<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Onion: Our long national nightmare . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/onion-our-long-national-nightmare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/onion-our-long-national-nightmare/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:43:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DeDude</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/onion-our-long-national-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-124766</link>
		<dc:creator>DeDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8205#comment-124766</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately the human condition is pretty pathetic.  When we the people feel society is in a really good situation, the main thing we are concerned about is not having to help those that are less fortunate than us.  At that point we vote for those who will not raise taxes.  When we see that the economy is going down and fear that we ourselves may be at risk for being without income, healt insurance etc., then we vote for those who will make sure that society is there to help.  Nanny state for ourselves when WE need it, tough “kick-yaself-in-the-a$$” love for everyone else when THEY need help.  Our bodies may have left the caves 10,000 years ago but our souls and hearts are still living in them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately the human condition is pretty pathetic.  When we the people feel society is in a really good situation, the main thing we are concerned about is not having to help those that are less fortunate than us.  At that point we vote for those who will not raise taxes.  When we see that the economy is going down and fear that we ourselves may be at risk for being without income, healt insurance etc., then we vote for those who will make sure that society is there to help.  Nanny state for ourselves when WE need it, tough “kick-yaself-in-the-a$$” love for everyone else when THEY need help.  Our bodies may have left the caves 10,000 years ago but our souls and hearts are still living in them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DEFT</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/onion-our-long-national-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-124736</link>
		<dc:creator>DEFT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 16:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8205#comment-124736</guid>
		<description>The opposite is true. History has shown time and again that when economics turns bad, prejudices explode, not recede.  

If folks had any prejudice at all, they would never have voted for a black guy after watching their 401ks and home equity sink and start worrying about their bank deposits as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The opposite is true. History has shown time and again that when economics turns bad, prejudices explode, not recede.  </p>
<p>If folks had any prejudice at all, they would never have voted for a black guy after watching their 401ks and home equity sink and start worrying about their bank deposits as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg0658</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/onion-our-long-national-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-124700</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg0658</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8205#comment-124700</guid>
		<description>I awoke last light and started channel surfing, landing on the b&amp;w documentary (A&amp;E classroom) on President Truman. It complelled me to wiki him this morning before bouncing into here. That time period and links to events during my mom and dads courtship are something. The relationships between countries in Asia, Gen MacArthur, the Abomb, McCarthy. I find it striking mom and dads make kids. I guess it&#039;s the survival instinct; somebody has to take care of us.
Those were interesting times of 1-up-manships. I&#039;m sure 50 years from now history will look similar. Cause thats the way it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I awoke last light and started channel surfing, landing on the b&amp;w documentary (A&amp;E classroom) on President Truman. It complelled me to wiki him this morning before bouncing into here. That time period and links to events during my mom and dads courtship are something. The relationships between countries in Asia, Gen MacArthur, the Abomb, McCarthy. I find it striking mom and dads make kids. I guess it&#8217;s the survival instinct; somebody has to take care of us.<br />
Those were interesting times of 1-up-manships. I&#8217;m sure 50 years from now history will look similar. Cause thats the way it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/onion-our-long-national-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-124689</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 11:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8205#comment-124689</guid>
		<description>Let me flesh out my theory a bit:

1) We know of the existence of the Presidents Working Group to stabilize markets, formed by Reagan after the 1987 crash. They have been mentioned recently even by MSM. If they EVER work to stabilize markets, they must be doing so now, during the &quot;greatest crisis since the Great Depression that every economist says will never result in a new depression.&quot;™ A logical extension of this conclusion is they have been as active as ever, possibly going a bit nuts about it. This group is also know to some as the Plunge Protection Team (PPT).

2) Barry has made countless posts taking government data to task...NFP......B/D...Inflation...GDP. The key numbers released by the government seem to all be skewed way positively. Again, that must be going on today to a great degree.

3) A key reason for an administration to undertake these activities is to get their party re-elected. Those hopes went up in smoke officially on Obama Day. Now their focus must be to unseat Obama in 2012. Why, for one minute, would they continue the PPT and the data spinning? Many on these teams see it is futile anyway. They can easily blame weakness in the market now on the reaction to Obama getting elected. They can really stick him with a mess. Obama wants this as well...the Presidential cycle posits that the new president wants things weaker relatively in years 1 and 2, so he can start the re-election turnaround in year 3-4.

