<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nissan 370GT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/nissan-370gt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/nissan-370gt/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:33:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zirotti</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/nissan-370gt/comment-page-1/#comment-125157</link>
		<dc:creator>zirotti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 07:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=7200#comment-125157</guid>
		<description>Glad to see they are bringing the Datsun look and feel back...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see they are bringing the Datsun look and feel back&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/nissan-370gt/comment-page-1/#comment-124943</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=7200#comment-124943</guid>
		<description>A friend of mine owns a (2004, I think) 350Z, and this doesn&#039;t look (emphasis on look) like too much of a change.  I see they&#039;ve gone to the L-shaped head- and tail-lights that are all the rage.  But the interior looks virtually identical.  Of course there&#039;s another 5 years of engine development and another 200CCs, so I&#039;m sure it&#039;s a bit quicker.  It (the 350Z, at least) is a good car, so I guess they didn&#039;t need to change much.  The 350Z was a little too numb for my liking, though; but I&#039;m still in my 20&#039;s so I don&#039;t have to worry about all that jarring causing my hemorrhoids to flair up! :)  So I like my 2004 MazdaSpeed MX-5 Miata better, personally.  Turbo-lag&#039;s a b&#124;+(h though, so the Nissan&#039;s V6 is nicer in that respect.  I haven&#039;t driven one of the 370Zs but the 350Z had a bit of a funky power band, like every car that&#039;s come out lately that I&#039;ve driven.  I wish all the car manufacturers, across the board, would start scaling back on the peak horsepower to get more oomph down-low.  Seriously, as nice as it is to say your have 300 horsepower, I&#039;d take a car with 250 and a flatter power band any day.  The gearing in a lot of these cars make the extra power so unusable (screech the tires, bog for 4K or 5K rpm, then finally get power when you hit 40mph).  By the time I&#039;m in the power band, I&#039;m already nearing the speed limit and stuck behind another car and the engine sounds like it&#039;s going to send a piston through the hood.  It&#039;s pretty bad when I get a Chevy Cobalt as a rental car and the power band feels like my turbo Miata.  It&#039;s OK in the super-light weight Miata, because the turbo is a design trade-off to keep the car light; but in some of these other cars it&#039;s just ridiculous.  Lose a few tenths in the quarter mile and 0-60 times and make the car fun to drive on the road, where it&#039;s actually going to be used.  Hopefully they fixed this on the new Z... but I&#039;m not holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A friend of mine owns a (2004, I think) 350Z, and this doesn&#8217;t look (emphasis on look) like too much of a change.  I see they&#8217;ve gone to the L-shaped head- and tail-lights that are all the rage.  But the interior looks virtually identical.  Of course there&#8217;s another 5 years of engine development and another 200CCs, so I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s a bit quicker.  It (the 350Z, at least) is a good car, so I guess they didn&#8217;t need to change much.  The 350Z was a little too numb for my liking, though; but I&#8217;m still in my 20&#8242;s so I don&#8217;t have to worry about all that jarring causing my hemorrhoids to flair up! :)  So I like my 2004 MazdaSpeed MX-5 Miata better, personally.  Turbo-lag&#8217;s a b|+(h though, so the Nissan&#8217;s V6 is nicer in that respect.  I haven&#8217;t driven one of the 370Zs but the 350Z had a bit of a funky power band, like every car that&#8217;s come out lately that I&#8217;ve driven.  I wish all the car manufacturers, across the board, would start scaling back on the peak horsepower to get more oomph down-low.  Seriously, as nice as it is to say your have 300 horsepower, I&#8217;d take a car with 250 and a flatter power band any day.  The gearing in a lot of these cars make the extra power so unusable (screech the tires, bog for 4K or 5K rpm, then finally get power when you hit 40mph).  By the time I&#8217;m in the power band, I&#8217;m already nearing the speed limit and stuck behind another car and the engine sounds like it&#8217;s going to send a piston through the hood.  It&#8217;s pretty bad when I get a Chevy Cobalt as a rental car and the power band feels like my turbo Miata.  It&#8217;s OK in the super-light weight Miata, because the turbo is a design trade-off to keep the car light; but in some of these other cars it&#8217;s just ridiculous.  Lose a few tenths in the quarter mile and 0-60 times and make the car fun to drive on the road, where it&#8217;s actually going to be used.  Hopefully they fixed this on the new Z&#8230; but I&#8217;m not holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/nissan-370gt/comment-page-1/#comment-124912</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=7200#comment-124912</guid>
		<description>Those Nissan two-seaters, from the 240 onward, have always been serious motoring devices..yes, even the 300 )

Nissan, by itself, has to be of the most underappreciated marques in Autodom..

this: http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2006-07-10-ghosn-cover-usat_x.htm deal, that never happened, was, to me, the final bell, needed, to prove that GM wasn&#039;t serious about being a world-class Automotive co.--yes, it took a long time..

Ghosn, for as much press as he did receive, is still underappreciated..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those Nissan two-seaters, from the 240 onward, have always been serious motoring devices..yes, even the 300 )</p>
<p>Nissan, by itself, has to be of the most underappreciated marques in Autodom..</p>
<p>this: <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2006-07-10-ghosn-cover-usat_x.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2006-07-10-ghosn-cover-usat_x.htm</a> deal, that never happened, was, to me, the final bell, needed, to prove that GM wasn&#8217;t serious about being a world-class Automotive co.&#8211;yes, it took a long time..</p>
<p>Ghosn, for as much press as he did receive, is still underappreciated..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/nissan-370gt/comment-page-1/#comment-124892</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=7200#comment-124892</guid>
		<description>I seem to remember seeing this a few weeks ago. Is wordpress being screwy or is this just a repost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seem to remember seeing this a few weeks ago. Is wordpress being screwy or is this just a repost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

