<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Videos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/videos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/videos/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 07:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg0658</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/videos/comment-page-1/#comment-124200</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg0658</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=7294#comment-124200</guid>
		<description>Sorry to turn this thread into a comments on the newsite thread. 
First your loosing my interest.
Primarily two things a&gt; the type size and style of comments. I like the typeface (sans serif) and whatever size the old site was b&gt; the perceived vastness of the site now. The feeling that I can&#039;t keep up, so why bother. Its all the headings.

But on that last point - I discovered an FYI this morning. The &lt;&gt; under the banner - once your using that function, it takes you though each of the threads into / outof the Tabs (seemingly by BRs posted on date/time stamp). This sortof removes the vastness of the new site.

On that functional area &lt;&gt; It would be nice to repeat the area at the bottom to save a scroll up to move on to the next thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to turn this thread into a comments on the newsite thread.<br />
First your loosing my interest.<br />
Primarily two things a&gt; the type size and style of comments. I like the typeface (sans serif) and whatever size the old site was b&gt; the perceived vastness of the site now. The feeling that I can&#8217;t keep up, so why bother. Its all the headings.</p>
<p>But on that last point &#8211; I discovered an FYI this morning. The &lt;&gt; under the banner &#8211; once your using that function, it takes you though each of the threads into / outof the Tabs (seemingly by BRs posted on date/time stamp). This sortof removes the vastness of the new site.</p>
<p>On that functional area &lt;&gt; It would be nice to repeat the area at the bottom to save a scroll up to move on to the next thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snickers</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/videos/comment-page-1/#comment-124193</link>
		<dc:creator>Snickers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 04:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=7294#comment-124193</guid>
		<description>Videos are cool but lets not neglect audio-only content (Russ Roberts&#039;s EconTalk for example), and maybe even point out instances where audio is available separate from video (Bill Moyers for example).

Audio is more portable, and more versatile in terms of situations it can be used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Videos are cool but lets not neglect audio-only content (Russ Roberts&#8217;s EconTalk for example), and maybe even point out instances where audio is available separate from video (Bill Moyers for example).</p>
<p>Audio is more portable, and more versatile in terms of situations it can be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

