<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: VIX Slips Below 50</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/vix-slips-below-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/vix-slips-below-50/</link>
	<description>Macro Perspective on the Capital Markets, Economy, Geopolitics, Technology, and Digital Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:24:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ze Carioca</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/vix-slips-below-50/comment-page-1/#comment-124648</link>
		<dc:creator>Ze Carioca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8051#comment-124648</guid>
		<description>Ah.. selling vol. Best thing is when you sell 30 vol and it goes to 60, you rarely just lose 30. You get demolished!!!

And when it moves like this you get demolished day in and day out.  Basically if it&#039;s moving Vol moves out. if it stops for a moment it gets too expensive to carry and comes in. 

Direction I am often wrong about but Selling options is always just insanity!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah.. selling vol. Best thing is when you sell 30 vol and it goes to 60, you rarely just lose 30. You get demolished!!!</p>
<p>And when it moves like this you get demolished day in and day out.  Basically if it&#8217;s moving Vol moves out. if it stops for a moment it gets too expensive to carry and comes in. </p>
<p>Direction I am often wrong about but Selling options is always just insanity!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark E Hoffer</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/vix-slips-below-50/comment-page-1/#comment-124594</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark E Hoffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8051#comment-124594</guid>
		<description>wasn&#039;t that just a &#039;classic&#039; pull-back to the nearby MA? whatever one that is denoted by the magenta line...

I don&#039;t think &#039;volatility&#039; is going away, anytime soon.  As a matter of fact, rather, &quot;non-linearity is the new volatility&quot;..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wasn&#8217;t that just a &#8216;classic&#8217; pull-back to the nearby MA? whatever one that is denoted by the magenta line&#8230;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think &#8216;volatility&#8217; is going away, anytime soon.  As a matter of fact, rather, &#8220;non-linearity is the new volatility&#8221;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roncfp</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/vix-slips-below-50/comment-page-1/#comment-124589</link>
		<dc:creator>roncfp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 20:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8051#comment-124589</guid>
		<description>Well that didn&#039;t last long.  So much for the &quot;sub-50&quot; celebration...... 55 and climbing.  Ouch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well that didn&#8217;t last long.  So much for the &#8220;sub-50&#8243; celebration&#8230;&#8230; 55 and climbing.  Ouch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramstone</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/vix-slips-below-50/comment-page-1/#comment-124580</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8051#comment-124580</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;It’s starting to look like 70 is the new 30.&lt;/i&gt;

Yes, but what I want to knowis whats the new 15.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>It’s starting to look like 70 is the new 30.</i></p>
<p>Yes, but what I want to knowis whats the new 15.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/vix-slips-below-50/comment-page-1/#comment-124576</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8051#comment-124576</guid>
		<description>Bruce N Tennessee  @  1:45

   Of course, it’s not quite that simple, as a 12 month chart of  QID or QLD (for example) will reveal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce N Tennessee  @  1:45</p>
<p>   Of course, it’s not quite that simple, as a 12 month chart of  QID or QLD (for example) will reveal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce N Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/vix-slips-below-50/comment-page-1/#comment-124573</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce N Tennessee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8051#comment-124573</guid>
		<description>@DL:

One good thing about these new funds...if they are leveraged 3 to 1 and you think you should be 30 per cent in stocks....wellllll...you can keep 90 per cent in bonds and invest the 10 per  cent in the 3/1 funds, and viola!  Two birds killed with one stone!  I may get the hang of this economic stuff any day now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DL:</p>
<p>One good thing about these new funds&#8230;if they are leveraged 3 to 1 and you think you should be 30 per cent in stocks&#8230;.wellllll&#8230;you can keep 90 per cent in bonds and invest the 10 per  cent in the 3/1 funds, and viola!  Two birds killed with one stone!  I may get the hang of this economic stuff any day now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patient renter</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/vix-slips-below-50/comment-page-1/#comment-124569</link>
		<dc:creator>patient renter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8051#comment-124569</guid>
		<description>Well QID and SDS are less volatile than some of the other Proshares, but 3x leverage could be downright dangerous. I guess we&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well QID and SDS are less volatile than some of the other Proshares, but 3x leverage could be downright dangerous. I guess we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/vix-slips-below-50/comment-page-1/#comment-124564</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8051#comment-124564</guid>
		<description>For those of you who think that QID and SDS are just too tame: 

http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Direxion-Funds-916219.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who think that QID and SDS are just too tame: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Direxion-Funds-916219.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Direxion-Funds-916219.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karen</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/vix-slips-below-50/comment-page-1/#comment-124560</link>
		<dc:creator>karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8051#comment-124560</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m not thrilled that spx just dropped below 980.  my picks today were vlo and ibn; thus far i would have been better off with sds.  agree with barry on $vix...  in hindsight it&#039;s a crystal ball.  60 minute vix is rolling over; 30 minute vix is conflicted.  

crap shoots are so much fun!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not thrilled that spx just dropped below 980.  my picks today were vlo and ibn; thus far i would have been better off with sds.  agree with barry on $vix&#8230;  in hindsight it&#8217;s a crystal ball.  60 minute vix is rolling over; 30 minute vix is conflicted.  </p>
<p>crap shoots are so much fun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2008/11/vix-slips-below-50/comment-page-1/#comment-124559</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 17:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/?p=8051#comment-124559</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s starting to look like 70 is the new 30.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s starting to look like 70 is the new 30.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

