grantham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/jeremy-grantham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/jeremy-grantham/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:30:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KJ Foehr</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/jeremy-grantham/comment-page-1/#comment-129057</link>
		<dc:creator>KJ Foehr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 18:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10941#comment-129057</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the post.

The voice of true wisdom.

Great interview;  CNBC was shortsighted in dumping Consuelo Mack.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the post.</p>
<p>The voice of true wisdom.</p>
<p>Great interview;  CNBC was shortsighted in dumping Consuelo Mack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wunsacon</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/jeremy-grantham/comment-page-1/#comment-128992</link>
		<dc:creator>wunsacon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10941#comment-128992</guid>
		<description>Oh dear lord...  I hereby profess my love -- LOVE -- for Jeremy Grantham.  

Previously, I read an occasional excerpt from his writing.  But, never read/heard a chunk like this.  Thanks, BR.  Great stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear lord&#8230;  I hereby profess my love &#8212; LOVE &#8212; for Jeremy Grantham.  </p>
<p>Previously, I read an occasional excerpt from his writing.  But, never read/heard a chunk like this.  Thanks, BR.  Great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrickStar</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/jeremy-grantham/comment-page-1/#comment-128941</link>
		<dc:creator>TrickStar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10941#comment-128941</guid>
		<description>In his recent newsletter, which I have linked to here at BP many times, he cited a range of 740 to 585 as a low range.   Granted, that&#039;s quite a range, but to hear him point to the low side is chilling.   In general, I like the gray haired guys that don&#039;t talk to the media much and actually base their opinions on a minimum of 10 years of research and up to 200 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his recent newsletter, which I have linked to here at BP many times, he cited a range of 740 to 585 as a low range.   Granted, that&#8217;s quite a range, but to hear him point to the low side is chilling.   In general, I like the gray haired guys that don&#8217;t talk to the media much and actually base their opinions on a minimum of 10 years of research and up to 200 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/jeremy-grantham/comment-page-1/#comment-128920</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=10941#comment-128920</guid>
		<description>JG suggests market is likely going to around 600 on the S&amp;P 500 in 2009, but always the possibility it could overshoot on the downside. Says many unintended consequences abound.  But he recommends to slowly wade in at current levels.  He cites how he recommended to his sister, to be 20% in equities. Interestingly, that is down from 30% a few weeks ago, so it seems he has gotten a bit more bearish as of late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JG suggests market is likely going to around 600 on the S&amp;P 500 in 2009, but always the possibility it could overshoot on the downside. Says many unintended consequences abound.  But he recommends to slowly wade in at current levels.  He cites how he recommended to his sister, to be 20% in equities. Interestingly, that is down from 30% a few weeks ago, so it seems he has gotten a bit more bearish as of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