This is why I concluded, and have posted since July, that an Obama election would result in an accellerated market tank. Just don&#039;t balme Obama getting elected for it...that is not the direct cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me flesh out my theory a bit:</p>
<p>1) We know of the existence of the Presidents Working Group to stabilize markets, formed by Reagan after the 1987 crash. They have been mentioned recently even by MSM. If they EVER work to stabilize markets, they must be doing so now, during the &#8220;greatest crisis since the Great Depression that every economist says will never result in a new depression.&#8221;™ A logical extension of this conclusion is they have been as active as ever, possibly going a bit nuts about it. This group is also know to some as the Plunge Protection Team (PPT).</p>
<p>2) Barry has made countless posts taking government data to task&#8230;NFP&#8230;&#8230;B/D&#8230;Inflation&#8230;GDP. The key numbers released by the government seem to all be skewed way positively. Again, that must be going on today to a great degree.</p>
<p>3) A key reason for an administration to undertake these activities is to get their party re-elected. Those hopes went up in smoke officially on Obama Day. Now their focus must be to unseat Obama in 2012. Why, for one minute, would they continue the PPT and the data spinning? Many on these teams see it is futile anyway. They can easily blame weakness in the market now on the reaction to Obama getting elected. They can really stick him with a mess. Obama wants this as well&#8230;the Presidential cycle posits that the new president wants things weaker relatively in years 1 and 2, so he can start the re-election turnaround in year 3-4.</p>
<p>This is why I concluded, and have posted since July, that an Obama election would result in an accellerated market tank. Just don&#8217;t balme Obama getting elected for it&#8230;that is not the direct cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SandBagging</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/onion-our-long-national-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-124688</link>
		<dc:creator>SandBagging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 06:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8205#comment-124688</guid>
		<description>I like to play a game of finding headlines from respected news outfits that are more suitable for The Onion. For example:

eBay buyer faces libel action after leaving negative feedback
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5009293.ece</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like to play a game of finding headlines from respected news outfits that are more suitable for The Onion. For example:</p>
<p>eBay buyer faces libel action after leaving negative feedback<br />
<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5009293.ece" rel="nofollow">http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article5009293.ece</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/onion-our-long-national-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-124687</link>
		<dc:creator>Calvin Jones and the 13th Apostle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 05:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8205#comment-124687</guid>
		<description>Patrick:
Why wouldn&#039;t we like it?  I might be an Obama supporter but I thought it was funny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick:<br />
Why wouldn&#8217;t we like it?  I might be an Obama supporter but I thought it was funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/onion-our-long-national-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-124679</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8205#comment-124679</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s why the Onion rules, they shred both sides although I&#039;m sure most &#039;round here won&#039;t like it.

http://www.theonion.com/content/video/obama_win_causes_obsessive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s why the Onion rules, they shred both sides although I&#8217;m sure most &#8217;round here won&#8217;t like it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/video/obama_win_causes_obsessive" rel="nofollow">http://www.theonion.com/content/video/obama_win_causes_obsessive</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/onion-our-long-national-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-124675</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8205#comment-124675</guid>
		<description>Yeap, Bush single handedly destroyed the Galaxy.  Thank God Congress didn&#039;t ever get involved!  Whew, imagine that cluster fuck!  http://www.knology.net/~aquaabyss/job.jpg

~~~

&lt;B&gt;BR&lt;/b&gt;: I guess I was wrong. Bush is awesome! 
Best president ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeap, Bush single handedly destroyed the Galaxy.  Thank God Congress didn&#8217;t ever get involved!  Whew, imagine that cluster fuck!  <a href="http://www.knology.net/~aquaabyss/job.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.knology.net/~aquaabyss/job.jpg</a></p>
<p>~~~</p>
<p><b>BR</b>: I guess I was wrong. Bush is awesome!<br />
Best president ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg0658</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/onion-our-long-national-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-124674</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg0658</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8205#comment-124674</guid>
		<description>How many months does it take to sell out of the market on MIC pull down/out? Is 6800 still the mark?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many months does it take to sell out of the market on MIC pull down/out? Is 6800 still the mark?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/onion-our-long-national-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-124670</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8205#comment-124670</guid>
		<description>The Onion is a far more credible publication than the WSJ&#039;s Op-Ed page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Onion is a far more credible publication than the WSJ&#8217;s Op-Ed page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
