Jim Welsh — Special Update, 11.26.08

Email this post Print this post
By Guest Author - November 28th, 2008, 10:51AM

Jim Welsh of Welsh Money Management has been publishing his monthly investment letter, “The Financial Commentator”, since 1985. His analysis focuses on Federal Reserve monetary policy, and how policy affects the economy and the financial markets.

~~~

In the October and November letter I wrote, “My guess is that the DJIA will drop below 7,882, but hold above 7,200 in coming weeks. If this develops, a one to three month rally could follow, as analysts convince themselves that a narrowing in credit spreads and a second bigger stimulus plan will mean the economy will begin to recover by mid 2009. As more investors embrace this scenario, selling pressure will dry up, and coupled with a little buying and some short covering, the market will rally on lighter volume. This is what happened after the March low, and the market rallied for two months. If this plays out, the DJIA could rise to 9,600-10,200, and the S&P to 1000-1050. My guess is that after this rally is over, the DJIA will likely drop below 7,200 by next spring.” In the November letter, I wrote, “So far this scenario seems on track. However, the DJIA has really been masking the weakness in the overall market. The S&P is below its October intra day low by -4.0%, the Russell 2000 and Nasdaq 100 are both below their October 10 lows by -11.7%, even as the DJIA holds above 7,882. This degree of weakness increases the odds that the 2002 and 2003 lows will be tested sooner, rather than later. If the DJIA drops below 7,882, traders should look for an entry. Needless to say, with the VIX above 70, this is not for the faint of heart. Where ever you choose to go long, use DJIA 7,200 as a stop, and raise the stop to the DJIA low, if the DJIA climbs above 8,200.”

At the low last Friday, the S&P was -11.9% below the intra day low on October 10, while the Russell 2000 was -20.7% below its low. I’ve heard some analysts call this a successful retest of the October 10 lows. Given how far these averages fell below their prior lows, it seems more like a breach to me.

I wish some of my teachers in school had considered a 62 a successful test of my math skills.
About an hour before the close on Friday November 21, it was leaked that Tim Geithner would be
the new Treasury Secretary. By the end of the day, the DJIA was up 500 points. Justified? Not really.

After all, Geithner has been Paulsen’s right hand man all during this crisis, and has been very
involved in all the decisions made along the way. So, Geithner is not going to bring any new
perspective to the table.

But on Tuesday November 25, the Federal Reserve and Treasury announced plans to support the
securitization markets for credit cards, auto loans, student loans, and mortgage backed securities.
This is good. As I have noted over the last year, securitization has become an integral part of the

credit creation process over the last 15 years. This meant the Fed had less control over the amount of credit flowing into the economy leading up to this crisis. More importantly, it meant the Fed would have less leverage in containing the crisis as it continued to develop. Over the last year, the securitized volume of mortgage debt, auto loans, and credit card debt has declined by more than 75%. The breakdown in securitization of lending has led to less availability of credit for even credit worthy borrowers. The steps announced on Tuesday should help.

President-elect Obama has also indicated that he will propose a very large stimulus package to support the economy. It has been my expectation that the prospect of a bigger stimulus program would result in a growing number of investors to expect the economy to do better by mid 2009. This would lead to a drop in selling pressure, which meant a little buying and short covering would be able to lift the market. My guess is that this rally began last Friday. This rally that will be very choppy, as negative news will continue to buffet the equity market. A rising wedge pattern sounds possible. Time wise, this rally should approximate the length of the March-May rally, 9 weeks, give or take a little.

Fundamentally, it will occur as people hope that a bigger stimulus plan will turn the economy around. Instead of $150 billion, like this spring, President-elect Obama will announce a far larger stimulus plan, maybe $400-$500 billion, or 3% of GDP. Most people will confuse an artificial boost to GDP as evidence of a self sustaining recovery. There is a big difference, as I noted in the February and March letters. In the spring, most analysts expected the $150 billion stimulus plan would lift the economy in the second half of 2008. I really didn’t think it would, since a one-time stimulus plan boosts GDP, only as it passes through the economy. Once the money is spent, used to pay down debt, or saved, the support for the economy wanes. Although it succeeded in boosting GDP in the second quarter, it failed to launch a self sustaining economic expansion. A self sustaining expansion needs no artificial stimulus to maintain itself, as confidence is high enough that consumers spend their own money and companies hire and boost capital expenditures. It is possible, of course, that a big enough stimulus plan could provide enough forward momentum to launch a self sustaining recovery.

That’s everyone’s hope. However, unless credit creation is revived sufficiently by banks and within the credit market, the economy won’t have the available credit it needs to sustain the forward momentum provided by the stimulus. Given the structural breakdown in the credit creation process within the banking system and credit market, and the contraction in economic activity we’re seeing in the fourth quarter and in next year’s first quarter, the economy will likely slow, after getting a lift from the stimulus plan. Will that post stimulus plan slowdown be deep, or a dip, before the economy begins growing? My guess is that it will be deep enough to cause the stock market to drop below last week’s lows.

