<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Portfolio Cover: After the Fall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/portfolio-cover-after-the-fall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/portfolio-cover-after-the-fall/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:39:57 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/portfolio-cover-after-the-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-126133</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9329#comment-126133</guid>
		<description>Good call .

@Mike in Nola Says:
November 13th, 2008 at 2:47 pm-Big bullish sign: Cramer pooh-poohing rally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call .</p>
<p>@Mike in Nola Says:<br />
November 13th, 2008 at 2:47 pm-Big bullish sign: Cramer pooh-poohing rally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/portfolio-cover-after-the-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-126106</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9329#comment-126106</guid>
		<description>Mannwich  @ 2:57 


The Dow would have to get to 6000 for Luskin to capitulate. 

For Bowyer, it would have to go to 1000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mannwich  @ 2:57 </p>
<p>The Dow would have to get to 6000 for Luskin to capitulate. </p>
<p>For Bowyer, it would have to go to 1000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mannwich</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/portfolio-cover-after-the-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-126104</link>
		<dc:creator>Mannwich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9329#comment-126104</guid>
		<description>@Mike in Nola:  What about Bowyer and Luskin?  Did they ever capitulate?  If not, I&#039;m still bearish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike in Nola:  What about Bowyer and Luskin?  Did they ever capitulate?  If not, I&#8217;m still bearish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike in Nola</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/portfolio-cover-after-the-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-126099</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike in Nola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9329#comment-126099</guid>
		<description>Big bullish sign: Cramer pooh-poohing rally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big bullish sign: Cramer pooh-poohing rally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DP</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/portfolio-cover-after-the-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-126073</link>
		<dc:creator>DP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9329#comment-126073</guid>
		<description>@I-Man:

I wondered that too, what is the &quot;margin of error&quot; on a retest? How much data to we really have? Many of the trading charts way back in the past were from a non-digital era before people could set up trades to run at exactly &quot;840.23232&quot; on the SPX or whatever benchmarks they used.

Anecdotally, I noticed that even during the run down UYM behaved itself very well. Picked up a little, let&#039;s see how that does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@I-Man:</p>
<p>I wondered that too, what is the &#8220;margin of error&#8221; on a retest? How much data to we really have? Many of the trading charts way back in the past were from a non-digital era before people could set up trades to run at exactly &#8220;840.23232&#8243; on the SPX or whatever benchmarks they used.</p>
<p>Anecdotally, I noticed that even during the run down UYM behaved itself very well. Picked up a little, let&#8217;s see how that does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: albnyc</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/portfolio-cover-after-the-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-126070</link>
		<dc:creator>albnyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9329#comment-126070</guid>
		<description>@Whammer:

Proof that &quot;stupid is as stupid does&quot; I guess.  Off to plant my corn crop...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Whammer:</p>
<p>Proof that &#8220;stupid is as stupid does&#8221; I guess.  Off to plant my corn crop&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whammer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/portfolio-cover-after-the-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-126068</link>
		<dc:creator>Whammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9329#comment-126068</guid>
		<description>Good on ya, Mind!

@albnyc -- sounds like the way I was diversified in 2000 -- hardware, software, networking, dot coms......

I just have a secret desire to work until I&#039;m 93.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good on ya, Mind!</p>
<p>@albnyc &#8212; sounds like the way I was diversified in 2000 &#8212; hardware, software, networking, dot coms&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I just have a secret desire to work until I&#8217;m 93&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pat G.</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/portfolio-cover-after-the-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-126067</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9329#comment-126067</guid>
		<description>&quot;Problem is we don’t know what bonds are good either.&quot;

Look for that market to crash in 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Problem is we don’t know what bonds are good either.&#8221;</p>
<p>Look for that market to crash in 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/portfolio-cover-after-the-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-126058</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9329#comment-126058</guid>
		<description>John  Kenneth Galbraith has said that “fiscal memory” lasts about 20 years.     

In this case, I think it’ll be a lot less.        The “financial engineers” on Wall Street will be back before long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John  Kenneth Galbraith has said that “fiscal memory” lasts about 20 years.     </p>
<p>In this case, I think it’ll be a lot less.        The “financial engineers” on Wall Street will be back before long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I-Man</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/portfolio-cover-after-the-fall/comment-page-1/#comment-126057</link>
		<dc:creator>I-Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=9329#comment-126057</guid>
		<description>Is this muted response and current bounce off of  breaking the lows on SPX an indication that we&#039;ve already made our &quot;psychological low&quot;...?

This could be a solid entry point for new longs should we pick up some volume on the buying... maybe there were a ton of buyers waiting precisely for a retest/break scenario before committing new capital to equities.  That would make sense given the uncertainty surrounding the election following our last low...

Thats the only thing I can think of to describe what we&#039;re seeing now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this muted response and current bounce off of  breaking the lows on SPX an indication that we&#8217;ve already made our &#8220;psychological low&#8221;&#8230;?</p>
<p>This could be a solid entry point for new longs should we pick up some volume on the buying&#8230; maybe there were a ton of buyers waiting precisely for a retest/break scenario before committing new capital to equities.  That would make sense given the uncertainty surrounding the election following our last low&#8230;</p>
<p>Thats the only thing I can think of to describe what we&#8217;re seeing now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