In the meantime, the market should be able to hold up for 6 to 10 weeks, maybe a bit longer. Traders were advised to pick a spot to go long, once the DJIA dropped below 7,882, using 7,200, the 2002 low as a stop. The actual low last Friday was 7,450. I would raise the stop from 7,200 to 7,700. If the DJIA gets above 9,000, raise the stop to 8,050. Sell half if the DJIA reaches 9,540. For those who missed the reversal, buy if the DJIA falls below 8,300, using 7,950 as a stop. Sell half if the DJIA reaches 9,540

-E. James Welsh

11 Responses to “Jim Welsh — Special Update, 11.26.08”

  1. DP Says:

    A lot of people seem to believe we’re heading lower short term but will see lower lows over the next few months. Look at what we had in October/November driving the market lows:

    - Massive institutional forced liquidation.
    - No political leadership - Obama’s team was very quiet for two weeks. Once they started talking things picked up.
    - Apparent imminent collapse of Citigroup, until they were bailed out.
    - The “shock” effect of all the bad news coming in, particularly job losses. Now we’re just used to it.
    - Predictions of a completely dead black friday, so far not holding true.
    - The threat of the “big 3″ being allowed to go into chapter 11. Seems less likely but still possible.

    I need to figure out which I fear most, another temporary (or even permanent) 30% hit to current long positions, or getting out next week for a nice short term gain and missing stock prices / valuations I may never see again.

    I’d really like to hear what folks see as the catalysts that will drive us to even newer lows when you take into account all it took (above) to get us to the current lows? In spite of all the market reading I’ve done over the last few months, I still feel like I really don’t understand the downside from here well enough. Appreciate any links or insight others have on this.

    Or, the shorter version, if I were to say “We won’t see DOW 7000 or lower, tell me why I’m wrong.”

  2. KJ Foehr Says:

    A lot of people have moved to the year-end rally and late winter sell-off side of the boat, and that is a bit of a red flag for me. I even feel it is likely myself, and that is an even bigger red flag!

    It has all become so unclear since the October crash.

    It reminds me of one of my favorite Far Side cartoons,

    How fishermen blow their minds:

    Fish or cut bait?
    Fish or cut bait?
    Fish or cut bait?

  3. KJ Foehr Says:

    DP Says:
    “I’d really like to hear what folks see as the catalysts that will drive us to even newer lows when you take into account all it took (above) to get us to the current lows?”

    Sustained dismal macro economic news and declining corporate earnings over the next 3 quarters or so. Including but not limited to, more bankruptcies, defaults by corporations and local governments, hedge fund blowups, deflation or fear of it, big new reports of layoffs after the holidays and rising unemployment, additional financial crises in regional banks and in some emerging market governments.

    In short, a downward spiraling global economy that will continue to darken the mood after brief periods (such as the current one) in which hope reemerges that a recovery is nigh.

    But that’s just my opinion, and I ain’t no economist and no Einstein neither, so take it for what is worth.

    Full disclosure: I’m fading this rally. I’m about 17% on the short side after today, and I expect to be 100% short by the end of December, after being 100% in cash earlier this week. That is unless I get knocked out by a continued raging rally, in which case I will push out the timeframe waiting for it to fizzle.

  4. leftback Says:

    DP Says:
    “I’d really like to hear what folks see as the catalysts that will drive us to even newer lows when you take into account all it took (above) to get us to the current lows?”

    Declining earnings and multiple contraction to P/E = 8 or so are features of deep recessions and bear markets. Barry has discussed both here. This will take us lower after earnings emerge in January.

    I seriously doubt if we have seen the lows in the financial stocks as long as housing declines are in full flow. Perhaps when we see a negative second derivative - i.e. a decrease in the RATE of house price declines, we may be close to the bottom, if only because the floor for the housing market will then be predictable. I expect the floor to be somewhere around the 1992 house price levels. The CDS “conundrum” lurks in the background.

    I am expecting a near term pullback here (just picked up some SRS today; now 85% long:15% short) before the rally resumes in a week or so. Medium term I agree with the “year end rally” thesis. Declining VIX and market dynamics are recapitulating the March action. Longer term, I am bearish from earnings season into the spring, and I expect retests of the recent lows and a breakdown to SPX 650 area.

    It is appropriate to remember that we are now in a sector-specific market and some sectors (precious metals, energy) may have already seen their bear market lows. Not for sure, but a strong possibility.

    I am long COP, CHK, RTP, GDX, PAAS and some small miners. In addition I am long SRS and a bit of TBT - I am mystified by demand for the 10-year note.

  5. leftback Says:

    I meant negative second derivative of the decline, so that would be a POSITIVE second derivative of price.
    Still with me, everyone? Right… I thought so. Think of the bottom half of a sine wave. Oh never mind….

  6. KJ Foehr Says:

    @leftback

    Could the conundrum of the 10-year be simply deflation fears wringing out ALL the inflation expectations premium in the yield?

  7. leftback Says:

    @ KJ: Exactly, looked at TIPS lately?

    There is a nice pairs trade at some point. Long TIPS and short the 10-yr.
    I started this trade but I am too early, as always.

  8. KJ Foehr Says:

    I know I am revealing my ignorance (again), as I should already know, but how do you short long bonds? Is there an equity / ETF / double leverage?

    TIA

  9. KJ Foehr Says:

    I just found an answer — the TBT, double inverse the 20 year bond index.

    Sounds like a winner for ‘09 to me.

    thanks

  10. roc Says:

    How does the TBT work to establish that double inverse position? Is this a derivative or do they actually own something with that negative correlation?

    Thanks.

  11. BigBeluga Says:

    TBT uses swaps on the Lehman Brothers 20+ Year U.S. Treasury Index to establish the position.